Hanyang Med Rev.  2013 Aug;33(3):178-184. 10.7599/hmr.2013.33.3.178.

Adverse Effects of Ureteral Stent and Development of the Antireflux Ureteral Stent

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Urology, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Guri, Korea. moonuro@hanyang.ac.kr
  • 2Department of Medical System Engineering, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST), Gwangju, Korea.

Abstract

The double J ureteral stent (D-J stent) represents the ureteral catheter widely used nowadays. The main purpose of the D-J stent is to resolve ureteral obstruction caused by intraureteral or extra-ureteral etiologies. Indications of D-J stents have been extended and it has become one of the most important surgical instruments that protect the kidney and ureter. The ideal D-J stent should be easy to insert and remove and should not cause any adverse effects in vivo. In addition, it has to function well. However, there has been no immaculate D-J stent because our body conceives the ureteral stent as a foreign object and numerous developments are being made in order to overcome it. Vesicoureteral reflux, one of the adverse effects of the D-J stent, is the most troublesome adverse effect because it may scar the renal parenchyma, leading to permanent deterioration of renal function. This review is to discuss adverse effects of ureteral stents and to present the novel antireflux D-J stent that may reduce vesicoureteral reflux.

Keyword

Ureter; Stents; Prosthesis Design; Postoperative Complications; Vesico-Ureteral Reflux

MeSH Terms

Cicatrix
Kidney
Postoperative Complications
Prosthesis Design
Stents
Surgical Instruments
Ureter
Ureteral Obstruction
Urinary Catheters
Vesico-Ureteral Reflux

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Normal position and shape of D-J ureteral catheter in the right ureter.

  • Fig. 2 Biomaterials of ureteral stents. (A) Polyurethane, (B) Metal.

  • Fig. 3 Malposition of D-J ureteral catheter in the left ureter. (A) The proximal tip of D-J ureteral catheter looks like "fish reeling" which means the typical shape of malposition. (B) The proximal tip of D-J ureteral catheter is in the upper ureter lumen.

  • Fig. 4 Migration of distal tip of the D-J ureteral catheter to the bladder neck.

  • Fig. 5 Schematic design of antireflux valve with 4 flaps: (A) P1P2 (Close). *P (Pressure).

  • Fig. 6 Photo images of the antireflux stent. (A) Antireflux valve, (B) D-J stent bonded with an antireflux valve, (C) D-J stent connected to guide wire.


Cited by  1 articles

Role of Experimental Research as a Surgeon
Hwon Kyum Park
Hanyang Med Rev. 2013;33(3):139-141.    doi: 10.7599/hmr.2013.33.3.139.


