Clin Orthop Surg.  2015 Jun;7(2):171-176. 10.4055/cios.2015.7.2.171.

The Avon Patellofemoral Joint Replacement: Mid-Term Prospective Results from an Independent Centre

Affiliations
  • 1Orthopaedic Department, East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust, The Conquest Hospital, Hastings, UK. sebd_b@hotmail.com

Abstract

BACKGROUND
Approximately 10% of patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee have unicompartmental OA confined to the patellofemoral joint (PFJ). The main surgical options are total knee replacement (TKR) and PFJ replacement (PFJR). PFJR has a number of advantages over TKR, including being less invasive, preserving the unaffected parts of the knee, allowing faster recovery and better range of motion and function. We report our prospective mid-term results of the Avon PFJR for established isolated PFJ arthritis in 61 consecutive procedures.
METHODS
Sixty-one Avon PFJRs were performed in 57 patients. The outcome measures were the new Oxford knee score (OKS), Hungerford and Kenna score (HKS), and Crosby Insall knee scores. Only patients with severe isolated PFJ OA were included. The diagnosis was based on a combination of clinical, radiological and, where available, arthroscopic findings.
RESULTS
Mean follow-up was 5.09 years (range, 12 to 124 years). There were 2 revisions in the first 5 years. The median HKS score was 80 (interquartile range, 70 to 95) and the mean OKS was 31.8 (+/- standard deviation, 8.7) at 5 years. These were significantly better (p < 0.001) than the preoperative scores.
CONCLUSIONS
The Avon prosthesis gives good functional outcomes in the medium term and survives well. Our data support other studies in the literature and is the largest independent prospective study to date.

Keyword

Patellofemoral joint; Arthroplasty; Survivorship; Survival rate

MeSH Terms

Aged
*Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
Female
Humans
Male
Patellofemoral Joint/*surgery
Prospective Studies
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Box plot showing the distribution of the Hungerford and Kenna score (HKS) over time. This demonstrates an improvement in the HKSs over the first five years. Pre: presurgery.

  • Fig. 2 Distribution of the mean (95% confidence interval) Oxford knee score (OKS) with time. This demonstrates an improvement in the new OKS over the first five years. Pre: presurgery.

  • Fig. 3 Kaplan-Meier survival curve for revision arthroplasty.


Reference

1. Davies AP, Vince AS, Shepstone L, Donell ST, Glasgow MM. The radiologic prevalence of patellofemoral osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002; (402):206–212.
2. Leadbetter WB. Patellofemoral arthroplasty in the treatment of patellofemoral arthritis: rationale and outcomes in younger patients. Orthop Clin North Am. 2008; 39(3):363–380.
3. Grelsamer RP, Dejour D, Gould J. The pathophysiology of patellofemoral arthritis. Orthop Clin North Am. 2008; 39(3):269–274.
4. Mihalko WM, Boachie-Adjei Y, Spang JT, Fulkerson JP, Arendt EA, Saleh KJ. Controversies and techniques in the surgical management of patellofemoral arthritis. Instr Course Lect. 2008; 57:365–380.
5. Ackroyd CE, Chir B. Development and early results of a new patellofemoral arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005; (436):7–13.
6. Ackroyd CE, Newman JH, Evans R, Eldridge JD, Joslin CC. The Avon patellofemoral arthroplasty: five-year survivorship and functional results. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007; 89(3):310–315.
7. Odumenya M, Costa ML, Parsons N, Achten J, Dhillon M, Krikler SJ. The Avon patellofemoral joint replacement: five-year results from an independent centre. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010; 92(1):56–60.
8. Cartier P, Sanouiller JL, Khefacha A. Long-term results with the first patellofemoral prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005; (436):47–54.
9. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Carr A. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998; 80(1):63–69.
10. Arciero RA, Toomey HE. Patellofemoral arthroplasty: a three- to nine-year follow-up study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988; (236):60–71.
11. Crosby EB, Insall J. Recurrent dislocation of the patella: relation of treatment to osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976; 58(1):9–13.
12. McKeever DC. Patellar prosthesis: 1955. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002; (404):3–6.
13. Blazina ME, Fox JM, Del Pizzo W, Broukhim B, Ivey FM. Patellofemoral replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979; (144):98–102.
14. Lubinus HH. Patella glide bearing total replacement. Orthopedics. 1979; 2(2):119–127.
15. Tauro B, Ackroyd CE, Newman JH, Shah NA. The Lubinus patellofemoral arthroplasty: a five- to ten-year prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001; 83(5):696–701.
16. Kooijman HJ, Driessen AP, van Horn JR. Long-term results of patellofemoral arthroplasty: a report of 56 arthroplasties with 17 years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003; 85(6):836–840.
17. Smith AM, Peckett WR, Butler-Manuel PA, Venu KM, d'Arcy JC. Treatment of patello-femoral arthritis using the Lubinus patello-femoral arthroplasty: a retrospective review. Knee. 2002; 9(1):27–30.
18. Starks I, Roberts S, White SH. The Avon patellofemoral joint replacement: independent assessment of early functional outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009; 91(12):1579–1582.
19. National Joint Registry. National Joint Registry for England and Wales: 9th annual report 2012 [Internet]. Hemel Hempstead, UK: National Joint Registry;c2014. cited 2015 Jan 14. Available from: http://www.njrcentre.org.uk/njrcentre/Portals/0/Documents/England/Reports/9th_annual_report/NJR%209th%20Annual%20Report%202012.pdf.
20. Meding JB, Wing JT, Keating EM, Ritter MA. Total knee arthroplasty for isolated patellofemoral arthritis in younger patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007; 464:78–82.
21. Mont MA, Haas S, Mullick T, Hungerford DS. Total knee arthroplasty for patellofemoral arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002; 84(11):1977–1981.
22. Hollinghurst D, Stoney J, Ward T, Pandit H, Beard D, Murray DW. In vivo sagittal plane kinematics of the Avon patellofemoral arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2007; 22(1):117–123.
23. Argenson JN, Guillaume JM, Aubaniac JM. Is there a place for patellofemoral arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995; (321):162–167.
24. Lonner JH, Jasko JG, Booth RE Jr. Revision of a failed patellofemoral arthroplasty to a total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006; 88(11):2337–2342.
Full Text Links
  • CIOS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr