1. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel. J Dent Res. 1955. 434:849–853.
2. Erickson RL. Mechanisms and clinical implications of bond formation for two dentin bonding systems. Am J Dent. 1989. 10:117–123.
3. Davidson CL, de Gee AJ, Feilzer A. The competition of polymerization contraction stress by flow in dental composite. J Dent Res. 1984. 63:1396.
Article
4. Summit JB, Robbins JW, Hilton TJ, Schwartz RS, Dos Santos E Jr. Fundamentals of Operative Dentistry. 1996. 157.
5. Triolo PT Jr, Swift EJ Jr, Barkmeier WW. Shear bond strengths of composite to dentin using six dental adhesive systems. Oper Dent. 1995. 03-04. 20(2):46–50.
6. Leinfelder KF. Current status of dentin adhesive systems. Alpha Omegan. 1998. 91(4):17–22.
7. Swift EJ Jr. Bonding systems for restorative materials-a comprehensive review. Pediatr Dent. 1998. 03-04. 20(2):80–84.
8. Labella R, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B, Vanherle G. Polymerization shrinkage and elasticity of flowable composites and filled adhesives. Dent Mater. 1999. 03. 15(2):128–137.
Article
9. Fanning DE, Wakefield CW, Robbins JW, Bagley AL. Effect of a filled adhesive on bond strength in three dentinal bonding systems. Gen Dent. 1995. 43(3):256–262.
10. Miyazaki M, Ando S, Hinoura K, Onose H, Moore BK. Influence of filler addition to bonding agents on shear bond strength to bovine dentin. Dent Mater. 1995. 07. 11(4):234–238.
Article
11. Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL. Complete marginal seal of Class V resin composite restorations effected by increased flexibility. J Dent Res. 1990. 6. 69(6):1240–1243.
Article
12. Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL. Complete marginal seal of Class V resin composite restorations effected by increased flexibility. J Dent Res. 1990. 06. 69(6):1240–1243.
Article
13. Van Meerbeek B, Willems G, Celis JP, Roos JR, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Assessment by nanoindentation of the hardness and elasticity of the resindentin bonding area. J Dent Res. 1993. 10. 72(10):1434–1442.
Article
14. Pashly DH. Dentin bonding: overview of the substrate with respect to adhesive material. J Esthet Dent. 1991. 03-04. 3(2):46–50.
Article
15. Hara AT, Pimenta LA, Rodrigues AL Jr. Influence of cross head speed on resin dentin shear bond strength. Dent Mater. 2001. 07. 17(2):165–169.
16. Rueggeberg FA, Margeson DH. The effect of on an oxygen inhibition of unfilled/filled composite system. J Dent Res. 1990. 10. 69(10):1652–1658.
Article
17. Finger WJ, Lee KS, Podszun W. Monomers with low oxygen inhibition as enamel/dentin adhesives. Dent Mater. 1996. 07. 12(4):256–261.
Article
18. Fanning DE, Wakefield CW, Robbins JW, Bagley AL. Robbins Effects of a filled adhesives on bond strength in three dentinal bonding systems. Gen Dent. 1995. 05-06. 43(3):256–262.
19. Bagley A, Wakefield CW, Robbins JW. In vitro comparison of filled and unfilled universal bonding agents of amalgam to dentin. Oper Dent. 1994. 05-06. 19(3):97–101.
20. St Germain H, Swartz ML, Phillips RW, Moore BK, Roberts TA. Properties of microfilled composite resins as influenced by filler content. J Dent Res. 1985. 02. 64(2):155–160.
Article
21. Xie D, Brantley WA, Culbertson BM, Wang G. Mechanical properties and microstructures of glassionomer cements. Dent Mater. 2000. 03. 16(2):129–138.
Article
22. Lin CT, Lee SY, Keh ES, Dong DR, Huang HM, Shih YH. Influence of silanization and filler fraction on aged dental composites. J Oral Rehabil. 2000. 11. 27(11):919–926.
Article