Ann Rehabil Med.  2013 Apr;37(2):254-262. 10.5535/arm.2013.37.2.254.

Nerve Conduction Studies of Median Motor Nerve and Median Sensory Branches According to the Severity of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Rehabilitation Center, Seoul, Korea.
  • 2Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. hkkwon@korea.ac.kr

Abstract


OBJECTIVE
To evaluate each digital branch of the median sensory nerve and motor nerves to abductor pollicis brevis (APB) and 2nd lumbrical (2L) according to the severity of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).
METHODS
A prospective study was performed in 67 hands of 41 patients with CTS consisting of mild, 23; moderate, 27; and severe cases, 17. Compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) were obtained from APB and 2L, and median sensory nerve action potentials (SNAPs) were recorded from the thumb to the 4th digit. Parameters analyzed were latency of the median CMAP, latency difference of 2L and first palmar interosseous (PI), as well as latency and baseline to peak amplitude of the median SNAPs.
RESULTS
The onset and peak latencies of the median SNAPs revealed significant differences only in the 2nd digit, according to the severity of CTS, and abnormal rates of the latencies were significantly lower in the 2nd digit to a mild degree. The amplitude of SNAP and sensory nerve conduction velocities were more preserved in the 2nd digit in mild CTS and more affected in the 4th digit in severe CTS. CMAPs were not evoked with APB recording in 4 patients with severe CTS, but obtained in all patients with 2L recording. 2L-PI showed statistical significance according to the severity of CTS.
CONCLUSION
The branch to the 4th digit was mostly involved and the branch to the 2nd digit and 2L were less affected in the progress of CTS. The second digit recorded SNAPs and 2L recorded CMAPs would be valuable in the evaluation of severe CTS.

Keyword

Carpal tunnel syndrome; Median nerve; Nerve conduction study; Digital branch of median nerve

MeSH Terms

Action Potentials
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Hand
Humans
Median Nerve
Muscles
Neural Conduction
Prospective Studies
Thumb

Cited by  2 articles

Diagnostic Value of the Second Lumbrical-Interosseous Distal Motor Latency Comparison Test in Severe Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
SangHun Lee, DongHyun Kim, Hee-Mun Cho, Ho-Sung Nam, Dong-Sik Park
Ann Rehabil Med. 2016;40(1):50-55.    doi: 10.5535/arm.2016.40.1.50.

Reference Standard of Median Nerve Conduction Study in Korea
Jae Hyun Lee, Eunkyung Kim, Hyung-Seok Shim, Min-Gu Kang, Keewon Kim, Sang Yoon Lee, Goo Joo Lee, Shi-Uk Lee, Jae-Young Lim, Sun Gun Chung, Byung-Mo Oh
Ann Rehabil Med. 2024;48(4):259-270.    doi: 10.5535/arm.240015.


Reference

1. Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Practice parameter for carpal tunnel syndrome (summary statement). Neurology. 1993; 43:2406–2409. PMID: 8232968.
2. Atroshi I, Gummesson C, Johnsson R, Ornstein E, Ranstam J, Rosen I. Prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome in a general population. JAMA. 1999; 282:153–158. PMID: 10411196.
Article
3. Jablecki CK, Andary MT, So YT, Wilkins DE, Williams FH. AAEM Quality Assurance Committee. Literature review of the usefulness of nerve conduction studies and electromyography for the evaluation of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve. 1993; 16:1392–1414. PMID: 8232399.
Article
4. Bernstein WJ. The electrodiagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve. 1999; 22:139–140. PMID: 9883871.
Article
5. Jablecki CK, Andary MT, Floeter MK, Miller RG, Quartly CA, Vennix MJ, et al. WITHDRAWN: Second AAEM literature review of the usefulness of nerve conduction studies and needle electromyography for the evaluation of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve. 2002; 6. 11. [Epub].
6. Sheean GL, Houser MK, Murray NM. Lumbrical-interosseous latency comparison in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1995; 97:285–289. PMID: 8536577.
Article
7. Aydin G, Keles I, Ozbudak Demir S, Baysal AI. Sensitivity of median sensory nerve conduction tests in digital branches for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2004; 83:17–21. PMID: 14709970.
8. Terzis S, Paschalis C, Metallinos IC, Papapetropoulos T. Early diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: comparison of sensory conduction studies of four fingers. Muscle Nerve. 1998; 21:1543–1545. PMID: 9771684.
Article
9. Werner RA, Andary M. Carpal tunnel syndrome: pathophysiology and clinical neurophysiology. Clin Neurophysiol. 2002; 113:1373–1381. PMID: 12169318.
Article
10. Boonyapisit K, Katirji B, Shapiro BE, Preston DC. Lumbrical and interossei recording in severe carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve. 2002; 25:102–105. PMID: 11754192.
Article
11. Johnson EW, Sipski M, Lammertse T. Median and radial sensory latencies to digit I: normal values and usefulness in carpal tunnel syndrome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1987; 68:140–141. PMID: 3827552.
12. Preston DC, Logigian EL. Lumbrical and interossei recording in carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve. 1992; 15:1253–1257. PMID: 1488062.
Article
13. Lee HJ, Kwon HK. Electrophysiologic classification of severity of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Korean Assoc EMG-Electrodiagn Med. 2004; 6:1–3.
14. Pyun SB, Kwon HK, Lee HJ. How to deal with the latency of unobtainable responses in the statistical analysis. J Korean Acad Rehabil Med. 1998; 22:1056–1059.
15. Macdonell RA, Schwartz MS, Swash M. Carpal tunnel syndrome: which finger should be tested? an analysis of sensory conduction in digital branches of the median nerve. Muscle Nerve. 1990; 13:601–606. PMID: 2388658.
16. Tsaiweichao-Shozawa Y, Sonoo M, Shimizu T. Patterns of nerve conduction abnormalities in severe carpal tunnel syndrome. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2008; 25:281–286. PMID: 18791471.
Article
17. Padua L, LoMonaco M, Gregori B, Valente EM, Padua R, Tonali P. Neurophysiological classification and sensitivity in 500 carpal tunnel syndrome hands. Acta Neurol Scand. 1997; 96:211–217. PMID: 9325471.
Article
18. Lauritzen M, Liguori R, Trojaborg W. Orthodromic sensory conduction along the ring finger in normal subjects and in patients with a carpal tunnel syndrome. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1991; 81:18–23. PMID: 1705215.
Article
19. Cioni R, Passero S, Paradiso C, Giannini F, Battistini N, Rushworth G. Diagnostic specificity of sensory and motor nerve conduction variables in early detection of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Neurol. 1989; 236:208–213. PMID: 2760633.
Article
20. Kuntzer T. Carpal tunnel syndrome in 100 patients: sensitivity, specificity of multi-neurophysiological procedures and estimation of axonal loss of motor, sensory and sympathetic median nerve fibers. J Neurol Sci. 1994; 127:221–229. PMID: 7707081.
Article
21. Sunderland S. The intraneural topography of the radial, median and ulnar nerves. Brain. 1945; 68:243–299. PMID: 20982793.
Article
Full Text Links
  • ARM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr