J Korean Ophthalmol Soc.  2001 Nov;42(11):1515-1522.

Clinical Experience of Orbital wall Reconstruction using Medpor(R) Barrier Sheet Implant

• Bae JH
• Kwak MS

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate surgical effect of Medpor(R) Barrier Sheet, by comparing with postoperative outcomes using Medpor(R) Barrier Sheet and Medpor(R) in orbital wall reconstruction. METHOD: We have retrospectively analyzed clinical features and postoperative outcomes in two groups. One group is 29 patients who had undergone orbital wall reconstruction using Medpor(R) Barrier Sheet, the other group is 26 patients who had undergone orbital wall reconstruction using Medpor(R).
RESULTS
The violence was the most common cause of the orbital wall fractures, the most common fracture site was inferior wall in the two groups. There were no significant differences between the two groups in improvement of diplopia and limitation of extraocular movement(p>0.05). The mean amount of enophthalmic correction were 1.15 mm in Medpor(R) Barrier Sheet group and 1.39 mm in Medpor(R) group. Three cases of Medpor(R) Barrier Sheet group and two cases of Medpor(R) group caused the infraorbital hypoesthesia, but prolapse or dislocation of implant was not found in the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS
In this study, Medpor(R) Barrier Sheet had similar surgical effect to regular Medpor(R); its advantages over regular Medpor(R) were easy intraoperative manipulation and less adherence of extraocular muscle in reconstruction of orbital wall fractures. But when cost- effectiveness is considered, Medpor(R) Barrier Sheet may be a good available implant in orbital wall reconstruction for the selective cases with extraocular muscle exposed.

Keyword

Medpor(R) Barrier Sheet; Medpor(R); Orbital-wall fractures

MeSH Terms

Diplopia
Dislocations
Humans
Hypesthesia
Orbit*
Prolapse
Retrospective Studies
Violence