J Korean Surg Soc.  1999 May;56(5):615-625.

The Effect of Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor, Glutamine and Antibiotic on the Bacterial Translocation in the Endotoxemic Rats

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Yeungnam University.
  • 2Department of Pathology, College of Medicine, Yeungnam University.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Now, there is good evidence suggesting that the gastrointestinal tract is not simply a bystander organ in critically ill patients but also may serve as an initiator and stimulator of a generalized systemic inflammatory response, and may function as the "motor" of sepsis and the MOFS (multiple organ failure syndrom). The aim of this study was to investigate the pattern of bacterial translocation and the effects of the granulocyte colony stimulating factor, enteral glutamine and prophylactic antibiotic on the bacterial translocation in endotoxemic rats.
METHODS
Thiry-Vella loops were made in 80 male Sprague-Dawley rats weighing between 250 and 300 g. After 7 days, they were arbitrarily divided into 4 groups (control, G-CSF, glutamine and antibiotic groups). After inducing endotoxemia, the same amount of radiolabelled E. coli (500,000 CPU/ml) was insufflated through the Thiry-Vella loop. Then, after 4 hours, radioactivities of the lung, the liver, the spleen, the kidney, and serum (CPM gm wet wt.) were measured with a Wallac 1410. To investigate the pattern of bacterial translocation, we divided the control group into 2 subgroups and harvested each organ at 1 hour and 4 hours after inducing endotoxemia.
RESULTS
The organ distribution of radiolabelled E. coli differed with the lapse of time. Bacterial translocation was observed as early as 1 hour, and significantly higher levels of radioactivity were observed in the lung at 1 hour, and in the liver at 4 hours after endotoxemia than were observed in the other organs (P<0.01). G-CSF, glutamine and a prophylactic antibiotic could prevent the bacterial translocation in endotoxemic rats. Also, bacterial translocation was significantly reduced in the glutamine group compared with the G-CSF and the prophylactic antibiotic group (P<0.05). However, there was no difference in mucosa atrophy (villous height/mucosa thickness) among the group.
CONCLUSIONS
The results suggested that bacterial translocation could be prevented with G-CSF, glutamine, and prophylactic antibiotics and it might be hopeful in treating the patients suffering from shock, sepsis, trauma, and surgical stress.

Keyword

Bacterial translocation; G-CSF; Glutamine; Antibiotic

MeSH Terms

Animals
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Atrophy
Bacterial Translocation*
Colony-Stimulating Factors*
Critical Illness
Endotoxemia
Gastrointestinal Tract
Glutamine*
Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor
Granulocytes*
Hope
Humans
Kidney
Liver
Lung
Male
Mucous Membrane
Radioactivity
Rats*
Rats, Sprague-Dawley
Sepsis
Shock
Spleen
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Colony-Stimulating Factors
Glutamine
Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor
Full Text Links
  • JKSS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr