Ann Rehabil Med.  2014 Jun;38(3):376-380. 10.5535/arm.2014.38.3.376.

The Usefulness of M-B CDI-K Short Form as Screening Test in Children With Language Developmental Delay

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea. snoopyhara@hanmail.net
  • 2Speech Therapy Section, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea.

Abstract


OBJECTIVE
To investigate the usefulness of MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories-Korean (M-B CDI-K) short form as a screening test in children with language developmental delay.
METHODS
From April 2010 to May 2012, a total of 87 patients visited the department of physical medicine and rehabilitation of National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital with the complaint of language developmental delay and were enrolled in this study. All patients took M-B CDI-K short form and Sequenced Language Scale for Infants (SELSI) or Preschool Receptive-Expressive Language Scale (PRES) according to their age.
RESULTS
The study group consisted of 58 male patients and 29 female patients and the mean age was 25.9 months. The diagnosis are global developmental delay in 26 patients, selective language impairment in 31 patients, articulation disorder in 7 patients, cerebral palsy in 8 patients, autism spectrum disorder in 4 patients, motor developmental delay in 4 patients, and others in 7 patients. Seventy-one patients are diagnosed with language developmental delay in SELSI or PRES and of them showed 69 patients a high risk in the M-B CDI-K short form. Sixteen patients are normal in SELSI or PRES and of them showed 14 patients non-high risk in the M-B CDI-K short form. The M-B CDI-K short form has 97.2% sensitivity, 87.5% specificity, a positive predictive value of 0.97, and a negative predictive value of 0.88.
CONCLUSION
The M-B CDI-K short form has a high sensitivity and specificity so it is considered as an useful screening tool in children with language developmental delay. Additional researches targeting normal children will be continued to supply the specificity of the M-B CDI-K short form.

Keyword

Language development disorders; Sensitivity and specificity

MeSH Terms

Articulation Disorders
Cerebral Palsy
Autism Spectrum Disorder
Child*
Diagnosis
Female
Humans
Infant
Language Development Disorders
Language Development*
Male
Mass Screening*
National Health Programs
Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
Sensitivity and Specificity

Cited by  3 articles

The Comparison of M-B CDI-K Short Form and K-ASQ as Screening Test for Language Development
Seong Woo Kim, Ji Yong Kim, Sang Yoon Lee, Ha Ra Jeon
Ann Rehabil Med. 2016;40(6):1108-1113.    doi: 10.5535/arm.2016.40.6.1108.

Speech and Linguistic Features of Children With Articulation Disorder
Jiyong Kim, Seong Woo Kim, Ha Ra Jeon, Mee Ryung Woo, Hyo In Kim
Ann Rehabil Med. 2017;41(5):836-842.    doi: 10.5535/arm.2017.41.5.836.

The Predictive Value of Language Scales: Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development Third Edition in Correlation With Korean Sequenced Language Scale for Infant
Joung Hyun Doh, Soo A Kim, Kiyoung Oh, Yuntae Kim, Nodam Park, Siha Park, Nam Hun Heo
Ann Rehabil Med. 2020;44(5):378-385.    doi: 10.5535/arm.19198.


Reference

1. Pae SY, Kwak KJ, Kim MB, Lee HS, Jung KH. Short form versions of MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories - Korean (M-B CDI-K). J Korean Soc Speech Sci. 2008; 15:119–129.
2. Jang JH, Park ES, Park JH, Baek JH, Won YH, Rha DW. Clinical usefulness of Capute developmental test as a screening test for detecting the language delay. J Korean Acad Rehabil Med. 2010; 34:544–549.
3. Randall D, Reynell J, Curwen M. A study of language development in a sample of 3 year old children. Br J Disord Commun. 1974; 9:3–16. PMID: 4433458.
Article
4. Burden V, Stott CM, Forge J, Goodyer I. The Cambridge Language and Speech Project (CLASP). I. Detection of language difficulties at 36 to 39 months. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1996; 38:613–631. PMID: 8674912.
5. Kim YT, Kim KH, Yoon HR, Kim WS. Sequenced language scale for infants (SELSI). 1st ed. Seoul: Special Education Publication Co.;2003.
6. Kim YT, Sung TJ, Lee YK. Preschool receptive-expressive language scale (PRES). 1st ed. Seoul: Seoul Welfare Center for People with Disabilities;2003.
7. Reese E, Read S. Predictive validity of the New Zealand MacArthur Communicative Development Inventory: words and sentences. J Child Lang. 2000; 27:255–266. PMID: 10967887.
Article
8. Westerlund M, Berglund E, Eriksson M. Can severely language delayed 3-year-olds be identified at 18 months? Evaluation of a screening version of the MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2006; 49:237–247. PMID: 16671841.
Article
9. Vach W, Bleses D, Jorgensen R. Construction of a Danish CDI short form for language screening at the age of 36 months: methodological considerations and results. Clin Linguist Phon. 2010; 24:602–621. PMID: 20524850.
Article
10. Lee YK. The relationships among language, communicative abilities and motor, cognitive, and socio-emotional development in toddlers with language delays. Korean J Commun Disord. 2011; 16:1–12.
11. Pae SY. Validity and reliability of the Korean adaptation of MCDI. Korean J Commun Disord. 2003; 8:1–14.
12. Harel S, Greenstein Y, Kramer U, Yifat R, Samuel E, Nevo Y, et al. Clinical characteristics of children referred to a child development center for evaluation of speech, language, and communication disorders. Pediatr Neurol. 1996; 15:305–311. PMID: 8972529.
Article
13. Kim SW, Shin JB, You S, Yang EJ, Lee SK, Chung HJ, et al. Diagnosis and clinical features of children with language delay. J Korean Acad Rehabil Med. 2005; 29:584–590.
14. Glascoe FP, Byrne KE, Ashford LG, Johnson KL, Chang B, Strickland B. Accuracy of the Denver-II in developmental screening. Pediatrics. 1992; 89(6 Pt 2):1221–1225. PMID: 1375732.
Article
15. Ga HY, Kwon JY. A comparison of the Korean-ages and stages questionnaires and Denver developmental delay screening test. Ann Rehabil Med. 2011; 35:369–374. PMID: 22506146.
Article
16. Deakin-Bell N, Walker K, Badawi N. The accuracy of parental concern expressed in the Ages and Stages Questionnaire to predict developmental delay. J Paediatr Child Health. 2013; 49:E133–E136. PMID: 23336747.
Article
17. Guiberson M, Rodriguez BL. Measurement properties and classification accuracy of two spanish parent surveys of language development for preschool-age children. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2010; 19:225–237. PMID: 20484705.
Article
18. Borowitz KC, Glascoe FP. Sensitivity of the Denver Developmental Screening Test in speech and language screening. Pediatrics. 1986; 78:1075–1078. PMID: 3786032.
Article
19. Kim SW, Shin JB, Kim EH, Lee SK, Jung HJ, Song DH. Diagnosis and clinical features in children referred to developmental delay Clinic. J Korean Acad Rehabil Med. 2004; 28:132–139.
20. Rydz D, Shevell MI, Majnemer A, Oskoui M. Developmental screening. J Child Neurol. 2005; 20:4–21. PMID: 15791916.
21. Frankenburg WK. Developmental surveillance and screening of infants and young children. Pediatrics. 2002; 109:144–145. PMID: 11773555.
Article
Full Text Links
  • ARM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr