1. Bosch WA, Leenders I, Mulder P. Topographic anatomy of the eyelids, and the effects of sex and age. Br J Ophthalmol. 1999; 83:347–52.
2. Pessa JE, Desvigne LD, Lambros VS, et al. Changes in ocular globe-to-orbital rim position with age: implications for aesthetic blepharoplsty of the lower eyelids. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1999; 23:337–42.
3. Richard MJ, Morris C, Deen BF, et al. Analysis of the anatomic changes of the aging facial skeleton using computer-assisted tomography. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009; 25:382–6.
Article
4. Jelks GW, Jelks EB. Preoperative evaluation of the blepharoplasty patient. Bypassing the pitfalls. Clin Plast Surg. 1993; 20:213–23.
5. Moon CS, Moon SH, Jang JW. Topographic anatomic difference of the eyelid according to age in Korean. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2003; 44:1865–71.
6. Levine RA, Garza JR, Wang PT, et al. Adult facial growth: applications to anesthetic surgery. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2003; 27:265–8.
7. Pessa JE, Chen Y. Curve analysis of the aging orbital aperture. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002; 109:751–5.
Article
8. Jelks GW, Jelks EB. The influence of orbital and eyelid anatomy on the palpebral aperture. Clin Plast Surg. 1991; 18:183–95.
Article
9. Pessa JE. The potential role of stereolithography in the study of facial aging. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001; 119:117–20.
Article
10. Byrd HS, Burt JD. Achieving aesthetic balance in the brow, eyelids, and midface. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002; 110:926–33.
Article