Yonsei Med J.  2013 Jul;54(4):912-920. 10.3349/ymj.2013.54.4.912.

Pure Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy with Ileal Conduit: A Single Surgeon's Mid-Term Outcomes

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. siseo@skku.edu
  • 2Institute for Refractory Cancer Research, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 3Department of Urology, Kangnam General Hospital, Yongin, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE
The use of laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) for muscle-invasive bladder cancer is not yet widespread because of the technical difficulties of the procedure and the lengthy operating time. In this study, we report a single surgeon's experience with LRC.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Thirty patients (25 men and 5 women) with bladder cancer underwent LRC and ileal conduit by a single surgeon between November 2007 and May 2011. An extracorporeal urinary diversion was performed through 5-6 cm midline incision for specimen extraction.
RESULTS
The median operating time and estimated blood loss were 527.5 minutes and 275 mL, respectively. There was no conversion to open surgery. The median time to oral intake and postoperative hospital stay were 5 days and 12 days, respectively. The rates of immediate, early postoperative and late postoperative complication were 3.3%, 20% and 20%, respectively. With 16 months of median follow-up, the overall and recurrence-free survival rates were 70% and 56.7%, respectively.
CONCLUSION
LRC is feasible for the management of invasive bladder cancer and, with appropriate patient selection, can be a good alternative to open or robot-assisted radical cystectomy in the era of robot-assisted surgery.

Keyword

Urinary bladder neoplasms; cystectomy; laparoscopic surgery

MeSH Terms

Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Blood Loss, Surgical
Cystectomy/*methods
Female
Humans
Length of Stay
Lymph Node Excision
Male
Middle Aged
Operative Time
Postoperative Complications/etiology
Postoperative Period
Treatment Outcome
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/pathology/*surgery
Urinary Diversion/*methods

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Fan-shaped transperitoneal placement of 5 ports for laparoscopic radical cystectomy.

  • Fig. 2 Procedures for extracorporeal ileal conduit urinary diversion. (A) Mini-laparotomy incision about 6 cm at midline with extending the camera port. (B) Extracorporeal formation of the ileal conduit segment. (C) Formation of stoma. (D) Completion of extracorporeal ileal conduit urinary diversion.

  • Fig. 3 Sequental changes in operating time (A) and estimated blood loss (B) reflecting the surgeon's learning curve.

  • Fig. 4 Kaplan-Meier plots (A) for overall survival, (B) for recurrence-free survival, (C) for recurrence-free survival stratified by pathologic T stages, and (D) by lymph node involvement status.


Reference

1. Khan MS, Elhage O, Challacombe B, Rimington P, Murphy D, Dasgupta P. Analysis of early complications of robotic-assisted radical cystectomy using a standardized reporting system. Urology. 2011; 77:357–362.
Article
2. Stein JP, Lieskovsky G, Cote R, Groshen S, Feng AC, Boyd S, et al. Radical cystectomy in the treatment of invasive bladder cancer: long-term results in 1,054 patients. J Clin Oncol. 2001; 19:666–675.
Article
3. Studer UE, Burkhard FC, Schumacher M, Kessler TM, Thoeny H, Fleischmann A, et al. Twenty years experience with an ileal orthotopic low pressure bladder substitute--lessons to be learned. J Urol. 2006; 176:161–166.
Article
4. Cathelineau X, Arroyo C, Rozet F, Barret E, Vallancien G. Laparoscopic assisted radical cystectomy: the montsouris experience after 84 cases. Eur Urol. 2005; 47:780–784.
Article
5. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004; 240:205–213.
6. Gill IS, Fergany A, Klein EA, Kaouk JH, Sung GT, Meraney AM, et al. Laparoscopic radical cystoprostatectomy with ileal conduit performed completely intracorporeally: the initial 2 cases. Urology. 2000; 56:26–29.
Article
7. Hemal AK, Singh I, Kumar R. Laparoscopic radical cystectomy and ileal conduit reconstruction: preliminary experience. J Endourol. 2003; 17:911–916.
Article
8. Simonato A, Gregori A, Lissiani A, Bozzola A, Galli S, Gaboardi F. Laparoscopic radical cystoprostatectomy: our experience in a consecutive series of 10 patients with a 3 years follow-up. Eur Urol. 2005; 47:785–790.
Article
9. Moinzadeh A, Gill IS, Desai M, Finelli A, Falcone T, Kaouk J. Laparoscopic radical cystectomy in the female. J Urol. 2005; 173:1912–1917.
Article
10. Castillo OA, Abreu SC, Mariano MB, Tefilli MV, Hoyos J, Pinto I, et al. Complications in laparoscopic radical cystectomy. The South American experience with 59 cases. Int Braz J Urol. 2006; 32:300–305.
Article
11. Gerullis H, Kuemmel C, Popken G. Laparoscopic cystectomy with extracorporeal-assisted urinary diversion: experience with 34 patients. Eur Urol. 2007; 51:193–198.
Article
12. Gao ZL, Fan J, Zhao JJ, Xia SJ, Shi L, Men CP, et al. Laparoscopic radical cystectomy with extracorporeal ileal conduit urinary diversion for treatment of Chinese bladder cancer patients. Urol Int. 2007; 79:204–209.
Article
13. Hemal AK, Kolla SB. Comparison of laparoscopic and open radical cystoprostatectomy for localized bladder cancer with 3-year oncological followup: a single surgeon experience. J Urol. 2007; 178:2340–2343.
Article
14. Makiyama K, Nakaigawa N, Murakami T, Hayashi N, Sano F, Kawahara T, et al. [Perioperative outcome of laparoscopic radical cystectomy: comparison to open radical cystectomy]. Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi. 2010; 101:721–725.
Article
15. Ha US, Kim SI, Kim SJ, Cho HJ, Hong SH, Lee JY, et al. Laparoscopic versus open radical cystectomy for the management of bladder cancer: mid-term oncological outcome. Int J Urol. 2010; 17:55–61.
Article
16. Huang J, Lin T, Liu H, Xu K, Zhang C, Jiang C, et al. Laparoscopic radical cystectomy with orthotopic ileal neobladder for bladder cancer: oncologic results of 171 cases with a median 3-year follow-up. Eur Urol. 2010; 58:442–449.
Article
17. Guru KA, Hussain A, Chandrasekhar R, Piacente P, Hussain A, Chandrasekhar R, et al. Current status of robot-assisted surgery in urology: a multi-national survey of 297 urologic surgeons. Can J Urol. 2009; 16:4736–4741.
18. Abraham JB, Young JL, Box GN, Lee HJ, Deane LA, Ornstein DK. Comparative analysis of laparoscopic and robot-assisted radical cystectomy with ileal conduit urinary diversion. J Endourol. 2007; 21:1473–1480.
Article
19. Smith A, Kurpad R, Lal A, Nielsen M, Wallen EM, Pruthi RS. Cost analysis of robotic versus open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. J Urol. 2010; 183:505–509.
Article
20. Gregori A, Galli S, Goumas I, Scieri F, Stener S, Gaboardi F. A cost comparison of laparoscopic versus open radical cystoprostatectomy and orthotopic ileal neobladder at a single institution. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2007; 79:127–129.
21. Novotny V, Hakenberg OW, Wiessner D, Heberling U, Litz RJ, Oehlschlaeger S, et al. Perioperative complications of radical cystectomy in a contemporary series. Eur Urol. 2007; 51:397–401.
Article
22. Shabsigh A, Korets R, Vora KC, Brooks CM, Cronin AM, Savage C, et al. Defining early morbidity of radical cystectomy for patients with bladder cancer using a standardized reporting methodology. Eur Urol. 2009; 55:164–174.
Article
23. Hautmann RE, de Petriconi RC, Volkmer BG. Lessons learned from 1,000 neobladders: the 90-day complication rate. J Urol. 2010; 184:990–994.
Article
24. Sung HH, Ahn JS, Seo SI, Jeon SS, Choi HY, Lee HM, et al. A comparison of early complications between open and robot-assisted radical cystectomy. J Endourol. 2012; 26:670–675.
Article
25. Orvieto MA, DeCastro GJ, Trinh QD, Jeldres C, Katz MH, Patel VR, et al. Oncological and functional outcomes after robot-assisted radical cystectomy: critical review of current status. Urology. 2011; 78:977–984.
Article
Full Text Links
  • YMJ
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr