J Korean Med Assoc.  2015 Apr;58(4):336-348. 10.5124/jkma.2015.58.4.336.

The state of medical malpractice caused by private practice physicians (2010-2012): analysis through incident reports at Korean Medical Association Medical Indemnities Mutuals

• Kim KH
• Choi JW
• Lee ES

• KMID: 2194966
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2015.58.4.336

Abstract

This study was conducted to understand the current state of medical malpractice through analyzing recorded incidents by characteristics of medical intervention, and treatment results classified by treatment type and so on. The data for this study were extracted from the recorded incidents of medical malpractices committed by private practice physicians, which were provided by the Korean Medical Association Medical Indemnity Mutuals (KMAMA). The analysis was based on the treatment codes registered as primary medical practice of the respective private practice physicians at the time of joining KMAMA Medical malpractice occurrence rate by region was highest in Daegu with 7.1%. Analysis of causes of malpractice by codes showed dermatology/urology/plastic surgery department's C5 (standard medical care [outpatient] including standard injection, drug administration, simple topical anesthesia, simple treatment+regional anesthesia [spinal/epidural anesthesia]+general anesthesia [intravenous/inhaled anesthesia]) had the highest number of incidents with 223 cases. For the cases of death as prognosis, code B2, consisting of "basic treatment+regional anesthesia, intra-articular injection, epidural nerve block," had the highest incidents. This study concluded with the suggestion for the need to establish a system that will allow reporting and sharing incidents of private practice medical malpractice, and the necessity of acknowledging the importance of sharing such knowledge among medical practitioners.

Keyword

Medical disputes; Medical malpractice; Physicians; Patients; Medical errors

MeSH Terms

Anesthesia
Daegu
Humans
Injections, Intra-Articular
Malpractice*
Medical Errors
Private Practice*
Prognosis

Reference

1. Kim KH, Song DJ, Lee ES, Park MS, Ahn HR. Research on meditation strategy and reputation recovery particulars regarding medical accidents. Seoul: Korean Medical Association;2013.

2. Lee JC, Min HY, Kim KH, Kim HN. Factors associated with the malpractice settlement cost between doctors and patients in Korea. Health Soc Sci. 2010; 28:171–196.

3. Sohn MS, Min HY, Lee IH, Lee MJ. Total cost estimation of malpractice disputes in Korea. Korean J Med Law. 2005; 13:57–76.

4. Lee IH, Lee IO. Questionnaire study about responsible parties in medical malpractice. Korean J Med Law. 2005; 13:63–70.

5. Baicker K, Chandra A. Defensive medicine and disappearing doctors. Regulation. 2005; 28:24–31.

6. Stewart RM, Johnston J, Geoghegan K, Anthony T, Myers JG, Dent DL, Corneille MG, Danielson DS, Root HD, Pruitt BA Jr, Cohn SM. Trauma surgery malpractice risk: perception versus reality. Ann Surg. 2005; 241:969–975.

7. Choi HS. A study on the medical accident and malpractice relief aystem in Korea. Wonkwang J Law Res. 2010; 26:539–562.

8. Korea Consumer Agency. Annual report and casebook on consumer remedy damage. Seoul: Korea Consumer Agency;2011.

9. Shim JH, Lee KS, Shim JJ, Yoon SM, Doh JW, Bae HG. Analysis of precedents related to the medical accidents of neurosurgery. Korean J Neurotrauma. 2012; 8:32–36.

10. Nakajima K, Keyes C, Kuroyanagi T, Tatara K. Medical malpractice and legal resolution systems in Japan. JAMA. 2001; 285:1632–1640.

11. Yasunaga H. Legal intervention against medical accidents in Japan. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2008; 1:39–42.

12. Lee SY, Kim AJ, Lee SH, Shin JH. Activating the medical accident damage relief and medical dispute mediation law [Internet]. Seoul: Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs;2012. cited 2015 Jan 14. Available from: http://repository.kihasa.re.kr:8080/bitstream/201002/9821/1/연구_2012-59.pdf.

13. Lee SI. Improvement of medical treatment quality through patient safety control. Seoul: Policy for Healthcare Facilities and Medicine;2012.

14. Min HY, Sohn MS, Kim KK. A rational scheme for medical malpractice compensation in OBGYN: focusing on a structural analysis by types. Korean J Med Law. 2004; 12:63–100.

15. Im BH. Analysis of medical disputes precedent. J Korea Contents Assoc. 2010; 10:294–303.

16. Korea Health Industry Development Institute. Medical resource statistics handbook [Internet]. Cheongju: Korea Health Industry Development Institute;2012. cited 2015 Mar 17. Available from: http://khiss.go.kr/.

17. Korean Statistical Information Service. Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service medical resources statistics system [Internet]. Deajeon: Statistics Korea;2014. cited 2015 Jan 14. Available from: http://kosis.kr/statisticsList/statisticsList_01List.jsp?vwcd=MT_OTITLE&parmTabId=M_01_02&isAdmin=false&parentId=1211035&listLev=2.

18. Hwang MS. The legal scheme for resolving conflicts between patients and physicians. Seoul: National Research Council for Economics, Humanities and Social Sciences Cooperative Research Studies;2005.

19. Shin EH. A study for analysis of the current status of medical disputes and the characteristics by medical department: centered on the data of 2006 Korea Consumer Agency. Seoul: Yonsei University;2007.

20. Korean Institute of Medicine. Strategy alternatives of malpractice prevention using the systematic analysis of medical service's type. Seoul: Korean Institute of Medicine;2003.

21. Asian Institute for Bioethics and Health Law. Research on medical malpractice prevention programs for foreign patients. Cheonju: Korea Health Industry Development Institute;2009.

22. Kim SH, Park HW. A study on preventive strategies of medical accident through analyzing medical disputes- centered on foreign patients. Korean J Med Law. 2012; 20:95–120.

23. Lee DY. Identifying causes of pediatric malpractice and developing measures to prevent recurrence through an analysis of court decisions on medical disputes in pediatrics [dissertation]. Seoul: Yonsei University;2014.

24. Kim JH. Current situation and related issues on medical malpractice: an approach form medical sociological perspective. Korean J Sociol. 1998; 32:395–426.

25. Cho BH. Attitudes of Taegu citizens on medical malpractice and conflicts. Korean Assoc Health Med Sociol. 1997; 2:85–105.

26. Kim EJ. Developing a process model for crisis management communication about medical dispute. Health Soc Welf Rev. 2012; 32:391–428.

27. Cho HS, Lee SH, Shon MS, Yang SH, Lee HR. Reasons why patients and families choose medical dispute. J Korean Acad Fam Med. 1998; 19:274–291.

28. You H. Civil liability for medical malpractice. J Korean Med Assoc. 2013; 56:648–654.

29. Rhee HS, Lee JH, Rhim KH, Choi MK. The thoughts of patients on medical accidents and disputes in Korea. Korean J Hosp Manage. 2006; 11:1–30.

30. Lee MK. The effects of apology and general trust on anger and forgiveness in medical malpractice [dissertation]. Seoul: Chung-Ang University;2011.

31. Beck RS, Daughtridge R, Sloane PD. Physician-patient communication in the primary care office: a systematic review. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2002; 15:25–38.

32. Beckman HB, Markakis KM, Suchman AL, Frankel RM. The doctor-patient relationship and malpractice: lessons from plaintiff depositions. Arch Intern Med. 1994; 154:1365–1370.

33. Levinson W, Roter DL, Mullooly JP, Dull VT, Frankel RM. Physician-patient communication. The relationship with malpractice claims among primary care physicians and surgeons. JAMA. 1997; 277:553–559.