J Korean Med Assoc.  2006 Jan;49(1):70-77. 10.5124/jkma.2006.49.1.70.

A Recent Overview of Varicose Vein in the Legs

• Cho KJ

• KMID: 2184638
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2006.49.1.70

Abstract

Varicose vein is one of the ancient diseases, which has its evidence in Greek sculpture. Nowadays varicose vein has become a popular disease because of the media, so that many people want to treat their varicose vein and many medical doctors from a variety of fields seek a varicose clinic, accordingly. Since the introduction of the great saphenous vein stripping, the treatment of varicose vein has not been changed very much for about 100 years. Recently, however, many doctors in the outpatient varicose clinic prefer less invasive treatment and some innovative techniques that have become available recently. Endovascular treatment or transilluminated powered phlebectomy is one of them. Some dermatologists try to treat all kinds of varicose vein with sclerotherapy. But the long-term results of the treatment reveal that the gold standard of the treatment of typical varicose vein is a groin-to-knee inversion stripping of the great saphenous vein with stab avulsion of the varicose cluster. The application of the color Doppler duplex ultrasonogram to the leg vein has made it possible to evaluate the reflux of axial veins and perforator veins more thoroughly and less invasively. Therefore ultrasonography is the method of choice for the diagnosis of varicose vein preoperatively and postoperative follow-up studies for recurrent cases. The recurrence of varicose vein after treatment is mostly from the remnant reflux in the saphenofemoral junction and its tributary. Thus more meticulous treatment of the tributaries of saphenofemoral junction is needed.

Keyword

Varicose vein

MeSH Terms

Diagnosis
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Leg*
Outpatients
Recurrence
Saphenous Vein
Sclerotherapy
Sculpture
Ultrasonography
Varicose Veins*
Veins

Reference

1. Browse LN, Burnand KG, Thomas ML. Diseases of the veinspathology, diagnosis and treatment. 1988. London: Edward Arnold;53–69.

2. John JB. Evaluation of varicose vein surgery. Advances in vascular surgery. 1998. vol 6. St Luis: Mosby;81–91.

3. Arnoldi CC. The aetiology of primary varicose veins. Dan Med Bull. 1957. 4:102–107.

4. Dodd H, Cockett FB. The pathology and surgery of the veins of the lower extremities. 1956. Edinburgh: Livingston;3–8.

5. Allegra C, Antignani PL, Bergan JJ, Carpentier PH, Coleridge-Smith P, Widmer MT, et al. The "C" of CEAP: Suggested definitions and refinements: An international union of phlebology conference of experts. J Vasc Surg. 2003. 37:129–131.

6. Bergan JJ. Rutherford RB, editor. Varicose veins: treatment by intervention including sclerotherapy. Vascular surgery. 2005. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders;2251–2267.

7. Goren G, Yellin AE. Primary varicose veins: Topographic and hemodynamic correlations. J Cardiovasc Surg. 1990. 31:672–679.

8. Bergen JJ. Hubson RW, Wilson SE, Veith FJ, editors. Etiology and surgical management of varicose veins. Vascular surgery-principles and practice. 2004. 3rd ed. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc;949–962.

9. Madar G, Widmer L. Varicose veins and chronic venous insufficiency: disorder or disease? A critical epidemiological review. Vasa. 1986. 15:126–134.

10. Iafrati MD, O'Donnell TF Jr. Ascher E, editor. Varicose vein. Haimovici's vascular surgery. 2004. 5th ed. Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishing;1058–1072.

11. Cornu-Thenard A, Boivin P, Baud JM. Importance of the familial factors in varicose disease. Clinical study of 134 families. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1994. 20:318–326.

12. Van Cleef JF. A vein has a preferential axis of flattening. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1993. 19:468–470.

13. Thulesius O, Ugaily-Thulesius L. The varicose saphenous vein, functional and ultrastructual studies, with special reference to smooth muscle. Phlebology. 1988. 3:89–95.

14. Takase S, Schmid-Schonbein GW, Bergan JJ. Expression of adhesion molecules and cytokines on saphenous veins in chronic venous insufficiency. Ann Vasc Surg. 2000. 14:427–435.

15. Neumann HAM. Ambulant minisurgical phlebectomy. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1992. 18:53–58.

16. McMullin GM, Coleridge-Smith PD, Scurr JH. Objective assessment of high ligation without stripping the long saphenous vein. Br J Surg. 1991. 78:1139–1143.

17. Rutherford RB, Sawyer JD, Jones DN. The fate of residual saphenous vein after partial removal or ligation. J Vasc Surg. 1990. 12:422–428.

18. Friedell ML, Samson RH, Cohen MJ. High ligation of the greater saphenous vein for treatment of lower extremity varicosities: the fate of the vein and therapeutic results. Ann Vasc Surg. 1992. 6:5–8.

19. McMullin GM, Coleridge-Smith PD, Scurr JH. Objective assessment of high ligation without stripping the long saphenous vein. Br J Surg. 1991. 78:1139–1142.

20. Kabnick LS, Merchant RF. Twelve- and 24-month followup after endovascular obliteration of saphenous reflux: A report from the multicenter register. J Phlebol. 2001. 1:17–23.

21. Goldman MP. Closure of the greater saphenous vein with endoluminal radiofrequency thermal heating of the vein wall in combination with ambulatory phlebectomy: Preliminary 6-month followup. Dermatol Surg. 2000. 26:105.

22. Pichot O, Sessa C, Chandler JG, Nuta M, Perrin M. Role of duplex imaging in endovenous obliteration for primary venous insufficiency. J Endovasc Ther. 2000. 7:451–459.

23. Chandler JG, Pichot O, Sessa C, Schuller-Petrovic S, Osse FJ, Bergan JJ. Defining the role of extended saphenofemoral junction ligation: A prostective comparative study. J Vasc Surg. 2000. 32:941–953.

24. Spitz GA, Braxton JM, Bergan JJ. Outpatient varicose vein surgery with transilluminated powered phlebectomy. Vasc Surg. 2000. 34:547–555.

26. Belcaro G, Nicolaides AN, Ricci A, Dugall M, Errichi BM, Christopoulos D, et al. Endovascular sclerotherapy, surgery, and surgery plus sclerotherapy for superficial venous incompetence: A randomized 10-year followup trial: Final results. Angiology. 2000. 5:529–534.

27. Thibault PK, Lewis WA. Recurrent varicose veins: Evaluation utilizing duplex venous imaging. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1992. 18:618–624.

28. Redwood NFW, Lambert D. Patterns of reflux in recurrent varicose veins assessed by duplex scanning. Br J Surg. 1994. 81:1450–1451.

29. Dwerryhouse S, Davies B, Harradine K, Earnshaw JJ. Stripping the long saphenous vein reduces the rate of reoperation for recurrent varicose veins: five-year results of a randomized trial. J Vasc Surg. 1999. 28:589–592.

30. Fischer R, Linde N, Duff C, Jeanneret C, Chandler JG, Seeber P. Late recurrent saphenofemoral junction reflux after ligation and stripping of the greater saphenous vein. J Vasc Surg. 2001. 34:236–240.