1. Rex DK, Schoenfeld PS, Cohen J, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015; 110:72–90.
Article
2. Ward ST, Mohammed MA, Walt R, Valori R, Ismail T, Dunckley P. An analysis of the learning curve to achieve competency at colonoscopy using the JETS database. Gut. 2014; 63:1746–1754.
Article
3. Lee SH, Chung IK, Kim SJ, et al. An adequate level of training for technical competence in screening and diagnostic colonoscopy: a prospective multicenter evaluation of the learning curve. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 67:683–689.
Article
4. Williams JE, Le TD, Faigel DO. Polypectomy rate as a quality measure for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011; 73:498–506.
Article
5. Francis DL, Rodriguez-Correa DT, Buchner A, Harewood GC, Wallace M. Application of a conversion factor to estimate the adenoma detection rate from the polyp detection rate. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011; 73:493–497.
Article
6. Williams JE, Holub JL, Faigel DO. Polypectomy rate is a valid quality measure for colonoscopy: results from a national endoscopy database. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012; 75:576–582.
Article
7. Gohel TD, Burke CA, Lankaala P, et al. Polypectomy rate: a surrogate for adenoma detection rate varies by colon segment, gender, and endoscopist. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014; 12:1137–1142.
Article
8. Jung DK, Kim TO, Kang MS, Kim MS, Kim MS, Moon YS. The colonoscopist’s expertise affects the characteristics of detected polyps. Clin Endosc. 2016; 49:61–68.
Article
9. Spier BJ, Benson M, Pfau PR, Nelligan G, Lucey MR, Gaumnitz EA. Colonoscopy training in gastroenterology fellowships: determining competence. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010; 71:319–324.
Article
10. Gromski MA, Miller CA, Lee SH, et al. Trainees’ adenoma detection rate is higher if ≥ 10 minutes is spent on withdrawal during colonoscopy. Surg Endosc. 2012; 26:1337–1342.