J Korean Hip Soc.  2011 Mar;23(1):39-46. 10.5371/jkhs.2011.23.1.39.

Results of the Proximal Femoral Nail-Antirotation (PFNA) in Patients with an Unstable Pertrochanteric Fracture

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Sang-Gye Paik Hospital, College of Medicine, Inje University, Seoul, Korea. ybs58@paik.ac.kr

Abstract

PURPOSE
This study was performed to review the results of PFNA (Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation) for treating unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Forty-seven out of 187 hips treated from September 2006 to March 2010 with PFNA for unstable femoral pertrochanteric fractures were enrolled in this study. The mean duration to radiologic bone union, the functional status and the complications were assessed. The Cleveland index, the tip apex distance, the sliding distance of the blade and the change in the neck-shaft angle were also measured.
RESULTS
The mean duration to radiologic bone union was 15.8 weeks and 66% of the patients recovered to a premorbid functional status. The average amount of blade sliding was 5.5 mm and the mean change of the neck-shaft angle was varus 4.4degrees. There were 2 cases of penetration of the blade tip, 2 cases of impending penetration, one case of posttraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head and 2 cases of lateral wall fractures.
CONCLUSION
PFNA would be preferable for unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures in terms of the short operation time, the rapid ambulatory recovery and the reduced complications. Yet careful handling is required to avoid a grave complication such as head penetration.

Keyword

Femur; Unstable pertrochanteric fracture; PFNA (Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation)

MeSH Terms

Femur
Handling (Psychology)
Head
Hip
Hip Fractures
Humans
Nails
Osteonecrosis

Figure

  • Fig. 1 The Cleveland Index.

  • Fig. 2 (A) Preoperative antero-posterior (AP) radiograph of a 81 year-old woman shows A.O classification 2.3 intertrochanteric fracture. (B) Four months after internal fixation with PFNA, AP radiograph shows solid fracture-union.

  • Fig. 3 (A) Preoperative antero-posterior (AP) radiograph of a 75 year-old female shows AO classification 2.2 intertrochanteric fracture. (B) Three weeks after internal fixation with PFNA, AP radiograph shows lateral wall fracture. (C) After conservative treatment, radiograph shows union of lateral wall fracture.

  • Fig. 4 (A) Preoperative antero-posterior (AP) radiograph of a 71 year-old female shows AO classification 2.2 intertrochanteric fracture. (B) Immediate postoperative AP radiograph shows internal fixation with PFNA. (C) AP radiograph 2 months after the operation shows blade penetration into the hip joint. (D) The blade was exchanged into shorter one. (E) Four months after the 2nd operation, AP radiograph shows union.


