Korean J Leg Med.  2013 Feb;37(1):9-13. 10.7580/kjlm.2013.37.1.9.

Differences in the Determination of Cause and Manner of 127 Natural Death Cases by Postmortem Inspection and Autopsy

• Huh GY
• Kim KH
• Jo GR
• Lee SY

• KMID: 2250273
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.7580/kjlm.2013.37.1.9

Abstract

Medico-legal investigations in Korea depend mostly on postmortem inspection without autopsy. Both untrained physicians and experienced forensic pathologists may not be able to determine the cause and manner of death only by postmortem inspection. The aim of our study was to show the limitations of postmortem inspection by evaluating the discrepancy between the results of postmortem inspection and autopsy after natural death. The manner of death by postmortem inspection changed to unnatural death in 9.4% of the cases (12 cases/127 cases) after autopsy. The cause of death in most cases was consumption of alcohol, agricultural chemicals, and antipsychotic intoxication. The cause of death by postmortem inspection changed in 24.3% of the cases (26 cases/107 cases) among cases of confirmed natural death after autopsy. The positive predictive value of cause of death by postmortem inspection was higher for cardiovascular disease (79.0%) and lower for chronic alcoholism and/or chronic liver disease (28.6%). This study shows that forensic pathologists could make considerable errors in determining the cause and manner of death without autopsy and emphasizes the necessity to refine medico-legal investigations in Korea by introducing the limited autopsy with toxicologic study and supportive postmortem imaging.

Keyword

Cause of death; Manner of death; Postmortem inspection; Autopsy; Forensic pathologists

MeSH Terms

Agrochemicals
Alcoholism
Autopsy
Cardiovascular Diseases
Cause of Death
Korea
Liver Diseases
Agrochemicals

Reference

1. Park EU. Consented Autopsy. Korean J Leg Med. 2011; 35:85–91.

2. Burton JL, Underwood J. Clinical, educational, and epidemiological value of autopsy. Lancet. 2007; 369:1471–80.

3. Winters B, Custer J, Galvagno SM Jr, et al. Diagnostic errors in the intensive care unit: a systematic review of autopsy studies. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012; 21:894–902.

4. Kapusta ND, Tran US, Rockett IR, et al. Declining autopsy rates and suicide misclassification: a cross-national analysis of 35 countries. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2011; 68:1050–7.

5. Na JY, Min BW, Lee YJ, et al. The discrepancy of the causes of death between medical certificates and autopsy reports. Korean J Leg Med. 2009; 33:10–8.

6. Na JI, Lee YJ, Kim HS, et al. Discrepant causes of death between medical death certificates and autopsy reports (II). Korean J Leg Med. 2012; 36:27–33.

7. Asnaes S. Uncertainty of determining mode and cause of death without autopsy: an autopsy study of medically unattended non-medicolegal deaths. Forensic Sci Int. 1980; 15:191–6.

8. Vanatta PR, Petty CS. Limitations of the forensic external examination in determining the cause and manner of death. Hum Pathol. 1987; 18:170–4.

9. Nashelsky MB, Lawrence CH. Accuracy of cause of death determination without forensic autopsy examination. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2003; 24:313–9.

10. Lorin de la Grandmaison G, Fermanian C, Durigon M. Analysis of discrepancies between external body examination and forensic autopsy. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2008; 29:40–2.

11. Kim JH, Lee SD. About reform of autopsy system: focus into the limited autopsy. Korean J Leg Med. 2004; 28:18–23.

12. Okuda T, Shiotani S, Sakamoto N, et al. Background and current status of postmortem imaging in Japan: Short history of “Autopsy imaging (Ai)”. Forensic Sci Int. 2012. DOI: doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.03.010.