1. Slooff TJ, Schimmel JW, Buma P. Cemented fixation with bone grafts. Orthop Clin North Am. 1993; 24:667–677.
2. van Egmond N, De Kam DC, Gardeniers JW, Schreurs BW. Revisions of extensive acetabular defects with impaction grafting and a cement cup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011; 469:562–573.
3. van Haaren EH, Heyligers IC, Alexander FG, Wuisman PI. High rate of failure of impaction grafting in large acetabular defects. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007; 89:296–300.
Article
4. Bostrom MP, Lehman AP, Buly RL, Lyman S, Nestor BJ. Acetabular revision with the Contour antiprotrusio cage: 2- to 5-year followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006; 453:188–194.
Article
5. Issack PS, Nousiainen M, Beksac B, Helfet DL, Sculco TP, Buly RL. Acetabular component revision in total hip of major bone loss and pelvic discontinuity. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2009; 38:550–556.
6. Sporer SM. How to do a revision total hip arthroplasty: revision of the acetabulum. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011; 93:1359–1366.
7. Borland WS, Bhattacharya R, Holland JP, Brewster NT. Use of porous trabecular metal augments with impaction bone grafting in management of acetabular bone loss. Acta Orthop. 2012; 83:347–352.
Article
8. Abolghasemian M, Tangsataporn S, Sternheim A, Backstein D, Safir O, Gross AE. Combined trabecular metal acetabular shell and augment for acetabular revision with substantial bone loss: a mid-term review. Bone Joint J. 2013; 95:166–172.
Article
9. Yun HH, Shon WY, Hong SJ, Yoon JR, Yang JH. Relationship between the pelvic osteolytic volume on computed tomography and clinical outcome in patients with cementless acetabular components. Int Orthop. 2011; 35:1453–1459.
Article
10. Suh DH, Han SB, Yun HH, Chun SK, Shon WY. Characterization of progression of pelvic osteolysis after cementless total hip arthroplasty: computed tomographic study. J Arthroplasty. 2013; 28:1851–1855.
Article
11. Reiley MA, Bond D, Branick RI, Wilson EH. Vascular complications following total hip arthroplasty. A review of the literature and a report of two cases. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984; (186):23–28.
Article
12. Patel S, Sukeik M, Haddad FS. Initial implant stability predicts migration but not failure in cementless acetabular revision with bone grafting. J Arthroplasty. 2013; 28:832–837.
Article
13. Mazhar Tokgözoğlu A, Aydin M, Atilla B, Caner B. Scintigraphic evaluation of impaction grafting for total hip arthroplasty revision. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2000; 120:416–419.
Article
14. Goldberg VM. Selection of bone grafts for revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000; (381):68–76.
Article
15. Stevenson S. Biology of bone grafts. Orthop Clin North Am. 1999; 30:543–552.
Article
16. Schimmel JW, Buma P, Versleyen D, Huiskes R, Slooff TJ. Acetabular reconstruction with impacted morselized cancellous allografts in cemented hip arthroplasty: a histological and biomechanical study on the goat. J Arthroplasty. 1998; 13:438–448.
Article
17. Etienne G, Ragland PS, Mont MA. Use of cancellous bone chips and demineralized bone matrix in the treatment of acetabular osteolysis: preliminary 2-year follow-up. Orthopedics. 2004; 27:1 Suppl. s123–s126.
Article
18. Jasty M, Harris WH. Total hip reconstruction using frozen femoral head allografts in patients with acetabular bone loss. Orthop Clin North Am. 1987; 18:291–299.
Article
19. Avci S, Connors N, Petty W. 2- to 10-year follow-up study of acetabular revisions using allograft bone to repair bone defects. J Arthroplasty. 1998; 13:61–69.
Article
20. Buttaro MA, Comba F, Pusso R, Piccaluga F. Acetabular revision with metal mesh, impaction bone grafting, and a cemented cup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008; 466:2482–2490.
Article
21. Brubaker SM, Brown TE, Manaswi A, Mihalko WM, Cui Q, Saleh KJ. Treatment options and allograft use in revision total hip arthroplasty the acetabulum. J Arthroplasty. 2007; 22:7 Suppl 3. 52–56.