Reference

1. Zimskind PD, Fetter TR, Wilkerson JL. Clinical use of long-term indwelling silicone rubber ureteral splints inserted cystoscopically. J Urol. 1967; 97:840–844.
Article
2. Finney RP. Experience with new double J ureteral catheter stent. J Urol. 1978; 120:678–681.
Article
3. Lumiaho J, Heino A, Aaltomaa S, Valimaa T, Talja M. A short biodegradable helical spiral ureteric stent provides better antireflux and drainage properties than a double-J stent. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2011; 45:129–133.
Article
4. Dyer RB, Chen MY, Zagoria RJ, Regan JD, Hood CG, Kavanagh PV. Complications of ureteral stent placement. Radiographics. 2002; 22:1005–1022.
Article
5. Damiano R, Oliva A, Esposito C, De Sio M, Autorino R, D'Armiento M. Early and late complications of double pigtail ureteral stent. Urol Int. 2002; 69:136–140.
Article
6. Joshi HB, Okeke A, Newns N, Keeley FX Jr, Timoney AG. Characterization of urinary symptoms in patients with ureteral stents. Urology. 2002; 59:511–516.
Article
7. Moon KT, Cho HJ, Cho JM, Kang JY, Yoo TK, Moon HS, et al. Comparison of an Indwelling Period Following Ureteroscopic Removal of Stones between Double-J Stents and Open-Ended Catheters: A Prospective, Pilot, Randomized, Multicenter Study. Korean J Urol. 2011; 52:698–702.
Article
8. Cummings LJ, Waters SL, Wattis JA, Graham SJ. The effect of ureteric stents on urine flow: reflux. J Math Biol. 2004; 49:56–82.
Article
9. Al-Aown A, Kyriazis I, Kallidonis P, Kraniotis P, Rigopoulos C, Karnabatidis D, et al. Ureteral stents: new ideas, new designs. Ther Adv Urol. 2010; 2:85–92.
Article
10. Venkatesan N, Shroff S, Jayachandran K, Doble M. Polymers as ureteral stents. J Endourol. 2010; 24:191–198.
Article
11. Pedro RN, Hendlin K, Kriedberg C, Monga M. Wire-based ureteral stents: impact on tensile strength and compression. Urology. 2007; 70:1057–1059.
Article
12. Liatsikos E, Kallidonis P, Stolzenburg JU, Karnabatidis D. Ureteral stents: past, present and future. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2009; 6:313–324.
Article
13. Pollard SG, Macfarlane R. Symptoms arising from Double-J ureteral stents. J Urol. 1988; 139:37–38.
Article
14. Lennon GM, Thornhill JA, Sweeney PA, Grainger R, McDermott TE, Butler MR. 'Firm' versus 'soft' double pigtail ureteric stents: a randomised blind comparative trial. Eur Urol. 1995; 28:1–5.
Article
15. Chua ME, Morales ML Jr. Spontaneous fracture of indwelling polyurethane ureteral stents: A case series and review of literature. Can Urol Assoc J. 2012; 6:386–392.
Article
16. Slaton JW, Kropp KA. Proximal ureteral stent migration: an avoidable complication? J Urol. 1996; 155:58–61.
Article
17. Singh I, Gupta NP, Hemal AK, Aron M, Seth A, Dogra PN. Severely encrusted polyurethane ureteral stents: management and analysis of potential risk factors. Urology. 2001; 58:526–531.
Article
18. Robert M, Boularan AM, El Sandid M, Grasset D. Double-J ureteric stent encrustations: clinical study on crystal formation on polyurethane stents. Urol Int. 1997; 58:100–104.
Article
19. Somers WJ. Management of forgotten or retained indwelling ureteral stents. Urology. 1996; 47:431–435.
Article
20. Arshad M, Shah SS, Abbasi MH. Applications and complications of polyurethane stenting in urology. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2006; 18:69–72.
21. Kumar M, Aron M, Agarwal AK, Gupta NP. Stenturia: An unusual manifestation of spontaneous ureteral stent fragmentation. Urol Int. 1999; 62:114–116.
Article
22. Bergqvist D, Parsson H, Sherif A. Arterio-ureteral fistula--a systematic review. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2001; 22:191–196.
23. el-Faqih SR, Shamsuddin AB, Chakrabarti A, Atassi R, Kardar AH, Osman MK, et al. Polyurethane internal ureteral stents in treatment of stone patients: morbidity related to indwelling times. J Urol. 1991; 146:1487–1491.
Article
24. Griffiths DJ. Dynamics of the upper urinary tract: I. Peristaltic flow through a distensible tube of limited length. Phys Med Biol. 1987; 32:813–822.
Article
25. Griffiths DJ, Constantinou CE, Mortensen J, Djurhuus JC. Dynamics of the upper urinary tract: II. The effect of variations of peristaltic frequency and bladder pressure on pyeloureteral pressure/flow relations. Phys Med Biol. 1987; 32:823–833.
Article
26. Mosli HA, Farsi HM, al-Zimaity MF, Saleh TR, al-Zamzami MM. Vesicoureteral reflux in patients with double pigtail stents. J Urol. 1991; 146:966–969.
Article
27. Irani J, Siquier J, Pires C, Lefebvre O, Dore B, Aubert J. Symptom characteristics and the development of tolerance with time in patients with indwelling double-pigtail ureteric stents. BJU Int. 1999; 84:276–279.
Article
28. Maheshwari PN, Andankar MG, Khera R, Stone RG. The indwelling ureteric stent: a 'friendly' procedure with unfriendly high morbidity. BJU Int. 2000; 86:757–758.
Article
29. Richter S, Ringel A, Shalev M, Nissenkorn I. The indwelling ureteric stent: a 'friendly' procedure with unfriendly high morbidity. BJU Int. 2000; 85:408–411.
Article
30. Tschada R, Mickisch G, Rassweiler J, Knebel L, Alken P. [Success and failure with double J ureteral stent. Analysis of 107 cases]. J Urol (Paris). 1991; 97:93–97.
31. Hubner WA, Plas EG, Trigo-Rocha F, Tanagho EA. Drainage and reflux characteristics of antireflux ureteral double-J stents. J Endourol. 1993; 7:497–499.
Article
32. Ecke TH, Bartel P, Hallmann S, Ruttloff J. Evaluation of symptoms and patients' comfort for JJ-ureteral stents with and without antireflux-membrane valve. Urology. 2010; 75:212–216.
Article
33. Lasaponara F, Catti M, Morabito F, Volpe A, Manassero F, Ferrando U. Use of small calibre JJ ureteral stent with anti-reflux valve in uretero-vesical anastomosis during renal transplantation. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2000; 52:195–199.
Full Text Links
  • HMR
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr