Cancer Res Treat.  2004 Dec;36(6):372-376.

Open-label, Randomized Comparison of the Efficacy of Intravenous Dolasetron Mesylate and Ondansetron in the Prevention of Acute and Delayed Cisplatin-induced Emesis in Cancer Patients

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. kimty@snu.ac.kr

Abstract

PURPOSE
The aim of this study is to compare the antiemetic efficacy and tolerability of intravenous dolasetron mesylate and ondansetron in the prevention of acute and delayed emesis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From April 2002 through October 2002, a total of 112 patients receiving cisplatin- based combination chemotherapy were randomized to receive a single i.v. dose of dolasetron 100 mg or ondansetron 8 mg, 30 minutes before the initiation of chemotherapy. In the ondansetron group, two additional doses of ondansetron 8 mg were given at intervals of 2 to 4 hours. To prevent delayed emesis, dolasetron 200 mg p.o. daily or ondansetron 8 mg p.o. bid was administered from the 2nd days to a maximum of 5 days. The primary end point was the proportion of patients that experienced no emetic episodes and required no rescue medication (complete response, CR) during the 24 hours (acute period) and during Day 2 to Day 5 2 days (delayed period), after chemotherapy. The secondary end points included the incidence and severity of emesis. RESULTS: 105 patients were evaluable for efficacy. CR rates during the acute period were 36.0% for a single dose of dolasetron 100 mg, and 43.6% for three doses of ondansetron 8 mg. CR rates during the delayed period were 8.0% and 10.9%, respectively. There was no significant difference in the efficacy between the two groups. Adverse effects were mostly mild to moderate and not related to study medication. CONCLUSIONS: A single i.v. dose of dolasetron 100 mg is as effective as three i.v. doses of ondansetron 8 mg in preventing acute and delayed emesis after cisplatin- based chemotherapy, with a comparable safety profile.

Keyword

Dolasetron mesylate; 5-HT3 receptor antagonist; Antiemetics; Nausea; Vomiting; Ondansetron

MeSH Terms

Antiemetics
Drug Therapy
Drug Therapy, Combination
Humans
Incidence
Mesylates*
Nausea
Ondansetron*
Vomiting*
Antiemetics
Mesylates
Ondansetron

Reference

1. Hesketh PJ. Comparative review of 5-HT3 receptor antagonists in the treatment of acute chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Cancer Invest. 2000; 18:163–173. PMID: 10705879.
2. Coates A, Abraham S, Kaye SB, Sowerbutts T, Frewin C, Fox RM, et al. On the receiving end--patient perception of the side-effects of cancer chemotherapy. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol. 1983; 19:203–208. PMID: 6681766.
Article
3. Cooper S, Georgiou V. The impact of cytotoxic chemotherapy--perspectives from patients, specialists and nurses. Eur J Cancer. 1992; 28A(Suppl 1):S36–S38. PMID: 1627406.
4. Doherty KM. Closing the gap in prophylactic antiemetic therapy: patient factors in calculating the emetogenic potential of chemotherapy. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 1999; 3:113–119. PMID: 10690042.
5. A double-blind randomized study comparing intramuscular (i.m.) granisetron with i.m. granisetron plus dexamethasone in the prevention of delayed emesis induced by cisplatin. The Italian Multicenter Study Group. Anticancer Drugs. 1999; 10:465–470. PMID: 10477166.
6. Ritter HL Jr, Gralla RJ, Hall SW, Wada JK, Friedman C, Hand L, et al. Efficacy of intravenous granisetron to control nausea and vomiting during multiple cycles of cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Cancer Invest. 1998; 16:87–93. PMID: 9512674.
Article
7. Gittos M, Fatmi M. Potent 5-HT3 antagonists incorporating a novel bridged pseudopelletierine ring system. Actual Chim Ther. 1989; 16:187–189.
8. Boxenbaum H, Gillespie T, Heck K, Hahne W. Human dolasetron pharmacokinetics: I. Disposition following single- dose intravenous administration to normal male subjects. Biopharm Drug Dispos. 1992; 13:693–701. PMID: 1467456.
9. Boeijinga PH, Galvan M, Baron BM, Dudley MW, Siegel BW, Slone AL. Characterization of the novel 5-HT3 antagonists MDL 73147EF (dolasetron mesilate) and MDL 74156 in NG108-15 neuroblastoma x glioma cells. Eur J Pharmacol. 1992; 219:9–13. PMID: 1397053.
10. Galvan M, Gittos M, Miller R. Dolasetron mesilate (MDL 73147EF), a potent anti-emetic 4-HT3 receptor antagonist. Br J Pharmacol. 1992; 107(suppl):449.
11. Miller R, Galvan M, Gittos M. Pharmacological properties of dolasetron, a potent and selective antagonist at 5-HT3 receptors. Drug Dev Res. 1993; 28:87–93.
12. Shah A, Lanman R, Bhargava V, Weir S, Hahne W. Pharmacokinetics of dolasetron following single- and multiple-dose intravenous administration to normal male subjects. Biopharm Drug Dispos. 1995; 16:177–189. PMID: 7787130.
Article
13. Galvan M, Gittos M, Fatmi M. Dolasetron mesylate. Drugs Future. 1993; 18:506–509.
Article
14. Conroy T, Cappelaere P, Fabbro M, Fauser AA, Splinter TA, Spielmann M, et al. Acute antiemetic efficacy and safety of dolasetron mesylate, a 5-HT3 antagonist, in cancer patients treated with cisplatin. European Dolasetron Study Group. Am J Clin Oncol. 1994; 17:97–102. PMID: 8141114.
15. Kris mg, Grunberg SM, Gralla RJ, Baltzer L, Zaretsky SA, Lifsey D, et al. Dose-ranging evaluation of the serotonin antagonist dolasetron mesylate in patients receiving high-dose cisplatin. J Clin Oncol. 1994; 12:1045–1049. PMID: 8164028.
Article
16. Plezia P, Modiano M, Alberts D. A double-blind, randomized, parallel study of two doses of intravenous MDL73, 147EF in patients (PTS) receiving high cisplatin (CDDP)-containing chemotherapy (CT). Proc Soc Clin Oncol. 1992.
17. Hesketh PJ, Gandara DR, Hesketh AM, Facada A, Perez EA, Webber LM, et al. Dose-ranging evaluation of the antiemetic efficacy of intravenous dolasetron in patients receiving chemotherapy with doxorubicin or cyclophosphamide. Support Care Cancer. 1996; 4:141–146. PMID: 8673351.
Article
18. Hesketh P, Navari R, Grote T, Gralla R, Hainsworth J, Kris M, et al. Double-blind, randomized comparison of the antiemetic efficacy of intravenous dolasetron mesylate and intravenous ondansetron in the prevention of acute cisplatin-induced emesis in patients with cancer. Dolasetron Comparative Chemotherapy-induced Emesis Prevention Group. J Clin Oncol. 1996; 14:2242–2249. PMID: 8708713.
Article
19. Im YH, Park YS, Jang JS, Lee JY, Yoon SS, Heo DS, et al. A randomized comparison of antiemetic effect of ondansetron versus MDL (Metoclopramide/Dexamethasone/Lorazepam) in patients receiving cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy. J Korean Cancer Assoc. 1992; 24:378–389.
20. Kris MG, Gralla RJ, Tyson LB, Clark RA, Cirrincione C, Groshen S. Controlling delayed vomiting: double-blind, randomized trial comparing placebo, dexamethasone alone, and metoclopramide plus dexamethasone in patients receiving cisplatin. J Clin Oncol. 1989; 7:108–114. PMID: 2642536.
Article
21. Wilder-Smith OH, Borgeat A, Chappuis P, Fathi M, Forni M. Urinary serotonin metabolite excretion during cisplatin chemotherapy. Cancer. 1993; 72:2239–2241. PMID: 7690681.
Article
22. Elizabeth G, David S. 5-HT3 receptor antagonists for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Drugs. 1998; 55:173–189. PMID: 9506240.
23. Barisano A, Mehl B, Bradbury K. Serotonin antagonists: treatment of chemotherapy-induced emesis. Mt Sinai J Med. 1992; 59:433–437. PMID: 1435844.
Full Text Links
  • CRT
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr