Korean J Neurotrauma.  2014 Apr;10(1):6-9. 10.13004/kjnt.2014.10.1.6.

Preliminary Report of Combined Microscopic Fragmentectomy and Nucleoplasty for Sequestrated Lumbar Disc Herniation

• Kim JH
• Kim SW

• KMID: 2156090
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.13004/kjnt.2014.10.1.6

Abstract

OBJECTIVE
This retrospective study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of combined microscopic fragmentectomy and intraoperative nucleoplasty for sequestrated lumbar disc herniation.
METHODS
Twenty-four patients with magnetic resonance imaging proven sequestrated lumbar disc herniation with small annular leak treated by microscopic fragmentectomy and nucleoplasty were included. Patients were followed for at least one year. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI; version 2.0) was used to assess preoperative and postoperative functional statuses in three age groups (20-40, 41-60, and >60 years). Visual analog scale and modified MacNab's criteria were used to assess the clinical outcomes for spinal surgery.
RESULTS
Mean age at operation was 41.2 years (range 20-72 years). ODIs improved significantly regardless of age group. Significant pain relief was achieved at 1 year after surgery. Most patients (92%) had an excellent or good result according to modified MacNab's criteria, and all patients showed symptomatic improvement after surgery. There were two postoperative wound-related complications, and both responded to antibiotics. No patient underwent further additional surgery because of disc re-herniation during follow-up.
CONCLUSION
This study shows that combined microscopic fragmentectomy and intraoperative nucleoplasty without additional discectomy provides a safe operative option for the treatment of sequestrated lumbar disc herniation with small annular leak.

Keyword

Disc herniation; Fragmentectomy; Nucleoplasty

MeSH Terms

Anti-Bacterial Agents
Diskectomy
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Retrospective Studies
Visual Analog Scale
Anti-Bacterial Agents

Reference

1. Chen YC, Lee SH, Chen D. Intradiscal pressure study of percutaneous disc decompression with nucleoplasty in human cadavers. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003; 28:661–665. PMID: 12671352.

2. Cho BH, Kim SW, Lee SM, Shin H. The factors affecting the low back pain after microscopic discectomy. Korean J Spine. 2006; 3:158–161.

3. Cuellar VG, Cuellar JM, Vaccaro AR, Carragee EJ, Scuderi GJ. Accelerated degeneration after failed cervical and lumbar nucleoplasty. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010; 23:521–524. PMID: 21131800.

4. Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB. The Oswestry Disability Index. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000; 25:2940–2952. discussion 2952. PMID: 11074683.

5. Fardon DF, Milette PC. Combined Task Forces of the North American Spine Society. American Society of Spine Radiology. American Society of Neuroradiology. Nomenclature and classification of lumbar disc pathology. Recommendations of the Combined task Forces of the North American Spine Society, American Society of Spine Radiology, and American Society of Neuroradiology. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001; 26:E93–E113. PMID: 11242399.

6. Ha JG, Park JH, Jeon SR. Clinical and radiological outcome analysis on anterior cervical discectomy and interbody fusion using hydroxyapatite block. J Korean Neurotraumatol Soc. 2011; 7:63–67.

7. Kim SW, Lee SM, Shin H. Radiofrequency facet denervation for low back pain after microscopic discectomy. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2005; 38:442–444.

8. Rogers LA. Experience with limited versus extensive disc removal in patients undergoing microsurgical operations for ruptured lumbar discs. Neurosurgery. 1988; 22(1 Pt 1):82–85. PMID: 3344091.

9. Shabat S, David R, Folman Y. Nucleoplasty is effective in reducing both mechanical and radicular low back pain: a prospective study in 87 patients. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2012; 25:329–332. PMID: 22124428.

10. Shao Z, Rompe G, Schiltenwolf M. Radiographic changes in the lumbar intervertebral discs and lumbar vertebrae with age. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002; 27:263–268. PMID: 11805689.

11. Wenger M, Mariani L, Kalbarczyk A, Gröger U. Long-term outcome of 104 patients after lumbar sequestrectomy according to Williams. Neurosurgery. 2001; 49:329–334. discussion 334-335. PMID: 11504108.

12. Wera GD, Dean CL, Ahn UM, Marcus RE, Cassinelli EH, Bohlman HH, et al. Reherniation and failure after lumbar discectomy: a comparison of fragment excision alone versus subtotal discectomy. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008; 21:316–319. PMID: 18600139.

13. Williams RW. Microlumbar discectomy: a conservative surgical approach to the virgin herniated lumbar disc. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1978; 3:175–182. PMID: 663769.