1. Gasparyan AY, Ayvazyan L, Blackmore H, Kitas GD. Writing a narrative biomedical review: considerations for authors, peer reviewers, and editors. Rheumatol Int. 2011; 31:1409–1417.
2. Suh CO, Oh SJ, Hong ST. Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors at the forefront of improving the quality and indexing chances of its member journals. Eur Sci Ed. 2012; 38:95–96.
3. Gasparyan AY, Ayvazyan L, Kitas GD. Biomedical journal editing: elements of success. Croat Med J. 2011; 52:423–428.
4. Balhara YP. Indexed journal: what does it mean? Lung India. 2012; 29:193.
5. Hrastinski S, Aghaee NM. How are campus students using social media to support their studies? an explorative interview study. Educ Inf Technol. 2012; 17:451–464.
6. Masic I, Sivic S, Pandza H. Social networks in medical education in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Mater Sociomed. 2012; 24:162–164.
7. Masic I, Milinovic K. On-line biomedical databases-the best source for quick search of the scientific information in the biomedicine. Acta Inform Med. 2012; 20:72–84.
8. Lippi G, Favalor EJ, Simundic AM. Biomedical research platforms and their influence on article submissions and journal rankings: an update. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2012; 22:7–14.
9. Marx W. Tracking historical papers and their citations. Eur Sci Ed. 2012; 38:35–37.
10. Gasparyan AY, Kitas GD. Best peer reviewers and the quality of peer review in biomedical journals. Croat Med J. 2012; 53:386–389.
12. Falagas ME, Pitsouni EI, Malietzis GA, Pappas G. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. FASEB J. 2008; 22:338–342.
13. Bornmann L, Marx W, Gasparyan AY, Kitas GD. Diversity, value and limitations of the journal impact factor and alternative metrics. Rheumatol Int. 2012; 32:1861–1867.
14. Marušić A, Marušić M. Can small journals provide leadership? Lancet. 2012; 379:1361–1363.