J Gynecol Oncol.  2011 Mar;22(1):1-2. 10.3802/jgo.2011.22.1.1.

Cervical adenocarcinoma in situ with negative conization margin: negligible or not?

• Kang S

• KMID: 2173578
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2011.22.1.1

Abstract

No abstract available.

MeSH Terms

Adenocarcinoma
Conization

Reference

1. Kim ML, Hahn HS, Lim KT, Lee KH, Kim HS, Hong SR, et al. The safety of conization in the management of adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix. J Gynecol Oncol. 2011. 22:25–31.

2. Salani R, Puri I, Bristow RE. Adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix: a metaanalysis of 1278 patients evaluating the predictive value of conization margin status. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009. 200:182.e1–182.e5.

3. Bjerre B, Eliasson G, Linell F, Soderberg H, Sjoberg NO. Conization as only treatment of carcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1976. 125:143–152.

4. Kolstad P, Klem V. Long-term followup of 1121 cases of carcinoma in situ. Obstet Gynecol. 1976. 48:125–129.