J Gynecol Oncol.  2009 Jun;20(2):133-133. 10.3802/jgo.2009.20.2.133.

In reply

• Kim WY
• Chang SJ
• Ryu HS

• KMID: 2245100
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2009.20.2.133

Abstract

No abstract available.

Reference

1. Piver MS, Chung WS. Prognostic significance of cervical lesion size and pelvic node metastases in cervical carcinoma. Obstet Gynecol. 1975. 46:507–510.

2. Hsu CT, Cheng YS, Su SC. Prognosis of uterine cervical cancer with extensive lymph node metastases: special emphasis on the value of pelvic lymphadenectomy in the surgical treatment of uterine cervical cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1972. 114:954–962.

3. Nahhas WA, Sharkey FE, Whitney CW, Husseinzadeh N, Chung CK, Mortel R. The prognostic significance of vascular channel involvement and deep stromal penetration in early cervical carcinoma. Am J Clin Oncol. 1983. 6:259–264.

4. Martimbeau PW, Kjorstad KE, Iversen T. Stage IB carcinoma of the cervix, the Norwegian Radium hospital: II. Results when pelvic nodes are involved. Obstet Gynecol. 1982. 60:215–218.

5. Van Nagel JR Jr, Donaldson ES, Parker JC, Van Dyke AH, Wood EG. The prognostic significance of cell type and lesion size in patients with cervical cancer treated by radical surgery. Gynecol Oncol. 1977. 5:142–151.

6. Delgado G, Bundy B, Zaino R, Sevin BU, Creasman WT, Major F. Prospective surgical-pathological study of disease-free interval in patients with stage IB squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol. 1990. 38:352–357.

7. Lee JW, Kim BG, Lee SJ, Lee SH, Park CS, Lee JH, et al. Preliminary results of consolidation chemotherapy following concurrent chemoradiation after radical surgery in high-risk early-stage carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2005. 17:412–417.