J Gynecol Oncol.  2008 Sep;19(3):206-206. 10.3802/jgo.2008.19.3.206.

In reply

• Lee YK
• Han SS
• Kim JW
• Park NH
• Song YS
• Kang SB

• KMID: 2173406
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2008.19.3.206

Abstract

No abstract available.

Reference

1. Hricak H, Gatsonis C, Chi DS, Amendola MA, Brandt K, Schwartz LH, et al. Role of imaging in pretreatment evaluation of early invasive cervical cancer: results of the intergroup study American College of Radiology Imaging Network 6651-Gynecologic Oncology Group 183. J Clin Oncol. 2005. 23:9329–9337.

2. Kim SH, Choi BI, Han JK, Kim HD, Lee HP, Kang SB, et al. Preoperative staging of uterine cervical carcinoma: comparison of CT and MRI in 99 patients. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1993. 17:633–640.

3. Sironi S, De Cobelli F, Scarfone G, Colombo E, Bolis G, Ferrari A, et al. Carcinoma of the cervix: value of plain and gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging in assessing degree of invasiveness. Radiology. 1993. 188:797–801.

4. Togashi K, Nishimura K, Sagoh T, Minami S, Noma S, Fujisawa I, et al. Carcinoma of the cervix: staging with MR imaging. Radiology. 1989. 171:245–251.

5. Hricak H, Gatsonis C, Coakley FV, Snyder B, Reinhold C, Schwartz LH, et al. Early invasive cervical cancer: CT and MR imaging in preoperative evaluation - ACRIN/GOG comparative study of diagnostic performance and interobserver variability. Radiology. 2007. 245:491–498.

6. Mitchell DG, Snyder B, Coakley F, Reinhold C, Thomas G, Amendola M, et al. Early invasive cervical cancer: tumor delineation by magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and clinical examination, verified by pathologic results, in the ACRIN 6651/GOG 183 Intergroup Study. J Clin Oncol. 2006. 24:5687–5694.