J Korean Med Assoc.  2013 Oct;56(10):899-907. 10.5124/jkma.2013.56.10.899.

Primary care research in South Korea: its importance and enhancing strategies for enhancement

• Kim YI
• Hong JY
• Kim K
• Goh E
• Sung NJ

• KMID: 2193414
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2013.56.10.899

Abstract

Lively discussion has been underway regarding primary care in South Korea as an alternative medical policy in the face of rising medical costs and health care disparities. However, the lack of research about primary care in South Korea makes it difficult to move policymakers, so it is time to enhance primary care research in South Korea. Primary care research can be defined as research directed toward the better understanding and practice of the primary care function. Primary care research traditionally has included basic research, clinical research, health services research related to primary care, health systems research, and research on primary care training; and each field is complementary. In primary care research, participation of primary care physicians is essential because primary care research is different from other conventional studies of disease prevalence, patient characteristics, diagnostic methods, and the treatment environment. Primary care research findings in other countries cannot be applied to South Korea as the characteristics of the health system and medical practice are different. To enhance the research on primary care in South Korea, financial assistance, promoting the research capacity of primary care physicians, and more attention from primary care physicians to research are needed.

Keyword

Primary health care; Research; Republic of Korea; Promotion; Strategy

MeSH Terms

Health Services Research
Healthcare Disparities
Humans
Physicians, Primary Care
Prevalence
Primary Health Care
Republic of Korea

Reference

1. Ministry of Health and Welfare. Korean national health accounts and total health expenditure in 2010. Seoul: Ministry of Health and Welfare;2011.

2. Hummers-Pradier E, Beyer M, Chevallier P, Cos X, Eilat-Tsanani S, Fink W, Lionis C, Peremans L, Petek D, Rurik I, Soler JK, Stoffers HE, Topsever P, Ungan M, van Marwijk H, van Royen P. Research agenda for general practice/family medicine and primary health care in Europe [Internet]. Maastricht: European General Practice Research Network;2010. cited 2013 Oct 2. Available from: http://www.egprn.org/files/userfiles/file/RA%20Summary%20EGPRN.pdf.

3. Mold JW, Green LA. Primary care research: revisiting its definition and rationale. J Fam Pract. 2000; 49:206–208.

4. Beasley JW, Starfield B, van Weel C, Rosser WW, Haq CL. Global health and primary care research. J Am Board Fam Med. 2007; 20:518–526.

5. Lam CL. The 21st century: the age of family medicine research? Ann Fam Med. 2004; 2:Suppl 2. S50–S54.

6. Starfield B. Primary care: balancing health needs, services, and technology. New York: Oxford University Press;1998.

7. Macinko J, Starfield B, Erinosho T. The impact of primary healthcare on population health in low- and middle-income countries. J Ambul Care Manage. 2009; 32:150–171.

8. Shi L. The impact of primary care: a focused review. Scientifica. 2012; 1–22.

9. Campbell S, Reeves D, Kontopantelis E, Middleton E, Sibbald B, Roland M. Quality of primary care in England with the introduction of pay for performance. N Engl J Med. 2007; 357:181–190.

10. Safran DG, Rogers WH, Tarlov AR, Inui T, Taira DA, Montgomery JE, Ware JE, Slavin CP. Organizational and financial characteristics of health plans: are they related to primary care performance? Arch Intern Med. 2000; 160:69–76.

11. Momany ET, Flach SD, Nelson FD, Damiano PC. A cost analysis of the Iowa Medicaid primary care case management program. Health Serv Res. 2006; 41(4 Pt 1):1357–1371.

12. Beal A, Hernandez S, Doty M. Latino access to the patient-centered medical home. J Gen Intern Med. 2009; 24:Suppl 3. 514–520.

13. Spann SJ, Nutting PA, Galliher JM, Peterson KA, Pavlik VN, Dickinson LM, Volk RJ. Management of type 2 diabetes in the primary care setting: a practice-based research network study. Ann Fam Med. 2006; 4:23–31.

14. Westfall JM, VanVorst RF, Main DS, Herbert C. Community-based participatory research in practice-based research networks. Ann Fam Med. 2006; 4:8–14.

15. Seo HG. Research of family medicine. J Korean Acad Fam Med. 1994; 15:3–17.

16. Youn BB, Lee HR, Kwak KW, Lee YJ, Lee HS, Oh MK. Analysis of the clinical contents of primary care in Korea. J Korean Acad Fam Med. 1989; 10:1–15.

17. Jeong JW, Sung NJ. Present status of papers on the primary care quality assessment in Korea. Korean J Fam Med. 2009; 30:525–532.

18. Lee JH, Choi YJ, Volk RJ, Kim SY, Kim YS, Park HK, Jeon TH, Hong SK, Spann SJ. Defining the concept of primary care in South Korea using a Delphi method. Fam Med. 2007; 39:425–431.

19. Lee JH, Choi YJ, Sung NJ, Kim SY, Chung SH, Kim J, Jeon TH, Park HK. Korean Primary Care Research Group. Development of the Korean primary care assessment tool: measuring user experience: tests of data quality and measurement performance. Int J Qual Health Care. 2009; 21:103–111.

20. Park JH, Kim KW, Sung NJ, Choi YG, Lee JH. Korean Primary Care Research Group. Association between primary care quality and health behaviors in patients with essential hypertension who visit a family physician as a usual source of care. Korean J Fam Med. 2011; 32:104–111.

21. Sung NJ, Markuns JF, Park KH, Kim K, Lee H, Lee JH. Higher quality primary care is associated with good self-rated health status. Fam Pract. 2013; 30:568–575.

22. Lee JH, Choi YJ, Lee SH, Sung NJ, Kim SY, Hong JY. Association of the length of doctor-patient relationship with primary care quality in seven family practices in Korea. J Korean Med Sci. 2013; 28:508–515.

23. Jung JW, Sung NJ, Park KH, Kim SW, Lee JH. Patients' assessment of community primary and non-primary care physicians in Seoul city of South Korea. Korean J Fam Med. 2011; 32:226–233.

24. Sung NJ, Suh SY, Lee DW, Ahn HY, Choi YJ, Lee JH. Korean Primary Care Research Group. Patient's assessment of primary care of medical institutions in South Korea by structural type. Int J Qual Health Care. 2010; 22:493–499.

25. Ahn SH. Assessment of primary care level in Korea and comparison with the developed countries. J Korean Acad Fam Med. 2001; 22:483–497.

26. Jung YS. Introduction to Cheonan primary care research network. J Korean Acad Fam Med. 1998; 19:1084–1087.

27. Jang CW, Ha KH, Sung NJ, Lee DW, Cho KR, Jung SH, Choi S, Ki JM, Kim SW, Choi KJ, Kim DI, Song JS, Choi YK, Song HN, Park KH. Selection of antihypertensive drugs in hypertensive patients with diabetes mellitus: in Pohang-Gyeongju primary care research network. J Korean Acad Fam Med. 2006; 27:706–712.

28. Lee SH, Paek YJ, Kim SY, Oh SW, Shim JY, Lee JK. Research and scholarly activity of residency programs of family medicine in Korea. J Korean Acad Fam Med. 2004; 25:826–834.

29. Young RA, DeHaven MJ, Passmore C, Baumer JG, Smith KV. Research funding and mentoring in family medicine residencies. Fam Med. 2007; 39:410–418.

30. Neale AV. A national survey of research requirements for family practice residents and faculty. Fam Med. 2002; 34:262–267.

31. Seehusen DA, Weaver SP. Resident research in family medicine: where are we now? Fam Med. 2009; 41:663–668.

32. Carek PJ, Jafri A. Promoting scholarly activity in family medicine residency programs: what's the reward? Ann Fam Med. 2004; 2:520–521.