J Adv Prosthodont.  2013 Aug;5(3):256-261. 10.4047/jap.2013.5.3.256.

Computerized analysis of occlusal contacts in bruxism patients treated with occlusal splint therapy

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey. ondergumus@yahoo.com
  • 2Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Suleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey.
  • 3Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Kirikkale University, Kirikkale, Turkey.

Abstract

PURPOSE
Occlusal splints are commonly used to prevent tooth wear caused by bruxism. However, the effects of splints on occlusion are still unclear. Although it is rarely alluded in literature, splints can provoke severe occlusal alterations and other complications. This study was aimed to identify differences in the responses of individuals with bruxism and healthy individuals to a full-arch maxillary stabilization splint in terms of occlusal changes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Occlusal contacts in 20 (5 male, 15 female) bruxism patients and 20 (5 male, 15 female) controls with normal occlusion were evaluated before and after occlusal splint therapy. T-Scan III, a computerized occlusal analysis system, was used to simultaneously measure occlusion and disclusion times as well as left-right and anterior-posterior contact distributions before splint therapy and 3 months after therapy. Wilcoxon and Mann-Whitney U tests were used for statistical analyses (alpha=.05).
RESULTS
No differences were found in the posterior contact of bruxism patients before and after stabilization splint treatment. However, differences in posterior contact were observed between bruxists and normal individuals prior to treatment, and this difference disappeared following treatment.
CONCLUSION
The results of this study showed the use of a stabilization splint may not have an effect on occlusion. However, the area of posterior occlusal contact among bruxists was found to be greater than that of normal individuals. According to this study, the clinical use of splints may be harmless.

Keyword

Occlusal splints; Bruxism; T-Scan; Contact area; Occlusion

MeSH Terms

Bruxism
Humans
Male
Occlusal Splints
Splints
Tooth Wear

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Posterior and left-side contact distributions for each group.

  • Fig. 2 Representative T-Scan images for each group. (A) Control, (B) Pre-treatment, (C) Post-treatment.


Reference

1. Attanasio R. An overview of bruxism and its management. Dent Clin North Am. 1997; 41:229–241.
2. The glossary of prosthodontic terms. J Prosthet Dent. 2005; 94:10–92.
3. Bader G, Lavigne G. Sleep bruxism; an overview of an oromandibular sleep movement disorder. Sleep Med Rev. 2000; 4:27–43.
4. Lobbezoo F, van der Zaag J, Naeije M. Bruxism: its multiple causes and its effects on dental implants - an updated review. J Oral Rehabil. 2006; 33:293–300.
5. Lavigne GJ, Khoury S, Abe S, Yamaguchi T, Raphael K. Bruxism physiology and pathology: an overview for clinicians. J Oral Rehabil. 2008; 35:476–494.
6. Lobbezoo F, van der Zaag J, van Selms MK, Hamburger HL, Naeije M. Principles for the management of bruxism. J Oral Rehabil. 2008; 35:509–523.
7. Johansson A, Omar R, Carlsson GE. Bruxism and prosthetic treatment: a critical review. J Prosthodont Res. 2011; 55:127–136.
8. Nassif NJ, al-Ghamdi KS. Managing bruxism and temporomandibular disorders using a centric relation occlusal device. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 1999; 20:1071–1074. 10761078
9. Forssell H, Kalso E, Koskela P, Vehmanen R, Puukka P, Alanen P. Occlusal treatments in temporomandibular disorders: a qualitative systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Pain. 1999; 83:549–560.
10. Dao TT, Lavigne GJ. Oral splints: the crutches for temporomandibular disorders and bruxism? Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 1998; 9:345–361.
11. Magdaleno F, Ginestal E. Side effects of stabilization occlusal splints: a report of three cases and literature review. Cranio. 2010; 28:128–135.
12. Fujii T, Torisu T, Nakamura S. A change of occlusal conditions after splint therapy for bruxers with and without pain in the masticatory muscles. Cranio. 2005; 23:113–118.
13. Fujii T. Occlusal conditions just after the relief of temporomandibular joint clicking. Cranio. 1999; 17:143–148.
14. Cohen-Levy J, Cohen N. Computerized analysis of occlusal contacts after lingual orthodontic treatment in adults. Int Orthod. 2011; 9:410–431.
15. Kerstein RB. Articulating paper mark misconceptions and computerized occlusal analysis technology. Dent Implantol Update. 2008; 19:41–46.
16. Carey JP, Craig M, Kerstein RB, Radke J. Determining a relationship between applied occlusal load and articulating paper mark area. Open Dent J. 2007; 1:1–7.
17. Koos B, Godt A, Schille C, Göz G. Precision of an instrumentation-based method of analyzing occlusion and its resulting distribution of forces in the dental arch. J Orofac Orthop. 2010; 71:403–410.
18. Throckmorton GS, Rasmussen J, Caloss R. Calibration of T-Scan sensors for recording bite forces in denture patients. J Oral Rehabil. 2009; 36:636–643.
19. Kerstein RB, Lowe M, Harty M, Radke J. A force reproduction analysis of two recording sensors of a computerized occlusal analysis system. Cranio. 2006; 24:15–24.
20. Hützen D, Rebau M, Kordass B. Clinical reproducibility of GEDAS - Greifswald Digital Analyzing System for displaying occlusal contact patterns. Int J Comput Dent. 2006; 9:137–142.
21. Garrido García VC, García Cartagena A, González Sequeros O. Evaluation of occlusal contacts in maximum intercuspation using the T-Scan system. J Oral Rehabil. 1997; 24:899–903.
22. González Sequeros O, Garrido García VC, García Cartagena A. Study of occlusal contact variability within individuals in a position of maximum intercuspation using the T-SCAN system. J Oral Rehabil. 1997; 24:287–290.
23. Saraçoğlu A, Ozpinar B. In vivo and in vitro evaluation of occlusal indicator sensitivity. J Prosthet Dent. 2002; 88:522–526.
24. Kenji O, Shigezo H, Iwao H. A clinical application of the T-Scan II system-usefulness for evaluating occlusal contacts of complete denture wearers. Kokubyo Gakkai Zasshi. 2002; 69:277–284.
25. Carlsson GE. Some dogmas related to prosthodontics, temporomandibular disorders and occlusion. Acta Odontol Scand. 2010; 68:313–322.
26. Stapelmann H, Türp JC. The NTI-tss device for the therapy of bruxism, temporomandibular disorders, and headache -where do we stand? A qualitative systematic review of the literature. BMC Oral Health. 2008; 8:22.
27. Klasser GD, Greene CS. Oral appliances in the management of temporomandibular disorders. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009; 107:212–223.
28. Jokstad A. The NTI-tss device may be used successfully in the management of bruxism and TMD. Evid Based Dent. 2009; 10:23.
29. Kerstein RB, Wright NR. Electromyographic and computer analyses of patients suffering from chronic myofascial paindysfunction syndrome: before and after treatment with immediate complete anterior guidance development. J Prosthet Dent. 1991; 66:677–686.
30. Kerstein RB. Disocclusion time-reduction therapy with immediate complete anterior guidance development to treat chronic myofascial pain-dysfunction syndrome. Quintessence Int. 1992; 23:735–747.
31. Kerstein RB. Reducing chronic masseter and temporalis muscular hyperactivity with computer-guided occlusal adjustments. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2010; 31:530–534. 536538
Full Text Links
  • JAP
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr