Investig Magn Reson Imaging.  2015 Sep;19(3):191-195. 10.13104/imri.2015.19.3.191.

Chest Wall Lipogranuloma after Hydrogel Implant Rupture: Case Report

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. bkhan@skku.edu
  • 2Department of Pathology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 3Department of Plastic Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

We present a 53-year-old woman with a large chest wall mass in the interpectoral space, which was eventually confirmed as a lipogranuloma resulting from hydrogel implant rupture. Ultrasonography (US) showed reduced implant volume with surrounding peri-implant fluid collection, suggesting the possibility of implant rupture. A heterogeneously hypoechoic mass was found between the pectoralis major and minor muscles adjacent to the ruptured implant. On magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), there was a large mass in the left interpectoral space of the upper inner chest wall. The mass showed slightly high signal intensity (SI) on pre-contrast T1-weighted image (WI) with mixed iso and high SI on T2-WI. The signal of the mass was suppressed using the water suppression technique but not with the fat suppression technique on T2-WI. The mass showed diffuse enhancement upon contrast enhancement. The enhancing kinetics showed persistent enhancement pattern. US-guided core needle biopsy revealed a lipogranuloma and removal confirmed a ruptured PIP hydrogel implant.

Keyword

Lipogranuloma; Chest wall; Hydrogel implant; Breast

MeSH Terms

Biopsy, Large-Core Needle
Breast
Female
Humans
Hydrogel*
Kinetics
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Middle Aged
Muscles
Rupture*
Thoracic Wall*
Thorax*
Ultrasonography
Water
Hydrogel
Water

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Transverse ultrasonography of left upper chest wall (a) and breast area (b). (a) Ultrasonography shows a 5-cm-sized, ill-defined heterogeneously echogenic mass (arrows) between pectoralis major (PM) and minor (Pm) muscle, superior to the implant. (b) The implant shows a reduced volume with peri-implant fluid collection (dotted arrows).

  • Fig. 2 Axial MRI of the breast. On MRI at the mass level, an 8 × 8 × 2 cm mass in the left interpectoral space of upper inner chest wall (arrows) shows slightly high signal intensity (SI) compared to the muscle in pre-contrast T1-weighted image (WI) and it shows a mixture of iso and high SI on T2-WI. The signal of the mass is suppressed by water suppressed T2-WI but not by fat suppressed T2-WI. The mass shows diffuse enhancement by contrast enhanced (CE) T1-WI.

  • Fig. 3 On MRI at the implant level, the left subpectoral implant is collapsed with a linguine sign, representing a rupture (arrows). The SI of the implant is low on T1-WI and high in T2-WI and is suppressed by water suppressed T2-WI but not by fat suppressed T2-WI, which is compatible with hydrogel implants and not with silicone implants.

  • Fig. 4 (Upper) The core biopsy specimen consists almost entirely of homogenous lipid-containing macrophages without extracellular fat vacuoles (Hematoxylin & Eosin, × 400). (Lower) Intracellular fat components show positive Sudan black B staining (arrows) (Sudan black B, × 400).


Reference

1. Lee CJ, Park JH, Park IS, Lee SI. A case report of prefilled polysaccharide hydrogel breast implant rupture: clinical, MRI, and pathologic findings. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2004; 28:401–404.
2. Choi JJ, Lee JH, Kang BJ, et al. Clinical and imaging characteristics of Polyimplant Prosthesis hydrogel breast implants. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2010; 34:449–455.
3. Adams TS, Crook T, Cadier MA. A late complication following the insertion of hydrogel breast implants. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2007; 60:210–212.
4. O'Neill JK, Rigby H, Kenealy JM. Leakage and osmotic shifts in PIP Hydrogel implants. A case demonstrating increase and decrease of implant volume in the same patient. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2008; 61:1122–1123.
5. Lee HH, Park SH, Choi HY, Park HK. Lipogranuloma with osseous metaplasia in the breast that developed after "Bu-Hwang" oriental medicine treatment. Yonsei Med J. 2011; 52:373–376.
6. Yang BT, Liu YJ, Wang YZ, Wang XY, Wang ZC. CT and MR imaging findings of periorbital lipogranuloma developing after endoscopic sinus surgery. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012; 33:2140–2143.
7. Motoori K, Takano H, Ueda T, Ishihara M. Sclerosing lipogranuloma of male genitalia: CT and MR images. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2002; 26:138–140.
8. Hyakusoku H, Ogawa R, Ono S, Ishii N, Hirakawa K. Complications after autologous fat injection to the breast. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009; 123:360–370.
9. Veber M, Tourasse C, Toussoun G, Moutran M, Mojallal A, Delay E. Radiographic findings after breast augmentation by autologous fat transfer. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011; 127:1289–1299.
10. Kim H, Yang EJ, Bang SI. Bilateral liponecrotic pseudocysts after breast augmentation by fat injection: a case report. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2012; 36:359–362.
Full Text Links
  • IMRI
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr