J Korean Ophthalmol Soc.  2011 May;52(5):574-581. 10.3341/jkos.2011.52.5.574.

The Long-Term Observation of Intraocular Pressure after Intravitreal Injections of Bevacizumab, Triamcinolone, and Combination of Both

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Ophthalmology, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. goddns76@hanmail.net

Abstract

PURPOSE
The present study investigates the onset and frequency of increased intraocular pressure (IOP) after injections of intravitreal Bevacizumab, Triamcinolone, and a combination of both drugs.
METHODS
Patients were classified into three groups: Bevacizumab group (group A), Triamcinolone group (group B), and combined drug group (group C), irrespective of the underlying causes. The IOP was measured 30 minutes prior to followed by one day, one week, one month, two months, three months, six months, and one year after injection. The measured IOP at each time point was compared with the pre-injection IOP and the differences in IOP among the three groups were statistically analyzed. The relationships between various factors possible of increasing IOP were also analyzed.
RESULTS
A total of 259 subjects were enrolled in the present study. An IOP increase of more than 5 mm Hg was observed in 25 eyes (15%) in group A, 34 eyes (40%) in group B, and 40 eyes (50%) in group C. There was no statistically significant mean IOP change after injection in group A, but in groups B and C there was an increase in mean IOP up until two and three months after injection, respectively. However, eyes in group A with a history of glaucoma showed statistically significant increases in IOP.
CONCLUSIONS
The onsets and frequencies of increased IOP were different with the different drugs. Proper follow-up for increased IOP after injection is necessary based on the type of drug used.

Keyword

Bevacizumab; Combined drugs; Intraocular pressure; Intravitreal injection; Triamcinolone

MeSH Terms

Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
Eye
Follow-Up Studies
Glaucoma
Humans
Intraocular Pressure
Intravitreal Injections
Triamcinolone
Bevacizumab
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
Triamcinolone

Figure

  • Figure 1. The change of mean intraocular pressure (IOP) during follow up period. Note that the mean IOP of group B increased during post injection 7 to 60 days. The mean IOP of group C increased during post injection 30 to 90 days. The mean IOP of Group A showed no statistically significant change. Group A: Bevacizumab, Group B: Triamcinolone, Group C: Bevacizumab + Triamcinolone. * Post injection days.

  • Figure 2. The percentage of eyes showing increased IOP of more than 5 mmHg at each follow up time. Group B and C showed higher percentages of increased IOP than Group A during post injection 7 to 90 days. There were no statistically significant differences between Group B and C (p > 0.05) during the entire follow up period. Group A: Bevacizumab, Group B: Triamcinolone, Group C: Bevacizumab + Triamcinolone. * Post injection days.


Reference

References

1. Chang MW, Kim SW, Oh IK, et al. Intravitreal triamcinolone injection with or without bevacizumab for diabetic macular edema. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2008; 49:1269–74.
Article
2. Ahmadieh H, Ramezani A, Shoeibi N, et al. Intravitreal bevacizumab with or without triamcinolone for refractory diabetic macular edema; a placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2008; 246:483–9.
Article
3. Ehrlich R, Ciulla TA, Moss AM, Harris A. Combined treatment of intravitreal bevacizumab and intravitreal triamcinolone in patients with retinal vein occlusion: 6 months of follow-up. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2010; 248:375–80.
Article
4. Faghihi H, Roohipoor R, Mohammadi SF, et al. Intravitreal bevacizumab versus combined bevacizumab-triamcinolone versus macular laser photocoagulation in diabetic macular edema. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2008; 18:941–8.
Article
5. Folgosa MS, Messias A, Takata C, et al. Single intravitreal injection of triamcinolone combined with bevacizumab for the treatment of diffuse diabetic macular oedema refractory to grid photocoagulation. Acta Ophthalmol. 2010; 88:e297–8.
Article
6. Jonas JB, Hayler JK, Söfker A, Panda-Jonas S. Intravitreal injection of crystalline cortisone as adjunctive treatment of proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2001; 131:468–71.
Article
7. Park CH, Jaffe GJ, Fekrat S. Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide in eyes with cystoid macular edema associated with central retinal vein occlusion. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003; 136:419–25.
Article
8. Antcliff RJ, Spalton DJ, Stanford MR, et al. Intravitreal triamcinolone for uveitic cystoid macular edema: an optical coherence tomography study. Ophthalmology. 2001; 108:765–72.
Article
9. Danis RP, Ciulla TA, Pratt LM, Anliker W. Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide in exudative age-related macular degeneration. Retina. 2000; 20:244–50.
Article
10. Jonas JB, Kreissig I, Degenring R. Intraocular pressure after intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003; 87:24–7.
Article
11. Jonas JB, Kreissig I, Degenring R, et al. Secondary chronic open-angle glaucoma after intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003; 121:729–30.
Article
12. Roth DB, Realini T, Feuer WJ, et al. Short-term complications of intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide. Retina. 2008; 28:66–70.
Article
13. Smithen LM, Ober MD, Maranan L, Spaide RF. Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide and intraocular pressure. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004; 138:740–3.
Article
14. Jonas JB, Degenring RF, Kreissig I, et al. Intraocular pressure elevation after intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection. Ophthalmology. 2005; 112:593–8.
Article
15. Roth DB, Verma V, Realini T, et al. Long-term incidence and timing of intraocular hypertension after intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection. Ophthalmology. 2009; 116:455–60.
Article
16. Jung JW, Nam DH, Shyn KH. The complications after intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2007; 48:55–62.
17. Kim SJ, Park YM, Lee SU, et al. Short-term safety and efficacy of intravitreal bavacizumab injection. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2009; 50:219–26.
Article
18. Falkenstein IA, Cheng L, Freeman WR. Changes of intraocular pressure after intravitreal injection of bevacizumab (avastin). Retina. 2007; 27:1044–7.
Article
19. Bakri SJ, Larson TA, Edwards AO. Intraocular inflammation following intravitreal injection of bevacizumab. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2008; 246:779–81.
Article
20. Shima C, Sakaguchi H, Gomi F, et al. Complications in patients after intravitreal injection of bevacizumab. Acta Ophthalmologica. 2008; 86:372–6.
Article
21. Ozkiriş A, Erkiliç K. Complications of intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide. Can J Ophthalmol. 2005; 40:63–8.
22. Yang YH, Kim KR, Yang SW, Yim HB. The effect of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide on intraocular pressure. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2004; 45:1081–5.
23. Smithen LM, Ober MD, Maranan L, Spaide RF. Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide and intraocular pressure. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004; 138:740–3.
Article
24. Bakri SJ, Beer PM. The effect of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide on intraocular pressure. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2003; 34:386–90.
Article
25. Park HY, Yi K, Kim HK. Intraocular pressure elevation after intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2005; 19:122–7.
Article
26. Hattenbach LO, Klais C, Koch FH, Gümbel HO. Intravitreous injection of tissue plasminogen activator and gas in the treatment of submacular hemorrhage under various conditions. Ophthalmology. 2001; 108:1485–92.
Article
27. Shin JH, Lee SW, Kim DK, et al. Intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide for macular edema: long-term safety and efficacy after two years. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2007; 48:1670–4.
28. Chung MS, Chang WH. Efficacy of anterior chamber paracentesis in intravitreal triamcinolone injection. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2005; 46:1328–32.
29. Lee MW, Kyung SE, Chang MH. Prophylactic effect of brimoni-dine 0.15% on IOP elevation after intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2008; 49:743–52.
Article
30. Seong HK, Lee JM, Park YS, Lee BR. Immediate natural course of IOP after IVTA and the effect of preoperative ocular massage. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2007; 48:808–14.
31. Kahook MY, Kimura AE, Wong LJ, et al. Sustained elevation in intraocular pressure associated with intravitreal bevacizumab injections. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2009; 40:293–5.
Article
32. Jalil A, Fenerty C, Charles S. Intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) causing acute glaucoma: an unreported complication. Eye. 2007; 21:1541.
Article
33. Kubota T, Okabe H, Hisatomi T, et al. Ultrastructure of the trabecular meshwork in secondary glaucoma eyes after intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide. J Glaucoma. 2006; 15:117–9.
Article
34. Cho P, Lui T. Comparison of the performance of the Nidek NT-2000 noncontact tonometer with the Keeler Pulsair 2000 and the Goldmann applanation tonometer. Optom Vis Sci. 1997; 74:51–8.
Article
35. Audren F, Lecleire-Collet A, Erginay A, et al. Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide for diffuse diabetic macular edema: phase 2 trial comparing 4 mg vs 2 mg. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006; 142:794–9.
Article
36. Lee JM, Kim SJ, Yi KY, Kim HK. Intraocular pressure change after secondary intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2007; 48:97–102.
Full Text Links
  • JKOS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr