Korean J Health Promot.  2015 Sep;15(3):150-159. 10.15384/kjhp.2015.15.3.150.

A Comparative Study on the Assessment of the Quality of Life by Older Cancer Patients and Caregivers and Assessment of Performance Status by Medical Staff

• Choi K
• Bae H
• Lim YO
• Nam I
• Yoon H
• Kim Y
• Lee HJ

• KMID: 2247210
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.15384/kjhp.2015.15.3.150

Abstract

BACKGROUND
The study examined the correlations among the results of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)-Quality of Life Questionnaire, Core 30 (QLQ-C30) completed by elderly cancer patients and their family caregivers and the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG)-performance status (PS) evaluated by medical doctors.
METHODS
The study sample included 269 persons with cancer aged 55 years or older and their family caregivers recruited from hospitals located in Seoul and Gyeonggi-do. The results of the ECOG-PS evaluated by medical doctors were obtained from medical records. Intra-class correlation analysis was used to assess rater reliability between the elderly cancer patients and their family caregivers. Correlations among the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the ECOG-PS were tested using the Kruskal-Wallis test and Spearmen's correlation.
RESULTS
The results showed that four subscales of quality of life (physical functioning, emotional functioning, social functioning, and global health status) and three items under symptoms (fatigue, pain, and financial difficulties) in the EORTC QLQ-C30 were highly consistent between patients and their family caregivers. From the EORTC QLQ-C30 results, social functioning, role functioning, health status, fatigue, pain, and appetite loss (patients results) and physical functioning (family caregivers results) were highly consistent with the results of the ECOG-PS by the physicians.
CONCLUSIONS
The findings suggest that when the older persons with cancer have difficulty expressing their own thoughts or feelings, the EORTC QLQ-C30 completed by their family caregivers and the results of the ECOG-PS completed by the physicians could be used as substitutes.

Keyword

EORTC QLQ-C30; ECOG-PS; Elderly cancer patients; Family caregivers

MeSH Terms

Aged
Appetite
Caregivers*
Fatigue
Gyeonggi-do
Humans
Medical Records
Medical Staff*
Quality of Life*
Seoul

Reference

1.Seo H., Park J., Kim S., Yang H., Nam E. Cancer facts & figures 2013. Goyang: National Cancer Center;2013. [Accessed May 19, 2014].http://www.cancer.go.kr/mbs/cancer/jsp/album/gallery.jsp?addCancerTitle=&spage=5&boardId=31817&boardSeq=399626&mcategoryId=&id=cancer_050207000000.

2.Sprangers MA., Aaronson NK. The role of health care providers and significant others in evaluating the quality of life of patients with chronic disease: a review. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992. 45(7):743–60.

3.Sneeuw KC., Aaronson NK., de Haan RJ., Limburg M. Assessing quality of life after stroke. The value and limitations of proxy ratings. Stroke. 1997. 28(8):1541–9.

4.Magaziner J., Simonsick EM., Kashner TM., Hebel JR. Patient-proxy response comparability on measures of patient health and functional status. J Clin Epidemiol. 1988. 41(11):1065–74.

5.Sneeuw KC., Aaronson NK., Sprangers MA., Detmar SB., Wever LD., Schornagel JH. Comparison of patient and proxy EORTC QLQ-C30 ratings in assessing the quality of life of cancer patients. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998. 51(7):617–31.

6.Epstein AM., Hall JA., Tognetti J., Son LH., Conant L Jr. Using proxies to evaluate quality of life. Can they provide valid information about patients' health status and satisfaction with medical care? Med Care. 1989. 27(3 Suppl):S91–8.

7.Clipp EC., George LK. Patients with cancer and their spouse caregivers. Perceptions of the illness experience. Cancer. 1992. 69(4):1074–9.

8.McPherson CJ., Wilson KG., Lobchuk MM., Brajtman S. Family caregivers' assessment of symptoms in patients with advanced cancer: concordance with patients and factors affecting accuracy. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2008. 35(1):70–82.

9.Tang ST. Concordance of quality-of-life assessments between terminally ill cancer patients and their primary family caregivers in Taiwan. Cancer Nurs. 2006. 29(1):49–57.

10.Tang ST. Predictors of the extent of agreement for quality of life assessments between terminally ill cancer patients and their primary family caregivers in Taiwan. Qual Life Res. 2006. 15(3):391–404. discussion 405-9.

11.Bridge M., Roughton DI., Lewis S., Barelds J., Brenton S., Cotter S, et al. Using caregivers-as-proxies to retrospectively assess and measure quality of dying of palliative care clients. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2002. 19(3):193–9.

12.Fayers PM., Machin D. Quality of life: Assessment, analysis and interpretation. 1st ed.Chichester, UK: Wiley;2000.

13.Wilson KA., Dowling AJ., Abdolell M., Tannock IF. Perception of quality of life by patients, partners and treating physicians. Qual Life Res. 2000. 9(9):1041–52.

14.Osoba D., Zee B., Pater J., Warr D., Kaizer L., Latreille J. Psychometric properties and responsiveness of the EORTC quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) in patients with breast, ovarian and lung cancer. Qual Life Res. 1994. 3(5):353–64.

15.Oliva EN., Nobile F., Alimena G., Ronco F., Specchia G., Impera S, et al. Quality of life in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia: patients may be more accurate than physicians. Haematologica. 2011. 96(5):696–702.

16.Janjua NZ., Khan MI., Clemens JD. Estimates of intraclass correlation coefficient and design effect for surveys and cluster randomized trials on injection use in Pakistan and developing countries. Trop Med Int Health. 2006. 11(12):1832–40.

17.Park J., Ko J., Kim S., Yoo H. Faculty observer and standardized patient accuracy in recording examinees' behaviors using checklists in the clinical performance examination. Korean J Med Educ. 2009. 21(3):287–97.

18.Milne DJ., Mulder LL., Beelen HC., Schofield P., Kempen GI., Aranda S. Patients' self-report and family caregivers' perception of quality of life in patients with advanced cancer: how do they compare? Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2006. 15(2):125–32.

19.Yoon YH. Understanding and utilization of quality of life assessment. 1st ed. Seoul: Koonja Corp.;2011. p.109–16.