J Korean Acad Conserv Dent.  2003 Nov;28(6):467-474. 10.5395/JKACD.2003.28.6.467.

Microleakage at the cervical margin of Class II composite restorations with different intermediate layer treatments

• Kim KO

• KMID: 2175621
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2003.28.6.467

Abstract

No abstract available.

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1 Scores of microleakage (×25): (a) score 1, (b) score 2, (c) score 3

• 

  Fig. 2 Mean scores of microleakage of each groups ar gingival margins.

Reference

1. Geurtsen W, Schoeler J. 4-year retrospective clinical study of class I and II composite fillings. J Dent. 1997. 25:229–232.

2. Hickel R, Manhart J. Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure. J Adhes Dent. 2001. 3:45–64.

3. Rasmusson CG, Lundin SA. Class II restorations in six different posterior composite resins: Five year results. Swed Dent J. 1995. 19:173–182.

4. Wilson NHF, Wilson MA, Wastell DG, Smith GA. Performance of occlusin in butt-joint and bevel-edged preparations: Five year results. Dent Mater. 1991. 7:92–98.

5. Dietschi D, Siebenthal G, Neveu-Rosenstand L, Holtz J. Influence of the restorative technique and new adhesives on the dentin marginal seal and adaptation of resin composite Class II restorations: an in vitro evaluation. Quintessence Int. 1995. 26:717–727.

6. Dietschi D, Herzfeld D. In vitro evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation of class II resin composite restorations after thermal and occlusal stressing. Eur J Oral Sci. 1998. 106:1033–1042.

7. Hilton TJ, Schwartz RS, Ferracane JL. Microleakage of four Class II resin composite insertion techniques at intraoral temperature. Quintessence Int. 1997. 28:135–144.

8. Davidson CL, Feilzer AJ. Polymerization shrinkage and polymerization shrinkage stress in polymer-based restoratives. J Dent. 1997. 25:435–440.

9. Davidson CL. Glass-ionomer bases under posterior composites. J Esthet Dent. 1994. 223–224.

10. van Dijken JW. A 6-year evaluation of a direct composite resin inlay/onlay system and glass ionomer cement-composite resin sandwich restorations. Acta Odontol Scand. 1994. 52:368–376.

11. Hagge MS, Lindemuth JS, Mason JF, Simon JF. Effect of four intermediate layer treatments on microleakage of Class composite restorations. Gen Dent. 2001. 49:489–495.

12. Hannig M, Bott B, Hohnk HD, Muhlbauer EA. A new concept for tooth-colored Class II restoration with proximal margins located in dentin. J Dent Res. 1997. 76:314. Abstr 2403.

13. Bayne SC, Thompson JY, Swift EJ, Stamatiades P, Wilkerson M. A characterization of first-generation flowable composites. JADA. 1998. 129:567–577.

14. Mount GJ. Buonocore memorial lecture. Glass-ionomer cements Past, present, and future. Oper Dent. 1994. 19:82–90.

15. McLean JW, Powis DR, Prosser HA. The use of glass-ionomer cements in bonding composite resins to dentin. Br Dent J. 1985. 158:410–414.

16. Welbury RR, Murray JJ. A clinical trial of the glass-ionomer cement-composite resin "sandwich" technique in Class II cavities in permanent premolar and molar teeth. Quintessence Int. 1990. 21:507–512.

17. Uno S, Finger WA, Ftitz U. Long-term mechanical characteristics of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials. Dent Mater. 1996. 2:64–69.

18. Lösche AC, Losche GM, Roulet JF. The effect of prolonged water storage on marginal adaptation of Class II fillings. J Dent Res. 1996. 75:394. Abstr 2232.

19. Dietrich T, Lösch AC, Losch GM, Roulet JF. Marginal adaptation of direct composite and sandwich restorations in Class II cavities with cervical margins in dentin. J Dent. 1999. 27:119–128.

20. Davidson CL, de Gee AJ, Feilzer A. The competition between the composite-dentin bond strength and the polymerization contraction stress. J Dent Res. 1984. 63:1396–1399.

21. Davidson CL, de Gee AJ. Relaxation of polymerization contraction stresses by flow in dental composites. J Dent Res. 1984. 63(12):146–148.

22. Hagge MS, Lindemuth JS, Mason JF, Simon JF. Effect of four intermediate layer treatments on microleakage of Class II composite restorations. Gen Dent. 2001. 49:489–495.

23. Beznos C. Microleakage at the cervical margin of composite Class II cavities with different restorative techniques. Oper Dent. 2001. 26:60–69.

24. Miller M, Castellanos IR, Vargas MA, Denehy GE. Effect of restorative materials on microleakage of Class II composites. J Esthet Dent. 1996. 8:107–113.

25. Abdalla AL, Davidson CL. Comparison of the marginal integrity of in vivo, in vitro Class II composite restorations. J Dent. 1993. 21:158–162.

26. Ciamponi AL, Del Portillo Lujian VADP, Ferreira Santos JF. Effectiveness of reflective wedges on the polymerization of composite resins. Quintessence Int. 1994. 25:599–602.

27. Kays BT, Sneed WD, Nuckles DB. Microhardness of Class II composite resin restorations with different matrices and light positions. J Prosthet Dent. 1991. 65:487–490.

28. Estafan D, Estafan A, Leinfelder KF. Cavity wall adaptation of resin-based composites lined with flowable composites. Am J Dent. 2000. 13:192–194.

29. Russel RR, Mazer RB. Should flowble composites be used as liners for Class II restorations? J Dent Res. 1999. 78:389. Abstr 2266.

30. Shortall A, Asmussen E. Influence of dentin-bonding agents and a glass ionomer base on the cervical marginal seal of class II composite restorations. Scand J Dent Res. 1988. 96:590–594.

31. Tjan AHL, Dunn JR. Microleakage at gingival dentin margins of class V composite restorations lined with light cured glass ionomer cements. JADA. 1990. 121:706–710.

32. Friedl KH, Schmalz G, Hiller KA, Mortazavi F. Marginal adaptation of composite restorations versus hybrid ionomer/composite sandwich restorations. Oper Dent. 1997. 22:21–29.

33. Sidhu S, Henderson L. In vitro marginal leakage of cervical composite restorations lined with a light cured glass ionomer. Oper Dent. 1992. 17:7–12.

34. Andersson-Wenckert IE, van Dijken JW, Horstedt P. Modified Class II open sandwich restorations: evaluation of interfacial adaptation influence of different restorative techniques. Eur J Oral Sci. 2002. 110:270–275.

35. Dietrich T, Kraemer M, Losche GM, Wernecke KD, Roulet JF. Influence of dentin conditioning and contamination on the marginal integrity of sandwich Class II restorations. Oper Dent. 2000. 25:401–410.

36. Dietschi D, Bindi G, Krejci I, Davidson C. Marginal and internal adaptation of stratified compomer-composite Class II restorations. Oper Dent. 2002. 27:500–509.