J Korean Soc Microbiol.
2000 Aug;35(4):289-297.
Comparison of infrequent restriction site-polymerase chain reaction and
pulsed-field gel electrophoresis for molecular typing of Staphylococcus
aureus and Escherichia coli
- Affiliations
-
- 1Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine,
Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.
Abstract
- BACKGROUND
Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) and Escherichia
coli (E. coli) are major pathogens in community and hospital. And they
sometimes cause the outbreak in hospital in the immunocompromised
patients. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) has been regarded as a
standard method for genotyping in epidemiologic studies, but it is
laborious and time-consuming. Infrequent restriction site-polymerase
chain reaction (IRS-PCR), a new genotyping methods, was performed to
compare the applicability with PFGE. METHODS: We performed PFGE and
IRS-PCR on S. aurues (n=120) and E. coli (n=117) which were collected
clinically in 4 different hospitals. We assessed each method in terms of
discriminatory power, quality, and efficiency. RESULTS: In E. coli, the
discriminatory power of IRS-PCR was 46.7apprx86.7%, and that of PFGE was
88.9apprx96.7% according to hospital. But in S. aurues, the
discriminatory power of IRS-PCR was 20apprx56.7%, and that of PFGE was
40apprx90% according to hospital. The typicality and reproducibility of
IRS-PCR were 100% of each. PFGE needed four days to complete the
procedure, but IRS-PCR could be performed within one day, IRS-PCR showed
better resolution than PFGE. CONCLUSION: In case of gram negative
bacteria (like E. coli), IRS-PCR could be a reliable alternative for
epidemiologic typing due to better efficiency and comparable
discriminatory power. But in the case of gram positive bacteria (like S.
aureus), IRS-PCR does not seem to be suitable for the strain-to-strain
differentiation. More trials and changes of restriction enzymes or
primers could reveal the efficacy of IRS-PCR in the field of molecular
typing.