22. Murphy SB. Management of acetabular bone stock deficiency. J Arthroplasty. 2005; 20:4 Suppl 2. 85–90.
23. Paprosky WG, Magnus RE. Principles of bone grafting in revision total hip arthroplasty. Acetabular technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994; (298):147–155.
Article
24. Sporer SM, O'Rourke M, Chong P, Paprosky WG. The use of structural distal femoral allografts for acetabular reconstruction. Average ten-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005; 87:760–765.
Article
25. O'Rourke MR, Paprosky WG, Rosenberg AG. Use of structural allografts in acetabular revision surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004; (420):113–121.
Article
26. Pollock FH, Whiteside LA. The fate of massive allografts in total hip acetabular revision surgery. J Arthroplasty. 1992; 7:271–276.
Article
27. Garbuz D, Morsi E, Gross AE. Revision of the acetabular component of a total hip arthroplasty with a massive structural allograft. Study with a minimum five-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996; 78:693–697.
Article
28. Gross AE. Restoration of acetabular bone loss 2005. J Arthroplasty. 2006; 21:4 Suppl 1. 117–120.
Article
29. Gross AE, Goodman S. The current role of structural grafts and cages in revision arthroplasty of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004; (429):193–200.
30. Oakes DA, Cabanela ME. Impaction bone grafting for revision hip arthroplasty: biology and clinical applications. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006; 14:620–628.
31. Patil N, Hwang K, Goodman SB. Cancellous impaction bone grafting of acetabular defects in complex primary and revision total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2012; 35:e306–e312.
Article
32. Zehntner MK, Ganz R. Midterm results (5.5-10 years) of acetabular allograft reconstruction with the acetabular reinforcement ring during total hip revision. J Arthroplasty. 1994; 9:469–479.
Article
33. Tägil M. The morselized and impacted bone graft. Animal experiments on proteins, impaction and load. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 2000; 290:1–40.
Article
34. Jasty M, Harris WH. Salvage total hip reconstruction in patients with major acetabular bone deficiency using structural femoral head allografts. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990; 72:63–67.
Article
35. Berry DJ, Müller ME. Revision arthroplasty using an antiprotrusio cage for massive acetabular bone deficiency. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992; 74:711–715.
Article
36. Peters CL, Curtain M, Samuelson KM. Acetabular revision with the Burch-Schnieder antiprotrusio cage and cancellous allograft bone. J Arthroplasty. 1995; 10:307–312.
Article
37. Gill TJ, Sledge JB, Müller ME. The Bürch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage in revision total hip arthroplasty: indications, principles and long-term results. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998; 80:946–953.
Article
38. Regis D, Sandri A, Bonetti I, Bortolami O, Bartolozzi P. A minimum of 10-year follow-up of the Burch-Schneider cage and bulk allografts for the revision of pelvic discontinuity. J Arthroplasty. 2012; 27:1057–1063.e1.
Article
39. Nehme A, Lewallen DG, Hanssen AD. Modular porous metal augments for treatment of severe acetabular bone loss during revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004; (429):201–208.
Article
40. Bobyn JD, Stackpool GJ, Hacking SA, Tanzer M, Krygier JJ. Characteristics of bone ingrowth and interface mechanics of a new porous tantalum biomaterial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999; 81:907–914.
Article
41. Van Kleunen JP, Lee GC, Lementowski PW, Nelson CL, Garino JP. Acetabular revisions using trabecular metal cups and augments. J Arthroplasty. 2009; 24:6 Suppl. 64–68.
Article
42. Ballester Alfaro JJ, Sueiro Fernández J. Trabecular Metal buttress augment and the Trabecular Metal cup-cage construct in revision hip arthroplasty for severe acetabular bone loss and pelvic discontinuity. Hip Int. 2010; 20:Suppl 7. S119–S127.
Article
43. Malhotra R, Kancherla R, Kumar V, Soral A. Trabecular metal acetabular revision system (cup-cage construct) to address the massive acetabular defects in revision arthroplasty. Indian J Orthop. 2012; 46:483–486.
Article
44. Jansen JA, van de Sande MA, Dijkstra PD. Poor long-term clinical results of saddle prosthesis after resection of periacetabular tumors. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013; 471:324–331.
Article