Reference

1. Hwang DS, Rhee KJ, Choi JH. Recovery of walking ability after treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients: comparision of compression hip screw to primary hemiarthroplasty. J Korean Hip Soc. 1999. 11:22–29.
2. Lee JY, Lee SY. Treatment of the proximal femoral extracapsular fracture with proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA): comparision with proximal femoral nail (PFN). J Korean Hip Soc. 2007. 19:183–189.
Article
3. Richmond J, Aharonoff GB, Zuckerman JD, Koval KJ. Mortality risk after hip fracture 2003. J Orthop Trauma. 2003. 17:8 Suppl. S2–S5.
4. Evans EM. Trochanteric fractures; a review of 110 cases treated by nail-plate fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1951. 33B:192–204.
5. Flores LA, Harrington IJ, Heller M. The stability of intertrochanteric fractures treated with a sliding screw-plate. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990. 72:37–40.
Article
6. Pugh WL. A self-adjusting nail-plate for fractures about the hip joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1955. 37-A:1085–1093.
Article
7. Davis TR, Sher JL, Horsman A, Simpson M, Proter BB, Checketts RG. Intertrochanteric femoral fractures. Mechanical failure after internal fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990. 72:26–31.
Article
8. Madsen JE, Naess L, Aune AK, Alho A, Ekeland A, strømsøe K. Dynamic hip screw with trochanteric stabilizing plate in the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures: a comparative study with the Gamma nail and compression hip screw. J Orthop Trauma. 1998. 12:241–248.
Article
9. Rha JD, Kim YH, Yoon SI, Park TS, Lee MH. Factors affecting sliding of the lag screw in intertrochanteric fractures. Int Orthop. 1993. 17:320–324.
Article
10. Adams CI, Robinson CM, Courl-Brown CM, McQueen MM. Prospective randomized controlled trial of an intramedullary nail versus dynamic screw and plate for intertrochanteric fractures of the femur. J Orthop Trauma. 2001. 15:394–400.
Article
11. Albareda J, Laderiga A, Palanca D, Paniagua L, Seral F. Complications and technical problems with the gamma nail. Int Orthop. 1996. 20:47–50.
Article
12. Friedl W, Colombo-Benkmann M, Dockter S, Machens HG, Mieck U. Gamma nail osteosynthesis of per- and subtrochanteric femoral fractures. 4 years experiences and their consequences for further implant development. Chirurg. 1994. 65:953–963.
13. Simmermacher RK, Bosch AM, Van der Werken C. The AO/ASIF-proximal femoral nail (PFN): a new device for the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures. Injury. 1999. 30:327–332.
Article
14. Cleveland M, Bosworth DM, Thompson FR, Wilson HJ Jr, Ishizuka T. A ten-year analysis of intertrochanteric fractures of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1959. 41-A:1399–1408.
Article
15. Baumgaertner MR, Curtin SL, Lindskog DM, Keggi JM. The value of the tip-apex distance in predicting failure of fixation of peritrochanteric fractures of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995. 77:1058–1064.
Article
16. Koval KJ, Skovron ML, Aharonoff GB, Meadows SE, Zuckerman JD. Ambulatory ability after hip fracture. A prospective study in geriatric patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995. 310:150–159.
17. Choo SK, Oh HK, Kim YC, Lee DB. Excessive sliding of compression hip screw for the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture in elderly. J Korean Hip Soc. 2007. 19:190–196.
Article
18. Koval KJ, Zuckerman JD. Hip fractures: I. Overview and evaluation and treatment of femoral-neck fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1994. 2:141–149.
Article
19. Koval KJ, Zuckerman JD. Hip fractures: II. Evaluation and treatment of intertrochanteric fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1994. 2:150–156.
Article
20. Leung KS, Chen CM, So WS, et al. Multicenter trial of modified Gamma nail in East Asia. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996. 323:146–154.
Article
21. Radford PJ, Needoff M, Webb JK. A prospective randomised comparision of the dynamic hip screw and the gamma locking nail. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993. 75:789–793.
22. Ahn SJ, Park JH. Proximal femoral nail (PFN) for the treatment of the femoral trochanteric fracture. J Korean Fract Soc. 2004. 17:7–12.
Article
23. Boldin C, Seibert FJ, Frankhauser F, Peicha G, Grechenig W, Szyszhowitz R. The proximal femoral nail (PFN)--a minimal invasive treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures: a proxpective study of 55 patients with a follow-up of 15 months. Acta Orthop Scand. 2003. 74:53–58.
Article
24. Kim BS, Lew SW, Ko SH, Cho SD, Yang JH, Park MS. Treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fracture with proximal femoral nail. J Korean Fract Soc. 2004. 17:1–6.
Article
25. Sung YB, Sohn YJ, Yum JK, et al. Proximal femoral nail (PFN) for intertrochanteric fracture: long-term follow up results. J Korean Hip Soc. 2005. 17:141–148.
26. Papasimos S, Koutsojannis CM, Panagopoulos A, Megas P, Lambiris E. A randomised comparison of AMBI, TGN and PFN for treatment of unstable trochanteric fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2005. 125:462–468.
Article
27. Moon YW, Suh DH, Kang ST, Kwon DJ, Ji YN, Lee KB. The proximal femoral nail for intertrochanteric fracture of the femur. J Korean Soc Fract. 2003. 16:29–36.
Article
28. Steinberg GG, Desai SS, Kornwitz NA, Sullivan TJ. The intertrochanteric hip fracture. A retrospective analysis. Orthopedics. 1988. 11:265–273.
Article
29. Yoo JH, Park JS, Noh KC, et al. The results of proximal femoral nail antirotation: a comparative study with proximal femoral nail. J Korean Hip Soc. 2008. 20:286–292.
Article
30. Lee KJ, Min BW, Cho CH, Song KS, Bae KC, Kim SG. Results of treating senile osteoporotic peritrochanteric fracture with proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA). J Korean Hip Soc. 2009. 21:162–168.
Article
31. Liu Y, Tao R, Liu F, et al. Mid-term outcomes after intramedullary fixation of peritrochanteric femoral fractures using the new proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA). Injury. 2010. 41:810–817.
Article
32. Mulholland RC, Gunn DR. Sliding screw plate fixation of intertrochanteric femoral fractures. J Trauma. 1972. 12:581–591.
Article
33. Nunn D. Sliding hip screws and medial displacement osteotomy. J R Soc Med. 1988. 81:140–142.
Article
34. Thomas AP. Dynamic hip screws that fail. Injury. 1991. 22:45–46.
Article
35. Gundle R, Gargan MF, Simpson AH. How to minimize failures of fixation of unstable intertrochanteric fractures. Injury. 1995. 26:611–614.
Article
36. Kyle RF, Gustilo RB, Premer RF. Analysis of six hundred and twenty-two intertrochanteric hip fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1979. 61:216–221.
Article
37. Jensen JS. Classification of trochanteric fractures. Acta Orthop Scand. 1980. 51:803–810.
Article
38. Simmermacher RK, Ljungqvist J, Bail H, et al. The new proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) in daily practice: results of a multicentre clinical study. Injury. 2008. 39:932–939.
Article
39. Brunner A, Jöckel JA, Babst R. The PFNA proximal femur nail in treatment of unstable proximal femur fracture--3 cases of postoperative perforation of the helical blade into the hip joint. J Orthop Trauma. 2008. 22:731–736.
Article
40. Lucke M, Burghardt RD, Siebenlist S, Ganslmeier A, Stöckle U. Medial migration of lag screw with intrapelvic dislocation in gamma nailing--a unique problem? A report of 2 cases. J Orthop Trauma. 2010. 24:e6–e11.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKHS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2022 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr