Clin Endosc.  2015 Sep;48(5):356-360. 10.5946/ce.2015.48.5.356.

Endoscope Reprocessing: Update on Controversial Issues

• Choi HH
• Cho YS

• KMID: 2148543
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2015.48.5.356

Abstract

Several issues concerning endoscope reprocessing remain unresolved based on currently available data. Thus, further studies are required to confirm standard practices including safe endoscope shelf life, proper frequency of replacement of some accessories including water bottles and connecting tubes, and microbiological surveillance testing of endoscopes after reprocessing. The efficacy and cost-effectiveness of newer technology that allows automated cleaning and disinfection is one such controversial issue. In addition, there are no guidelines on whether delayed reprocessing and extended soaking may harm endoscope integrity or increase the bioburden on the external or internal device surfaces. In this review, we discuss the unresolved and controversial issues regarding endoscope reprocessing.

Keyword

Reprocessing; Endoscopy; Disinfection

MeSH Terms

Disinfection
Endoscopes*
Endoscopy
Water
Water

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1 Correct endoscope storage after reprocessing. Endoscopes are hung vertically in a clean, well-ventilated cabinet without caps, valves, and other detachable components to facilitate drying.

Reference

1. Lee YK, Park JB. Steps of reprocessing and equipments. Clin Endosc. 2013; 46:274–279. PMID: 23767039.

2. ASGE Quality Assurance In Endoscopy Committee. Petersen BT, Chennat J, et al. Multisociety guideline on reprocessing flexible gastrointestinal endoscopes: 2011. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011; 73:1075–1084. PMID: 21628008.

3. Recommended practices for cleaning and processing endoscopes and endoscope accessories. In : Conner R, Blanchard JC, editors. AORN. Perioperative Standards and Recommended Practices. Denver: AORN Inc.;2010. p. 405–419.

4. Beilenhoff U, Neumann CS, Rey JF, et al. ESGE-ESGENA Guideline: cleaning and disinfection in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Endoscopy. 2008; 40:939–957. PMID: 19009486.

5. Society of Gastroenterology Nureses and Associates, Inc. Standards of infection control in reprocessing of flexible gastrointestinal endoscopes, 2012 [Internet]. Chicago: SGNA;c2015. cited 2015 Sep 15. Available from: http://www.sgna.org.

6. Taylor A, Jones D, Everts R, et al. Infection Control in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Victoria: Gastroenterological Society of Australia;2010.

7. Alvarado CJ, Reichelderfer M. APIC guideline for infection prevention and control in flexible endoscopy. Association for Professionals in Infection Control. Am J Infect Control. 2000; 28:138–155. PMID: 10760223.

8. Hong KH, Lim YJ. Recent update of gastrointestinal endoscope reprocessing. Clin Endosc. 2013; 46:267–273. PMID: 23767038.

9. Alfa MJ, Sepehri S, Olson N, Wald A. Establishing a clinically relevant bioburden benchmark: a quality indicator for adequate reprocessing and storage of flexible gastrointestinal endoscopes. Am J Infect Control. 2012; 40:233–236. PMID: 21704429.

10. Weber DJ. Managing and preventing exposure events from inappropriately reprocessed endoscopes. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2012; 33:657–660. PMID: 22669225.

11. Seoane-Vazquez E, Rodriguez-Monguio R, Visaria J, Carlson A. Endoscopy-related infections and toxic reactions: an international comparison. Endoscopy. 2007; 39:742–746. PMID: 17583855.

12. Nelson DB, Muscarella LF. Current issues in endoscope reprocessing and infection control during gastrointestinal endoscopy. World J Gastroenterol. 2006; 12:3953–3964. PMID: 16810740.

13. Dirlam Langlay AM, Ofstead CL, Mueller NJ, Tosh PK, Baron TH, Wetzler HP. Reported gastrointestinal endoscope reprocessing lapses: the tip of the iceberg. Am J Infect Control. 2013; 41:1188–1194. PMID: 24021660.

14. Ross AS, Baliga C, Verma P, Duchin J, Gluck M. A quarantine process for the resolution of duodenoscope-associated transmission of multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015; 82:477–483. PMID: 26092616.

15. Riley R, Beanland C, Bos H. Establishing the shelf life of flexible colonoscopes. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2002; 25:114–119. PMID: 12055379.

16. Riley RG, Beanland CJ, Polglase AL. Extending the shelf-life of decontaminated flexible colonoscopes. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003; 18:1004–1005. PMID: 12859737.

17. Rejchrt S, Cermák P, Pavlatová L, McKová E, Bures J. Bacteriologic testing of endoscopes after high-level disinfection. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004; 60:76–78. PMID: 15229429.

18. Osborne S, Reynolds S, George N, Lindemayer F, Gill A, Chalmers M. Challenging endoscopy reprocessing guidelines: a prospective study investigating the safe shelf life of flexible endoscopes in a tertiary gastroenterology unit. Endoscopy. 2007; 39:825–830. PMID: 17703393.

19. Vergis AS, Thomson D, Pieroni P, Dhalla S. Reprocessing flexible gastrointestinal endoscopes after a period of disuse: is it necessary? Endoscopy. 2007; 39:737–739. PMID: 17661250.

20. Ingram J, Gaines P, Kite R, Morgan M, Spurling S, Winsett RP. Evaluation of medically significant bacteria in colonoscopes after 8 weeks of shelf life in open air storage. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2013; 36:106–111. PMID: 23549213.

21. Brock AS, Steed LL, Freeman J, Garry B, Malpas P, Cotton P. Endoscope storage time: assessment of microbial colonization up to 21 days after reprocessing. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015; 81:1150–1154. PMID: 25484321.

22. Bader L, Blumenstock G, Birkner B, et al. HYGEA (hygiene in gastroenterology: endoscope reprocessing): study on quality of reprocessing flexible endoscopes in hospitals and in the practice setting. Z Gastroenterol. 2002; 40:157–170. PMID: 11901449.

23. Doherty DE, Falko JM, Lefkovitz N, Rogers J, Fromkes J. Pseudomonas aeruginosa sepsis following retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Dig Dis Sci. 1982; 27:169–170. PMID: 7075412.

24. Society of Gastroenterology Nurses and Associates, Inc. SGNA position statement: reprocessing of water bottles used during endoscopy. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2010; 33:81–82. PMID: 20145458.

25. ASGE Technology Committee. Desilets D, Kaul V, et al. Automated endoscope reprocessors. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010; 72:675–680. PMID: 20883843.

26. Bisset L, Cossart YE, Selby W, et al. A prospective study of the efficacy of routine decontamination for gastrointestinal endoscopes and the risk factors for failure. Am J Infect Control. 2006; 34:274–280. PMID: 16765205.

27. Pajkos A, Vickery K, Cossart Y. Is biofilm accumulation on endoscope tubing a contributor to the failure of cleaning and decontamination? J Hosp Infect. 2004; 58:224–229. PMID: 15501338.

28. Alfa MJ, DeGagne P, Olson N, Fatima I. EVOTECH endoscope cleaner and reprocessor (ECR) simulated-use and clinical-use evaluation of cleaning efficacy. BMC Infect Dis. 2010; 10:200. PMID: 20618935.

29. Rutala WA, Weber DJ. New developments in reprocessing semicritical items. Am J Infect Control. 2013; 41(5 Suppl):S60–S66. PMID: 23622752.

30. Forte L, Shum C. Comparative cost-efficiency of the EVOTECH endoscope cleaner and reprocessor versus manual cleaning plus automated endoscope reprocessing in a real-world Canadian hospital endoscopy setting. BMC Gastroenterol. 2011; 11:105. PMID: 21967345.

31. Agrawal D, Muscarella LF. Delayed reprocessing of endoscopes. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011; 73:853–854. PMID: 21457830.

32. Catalone B, Koos G. Avoiding reprocessing errors critical for infection prevention and control 2005 [Internet]. Center Valley: Olympus America;c2015. cited 2015 Sep 15. Available from: http://www.olympusamerica.com/msg_section/files/mic0605p74.pdf.

33. Alfa MJ, Howie R. Modeling microbial survival in buildup biofilm for complex medical devices. BMC Infect Dis. 2009; 9:56. PMID: 19426471.

34. Muthiah KC, Enns R, Armstrong D, et al. A survey of the practice of after-hours and emergency endoscopy in Canada. Can J Gastroenterol. 2012; 26:871–876. PMID: 23248785.