J Korean Radiol Soc.
1995 Dec;33(6):853-860.
Odontogenic Versus Nonodontogenic Deep Neck Space Infections: CT Manifestations
Abstract
- PURPOSE
The purpose of this study was to evaluate computed tomographic
(CT) findings of deep neck space infection(DNSI) with particular attention to the
differences in the spaces involved and in complications between odontogenic
and nonodontogenic groups.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Forty-four patients(21 odontogenic and 23 nonodontogenic)
were included in this study. Among odontogenic DNSls, 15 had the
dental infection in the second or third mandibular molar. We compared the CT
features between odontogenic and nonodontogenic DNSIs with special emphasis
on the differences in the spaces involved and in the rate and type of complications.
RESULTS
In all patients, CT clearly differentiated abscess from cellulitis. The
most common spaces involved in 21 patients with odontogenic DNSl were the
parapharyngeal(n=18), the submandibular(n=18), the anterior visceral(n=13),
the masticator(n=9), and the sublingual(n=7) spaces. In contrast, in 23 patients
with nonodontogenic DNSI, the anterior visceral space(n=14) was most frequently
involved. The parapharyngeal, the submandibular, and the masticator
spaces were statistically more frequently involved in odontogenic than in nonodontogenic
DNSI(p<.05). Twenty-two patients had one or more complications
shown by CT, of which airway compromise was more frequent and severe
in odontogenicthan in nonodontogenic DNSI.
CONCLUSION
We conclude that the parapharyngeal, the submandibular, and the
masticator spaces are more significantly vulnerable in odontogenic DNSl than in
nonodontogenic DNSl. The predilection for certain spaces of the neck in odontogenic
DNSl seems to originate from the intimate relationship of the mandibular
molars to the adjacent deep neck spaces.