J Korean Med Sci.  2012 Dec;27(12):1453-1459. 10.3346/jkms.2012.27.12.1453.

A New Disability Rating Method according to the Job Using the Korean Academy of Medical Science Disability Guideline

• Won JU
• Yu JY
• Kwon YJ
• Kim Y
• Rhie JB
• Jeong IC

• KMID: 2157966
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2012.27.12.1453

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to develop a disability rating scale according to job classification using the Korean Academy of Medical Society (KAMS) guidelines. All jobs were categorized based on their level of physical activity and professional skills. The KAMS guidelines were used for the impairment rating. We modified the California Schedule for rating permanent disabilities. The differences were plotted to compare between the impairment rate and the job-adjusted disability rate. The KAMS job-adjusted disability rates were then compared to the McBride and workers' compensation rates. A total of 1,206 occupations were classified into 44 groups. The occupational disability indexes were rated on a scale of 1 to 7. The differences in the McBride disability rates varied inconsistently from 0% to 35%, while the differences in the KAMS disability rates were between 0% and 18%. The KAMS disability rates were slightly higher than the McBride disability rates for the upper extremities, but were lower for the lower extremities and internal organs. This is the first Korean job-adjusted disability rating method. There are several limitations, but its impairment rating is more scientific and reflects the current Korean occupational environment.

Keyword

Disability Evaluation; Impairment; Compensation and Redress; Workers' Compensation; Occupations

MeSH Terms

Academies and Institutes
Asian Continental Ancestry Group
*Disability Evaluation
Humans
Occupations/statistics & numerical data
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Program Development
Republic of Korea
Severity of Illness Index
Workers' Compensation/statistics & numerical data

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1 Differences of rate between disability rate and impairment rate in McBride.

• 

  Fig. 2 Differences of rate between disability rate and impairment rate in KAMS Guideline.

Reference

1. Rondinelli RD. Changes for the new AMA Guides to impairment ratings, 6th Edition: implications and applications for physician disability evaluations. PM R. 2009. 1:643–656.

2. McBride ED. Disability Evaluation and Principles of Treatment of Compensable Injuries. 1963. 6th ed. Philadelphia: B. Lippincott Company.

3. Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act. Act No. 11141. 2010. Seoul, Korea: Ministry of Employment and Labor.

4. Act on Guarantee of Compensation for Loss caused by Automobile. Act No 9450. 2009. Korea: Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs.

5. Hwang EA, Kim JM. Understanding the Principle of McBride's Disability Evaluation and the correction of errors in the section for the finger ankylosis. Indep Med Exam. 2009. 6:27–32.

6. Chung YG. A rivised criteria for evaluation of Disability from Industrial Injuries. Indep Med Exam. 2010. 7:1–13.

7. Rice DP, Kelman S, Miller LS. Estimates of economic costs of alcohol and drug abuse and mental illness, 1985 and 1988. Public Health Rep. 1991. 106:280–292.

8. Haveman R, Wolfe B, Buron L, Hili S. The loss of earnings capability from disability/health limitations: toward a new social indicator. Review Income Wealth. 1995. 41:289–308.

9. Schedule for Rating Permanent disability under the Provisions of the Labor Code of the State of California. Labor code section 4660. 2005. State of California:

10. Sohn MS, Lee KS, Park DS, Won JU, Chung YG. Guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment: comentary and case study. 2011. 1st ed. Seoul, Korea: Korean Academy of Medical Science.

11. Rondinelli RD, Genovese E, Katz R, Mayer T, Mueller K, Ranavaya M, Brigham CR. American Medical Association. Guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment. 2008. 6th ed. Chicago, Ill.: American Medical Association.

12. Lee KS, Won JU, Kim SY, Sohn MS, Youm YS, Lee YS, Kim DJ, Cho SH, Lee MJ, Choi JS. Development of the Korean Academy of Medical Sciences Guideline for rating physical impairment. J Korean Med Sci. 2009. 24:S221–S226.

13. Korea National Stattistical Office. Korean Standard Classification of Occupations. 2007. 6th ed. Seoul:

14. Lee YS, Youn JY, Leem MY. 2007 Korea Job Dictionary. 2006. Seoul: Korea Employment Information Service.

15. Kim JJ. 2008 Korean Job Dictionary. 2007. Seoul: Korea Employment Information Service.

16. Park BS, Kim JJ, Park SC, Kwon HJ, Kang OH, Kim JS. 2009 Korean Job Dictionary. 2008. Seoul: Korea Employment Information Service.

17. Williams CD. Disability and occupational assessment: objective diagnosis and quantitative impairment rating. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2010. 18:336–352.

18. Youm Y, Lee MJ, Hwang SC. Consensus making process in the Korean Academy of Medical Sciences Guideline for Physical Impairment: evaluation as a social process. J Korean Med Sci. 2009. 24:S242–S246.

19. Park JH, Kim HC, Lee JH, Kim JS, Roh SY, Yi CH, Kang YK, Kwon BS. Development of Korean Academy of Medical Sciences Guideline for rating physical disability of upper extremity. J Korean Med Sci. 2009. 24:S288–S298.

20. Kim HC, Kim JS, Lee KH, Lee HS, Choi ES, Yu JY. Development of Korean Academy of Medical Sciences Guideline rating the physical impairment: lower extremities. J Korean Med Sci. 2009. 24:S299–S306.

21. Jang SH, Rah UW, Kim YC, Park YS, Jo D. Development of Korean Academy of Medical Sciences guideline-rating the impairment in pain. J Korean Med Sci. 2009. 24:S330–S337.

22. Park CW, Do NY, Rha KS, Chung SM, Kwon YJ. Development of guideline for rating the physical impairment of otolaryngologic field. J Korean Med Sci. 2009. 24:S258–S266.