J Korean Ophthalmol Soc.  2013 Feb;54(2):310-316. 10.3341/jkos.2013.54.2.310.

Surgical Outcomes of Intermittent Exotropia According to the Constancy

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Ophthalmology, Bucheon St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, College of Medicine, Bucheon, Korea. nyeokang@catholic.ac.kr

Abstract

PURPOSE
To investigate how the constancy of intermittent exotropia affects postoperative motor and sensory outcomes.
METHODS
A retrospective analysis was conducted of 44 patients with intermittent exotropia (IXT group) and 16 patients with constant exotropia with a previous history of intermittent exotropia (CXT group). All patients were followed up for more than 1 year postoperatively. Successful postoperative motor alignment was defined as within 8 prism diopters of exo- or esotropia at 6 meters and 33 centimeters. Successful sensory outcome (bifixation) was considered as stereoacuity < or =60 seconds of arc. The influence of constancy, age at surgery, duration of strabismus, preoperative gross stereopsis, preoperative distant deviation, and preoperative distant fusion to surgical outcomes were evaluated using logistic regression analysis.
RESULTS
Mean age at surgery and follow-up periods was 9.34 years and 37.8 months in the IXT group, and 10.19 years and 45.7 months in the CXT group. Successful motor alignment rates of the IXT and CXT groups were 65.9% and 48.3%, respectively. Postoperative bifixation rates of the IXT and CXT groups were 70.5% and 12.5%, respectively. The IXT group showed significantly better successful sensory outcome (p = 0.000), but no significant difference in motor outcome (p = 0.121). Constancy and preoperative distant fusion were associated with post-operative bifixation in univariate regression analysis (p = 0.001, 0.025, respectively). However, only the constancy was strongly associated with successful sensory outcome in multivariate regression analysis with an odds ratio of 20.138 (p = 0.008).
CONCLUSIONS
Surgical correction of intermittent exotropia during the intermittent period showed better sensory outcome than in constant deviation period.

Keyword

Constancy; Constant exotropia; Intermittent exotropia; Sensory functions; Strabismus surgery

MeSH Terms

Depth Perception
Esotropia
Exotropia
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Logistic Models
Odds Ratio
Retrospective Studies
Sensation
Strabismus

Cited by  1 articles

The Period of Overcorrection after Surgery According to Age in Pediatric Patients with Intermittent Exotropia
Sung Won Cho, Suk Gyu Ha, Seung Hyun Kim
J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2019;60(2):176-180.    doi: 10.3341/jkos.2019.60.2.176.


Reference

References

1. Training O. Ocular deviations. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1964; 4:567.
2. Jenkins R. Demographics: geographic variations in the prevalence and management of exotropia. Am Orthopt J. 1992; 42:82–7.
Article
3. Ing MR, Pang SWL. The racial distribution of strabismus. In Strabismus III. Reinecke RD, editor. Grune & Stratton;New York: 1978. p. 107–9.
4. von Noorden GK. Binocular vision and ocular motility: theory and management of strabismus. 4th ed. St. Louis: CV Mosby;1990. p. 330–9.
5. Burke MJ. Intermittent exotropia. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1985; 25:53–68.
Article
6. Caltrider N, Jampolsky A. Overcorrecting minus lens therapy for treatment of intermittent exotropia. Ophthalmology. 1983; 90:1160–5.
Article
7. Parks MM. Monofixation syndrome: a frequent end stage of strabismus surgery. Trans Sect Ophthalmol Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1975; 79:733–5.
8. Eustis HS, Parks MM. Acquired monofixation syndrome. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1989; 26:169–72.
9. Pratt-Johnson JA, Barlow JM, Tillson G. Early surgery in intermittent exotropia. Am J Ophthalmol. 1977; 84:689–94.
Article
10. Abroms AD, Mohney BG, Rush DP, et al. Timely surgery in intermittent and constant exotropia for superior sensory outcome. Am J Ophthalmol. 2001; 131:111–6.
Article
11. Richard JM, Parks MM. Intermittent exotropia. Surgical results in different age groups. Ophthalmology. 1983; 90:1172–7.
Article
12. Hahm IR, Yoon SW, Baek SH, Kong SM. The clinical course of recurrent exotropia after reoperation for exodeviation. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2005; 19:140–4.
Article
13. Scott AB, Mash AJ, Jampolsky A. Quantitative guidelines for exotropia surgery. Invest Ophthalmol. 1975; 14:428–36.
14. Clarke WN, Noel LP. Surgical results in intermittent exotropia. Can J Ophthalmol. 1981; 16:66–9.
15. Wickens R. Results of surgery in distance exotropia. Br Orthop J. 1984; 41:66–72.
16. Stoller SH, Simon JW, Lininger LL. Bilateral lateral rectus recession for exotropia: a survival analysis. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1994; 31:89–92.
Article
17. Wu H, Sun J, Xia X, et al. Binocular status after surgery for constant and intermittent exotropia. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006; 142:822–6.
Article
18. Gezer A, Sezen F, Nasri N, Gözüm N. Factors influencing the outcome of strabismus surgery in patients with exotropia. J AAPOS. 2004; 8:56–60.
Article
19. Kushner BJ, Fisher MR, Lucchese NJ, Morton GV. Factors influencing response to strabismus surgery. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993; 111:75–9.
Article
20. Beneish R, Flanders M. The role of stereopsis and early postoperative alignment in long-term surgical results of intermittent exotropia. Can J Ophthalmol. 1994; 29:119–24.
21. Kim SJ. Comparison of surgical results between bilateral recession and unilateral recession-resection in intermittent exotropia. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 1992; 33:733–8.
22. Kim SJ, Lee WS. Clinical analysis of surgical results in exodeviation. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 1992; 33:724–32.
23. Kim MM, Cho ST. Long-term surgical results of intermittent exotropia. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 1994; 35:1321–6.
24. Park JK, Kyung SE. Clinical characteristics and related factors of surgical outcome in patient who underwent LR recession after the age of 10 years. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2010; 51:981–7.
Article
25. Ko KH, Min BM. Factors related to surgical results of intermittent exotropia. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 1996; 37:179–84.
26. Hunter DG, Kelly JB, Buffenn AN, Ellis FJ. Long-term outcome of uncomplicated infantile exotropia. J AAPOS. 2001; 5:352–6.
Article
27. Biglan AW, Davis JS, Cheng KP, Pettapiece MC. Infantile exotropia. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1996; 33:79–84.
Article
28. Cho YA, Lee JK. Early surgery before 4 years of age in intermittent exotropia. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2004; 45:620–5.
29. Beneish R, Flanders M. The role of stereopsis and early postoperative alignment in long-term surgical results of intermittent exotropia. Can J Ophthalmol. 1994; 29:119–24.
30. Baker JD, Davies GT. Monofixational intermittent exotropia. Arch Ophthalmol. 1979; 97:93–5.
Article
31. Suh YW, Cha D, Cho YA, Kim SH. Clinical findings of constant exotropia developed from intermittent exotropia. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2011; 52:462–5.
Article
32. Moore S, Stockbridge L, Knapp P. A panoramic view of exotropias. Am Orthopt J. 1977; 27:70–9.
Article
33. Lim HT, Jin YH. Concomitant hypertropia with intermittent exotropia. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2001; 42:459–63.
34. Yeo SI, Kim SY, Hwang WS, Kong SM. Surgical results according to sensory function tests in intermittent exotropia. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 1999; 40:3174–9.
35. Lee KW, Lee SY, Lee YC. Sensory status in patients showing orthophoria after strabismus surgery in exotropes. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2003; 44:128–33.
36. Rosenbaum AL, Santiago AP. Clinical strabismus management : principles and surgical techniques. 1st ed. Philadelphia: Saunders;1999. p. 156–68.
Full Text Links
  • JKOS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr