Hanyang Med Rev.  2015 Feb;35(1):40-43. 10.7599/hmr.2015.35.1.40.

Understanding Effect Sizes

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea. hiitsme@snubh.org

Abstract

In most medical research the P value is commonly used to describe test results. Because the power of statistical test is influenced by sample size, the null hypothesis can be rejected (P<0.05) in most cases if the sample size is tremendously big even if the real difference (or relationship) is extremly small. To overcome the weakness of using the P value, effect size can be used in the statistical analysis. Effect size can be defined as the "degree to which the phenomenon (difference or relationship) is present in the population". The effect size is used in sample size calculation, data interpretation and conducting meta-analysis. This manuscript describes limitations in using the P value and further introduces the concept of effect size.

Keyword

Data Interpretation, Statistical; Meta-Analysis; Research Design

MeSH Terms

Data Interpretation, Statistical
Research Design
Sample Size

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Example of effect size=1.96. The mean of the treatment group is in the range of upper 5% of the control group.


Cited by  4 articles

Why Perform Meta-Analysis?
Woo Jong Shin
Hanyang Med Rev. 2015;35(1):1-2.    doi: 10.7599/hmr.2015.35.1.1.

Effect of Debriefing Based on the Clinical Judgment Model on Simulation Based Learning Outcomes of End-of-Life Care for Nursing Students: A Non-Randomized Controlled Trial
Kyung In Jeong, Ja Yun Choi
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2017;47(6):842-853.    doi: 10.4040/jkan.2017.47.6.842.

Tips for troublesome sample-size calculation
Junyong In, Hyun Kang, Jong Hae Kim, Tae Kyun Kim, Eun Jin Ahn, Dong Kyu Lee, Sangseok Lee, Jae Hong Park
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2020;73(2):114-120.    doi: 10.4097/kja.19497.

Introducing big data analysis using data from National Health Insurance Service
EunJin Ahn
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2020;73(3):205-211.    doi: 10.4097/kja.20129.


Reference

1. Wilkinson L. Statistical methods in psychology journals: guidelines and explanations. Am Psychol. 1999; 54:594–604.
Article
2. Olejnik S, Algina J. Measures of effect size for comparative studies: applications, interpretations, and limitations. Contemp Educ Psychol. 2000; 25:241–286.
Article
3. Anderson DR, Burnham KP, Thompson WL. Null hypothesis testing: problems, prevalence, and an alternative. J wildl Manage. 2000; 64:912–923.
Article
4. McGraw KO, Wong SP. A common language effect size statistic. Psychol Bull. 1992; 111:361–365.
Article
5. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates;1988.
Full Text Links
  • HMR
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr