Cancer Res Treat.  2011 Jun;43(2):89-95.

Implications of Bone-Only Metastases in Breast Cancer: Favorable Preference with Excellent Outcomes of Hormone Receptor Positive Breast Cancer

Affiliations
  • 1Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. imyh00@skku.edu
  • 2Department of Pathology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 3Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE
The aim of the current study was to determine the incidence, clinical presentation, and treatment outcomes of "bone-only metastases" in patients with breast cancer and to analyze the impact of hormone receptor (HR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status on prognosis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Between 1994 and 2007, of 968 patients with metastatic breast cancer who underwent palliative management at Samsung Medical Center, 565 (57%) relapsed with distant metastases. Of the 968, 146 (15%) had bone-only metastases during a median follow-up period of 75 months. Among the 146 patients with bone-only metastases, 122 (84%) were relapsed patients after curative surgery and 24 (26%) were initially metastatic cases.
RESULTS
The median time from primary surgery to bone-only metastases of the 122 patients was 37 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 27 to 46 months). Bone-only metastases were more common in the HR-positive group than in the other subtypes (85% for HR+; 8.2% for HER2+; 6.8% for triple negative. Among all 146 patients, 75 (51%) were treated with hormone therapy. The median post-relapse progression-free survival was 15 months (95%CI, 13 to 17 months). The median overall survival was much longer in the HR+ patients than the HER2+ and triple negative breast cancer patients with marginal statistical significance (65 vs. 40 vs. 40 months, p=0.077).
CONCLUSION
Breast cancer patients with "bone-only metastases" had excellent clinical outcomes. Further study is now warranted to reveal the underlying biology that regulates the behavior of this indolent tumor, as it should identify 'favorable tumor characteristics' in addition to 'favorable preferential metastatic site.'

Keyword

Bone; Neoplasm metastasis; Breast neoplasms; Estrogen receptors; Progesterone receptors; HER2

MeSH Terms

Biology
Breast
Breast Neoplasms
Disease-Free Survival
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Incidence
Neoplasm Metastasis
Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor
Receptor, erbB-2
Receptors, Estrogen
Receptors, Progesterone
Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor
Receptor, erbB-2
Receptors, Estrogen
Receptors, Progesterone

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Patient cohort. MBC pts, patients with metastatic breast cancer.

  • Fig. 2 Overall survival (OS) from metastasis according to breast cancer subtypes. Blue line represents OS of hormone receptor (HR)-(+) patients; green line represents OS of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-(+) patients; red line represents OS of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients.

  • Fig. 3 Progression free survival (PFS) (A) and overall survival (OS) (B) between the patients with single and multiple bone involvement; green line represents survival of patients with single bone metastasis; blue line represents survival of patients with multiple bone metastases.


Reference

1. Coleman RE. Skeletal complications of malignancy. Cancer. 1997; 80(8 Suppl):1588–1594. PMID: 9362426.
Article
2. Coleman RE, Rubens RD. The clinical course of bone metastases from breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 1987; 55:61–66. PMID: 3814476.
Article
3. Parkin DM, Pisani P, Ferlay J. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 1999; 49:33–64. 1PMID: 10200776.
Article
4. Sherry MM, Greco FA, Johnson DH, Hainsworth JD. Breast cancer with skeletal metastases at initial diagnosis. Distinctive clinical characteristics and favorable prognosis. Cancer. 1986; 58:178–182. PMID: 2423224.
Article
5. Sherry MM, Greco FA, Johnson DH, Hainsworth JD. Metastatic breast cancer confined to the skeletal system: an indolent disease. Am J Med. 1986; 81:381–386. PMID: 2428242.
6. Lee YT. Patterns of metastasis and natural courses of breast carcinoma. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 1985; 4:153–172. PMID: 3893684.
7. Kamby C, Ejlertsen B, Andersen J, Birkler NE, Rytter L, Zedeler K, et al. The pattern of metastases in human breast cancer: influence of systemic adjuvant therapy and impact on survival. Acta Oncol. 1988; 27:715–719. PMID: 3219223.
Article
8. Coleman RE, Smith P, Rubens RD. Clinical course and prognostic factors following bone recurrence from breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 1998; 77:336–340. PMID: 9461007.
Article
9. Carlson RW, Allred DC, Anderson BO, Burstein HJ, Carter WB, Edge SB, et al. Breast cancer: clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2009; 7:122–192. PMID: 19200416.
Article
10. Nguyen DX, Massagué J. Genetic determinants of cancer metastasis. Nat Rev Genet. 2007; 8:341–352. PMID: 17440531.
Article
11. Smid M, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Sieuwerts AM, Yu J, Klijn JG, et al. Subtypes of breast cancer show preferential site of relapse. Cancer Res. 2008; 68:3108–3114. PMID: 18451135.
Article
12. Chiang AC, Massagué J. Molecular basis of metastasis. N Engl J Med. 2008; 359:2814–2823. PMID: 19109576.
Article
13. Lacroix M. Significance, detection and markers of disseminated breast cancer cells. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2006; 13:1033–1067. PMID: 17158753.
Article
14. Paget S. The distribution of secondary growths in cancer of the breast. Lancet. 1889; 133:571–573.
Article
15. Karrison TG, Ferguson DJ, Meier P. Dormancy of mammary carcinoma after mastectomy. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999; 91:80–85. PMID: 9890174.
Article
16. Pfitzenmaier J, Ellis WJ, Arfman EW, Hawley S, McLaughlin PO, Lange PH, et al. Telomerase activity in disseminated prostate cancer cells. BJU Int. 2006; 97:1309–1313. PMID: 16686730.
Article
17. Weckermann D, Müller P, Wawroschek F, Harzmann R, Riethmüller G, Schlimok G. Disseminated cytokeratin positive tumor cells in the bone marrow of patients with prostate cancer: detection and prognostic value. J Urol. 2001; 166:699–703. PMID: 11458120.
Article
18. Demicheli R. Tumour dormancy: findings and hypotheses from clinical research on breast cancer. Semin Cancer Biol. 2001; 11:297–306. PMID: 11513565.
Article
19. Zhang XH, Wang Q, Gerald W, Hudis CA, Norton L, Smid M, et al. Latent bone metastasis in breast cancer tied to Src-dependent survival signals. Cancer Cell. 2009; 16:67–78. PMID: 19573813.
Article
20. Schmidt-Kittler O, Ragg T, Daskalakis A, Granzow M, Ahr A, Blankenstein TJ, et al. From latent disseminated cells to overt metastasis: genetic analysis of systemic breast cancer progression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003; 100:7737–7742. PMID: 12808139.
Article
21. Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG). Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet. 2005; 365:1687–1717. PMID: 15894097.
22. Hess KR, Pusztai L, Buzdar AU, Hortobagyi GN. Estrogen receptors and distinct patterns of breast cancer relapse. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2003; 78:105–118. PMID: 12611463.
Article
23. Bromann PA, Korkaya H, Courtneidge SA. The interplay between Src family kinases and receptor tyrosine kinases. Oncogene. 2004; 23:7957–7968. PMID: 15489913.
Article
Full Text Links
  • CRT
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr