Clinical Significance of Intrahepatic Biliary Stricture: The Impact on Efficacy of Hepatic Resection in Intrahepatic Stones

Paik, In Sik; Sung, Chun Ki; Kim, Kon Hong

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the Far East, it is well known that hepatic resection is a best form of treatment for complicated intrahepatic stones (IHS). However, many investigators have reported that the associated intrahepatic biliary stricture is the main cause of treatment failure, requiring additional management because of recurrent cholangitis. PURPOSE: A retrospective comparative study was undertaken to clarify the long term efficacy of hepatic resection in IHS and to investigate the clinical significance of intrahepatic biliary stricture affected on treatment failure after hepatic resection. Patient and METHOD: The clinical records of 44 among 51 consecutive patients with symptomatic IHS who underwent hepatic segmentectomy or lobectomy between July 1986 and October 1996 were reviewed. We excluded 7 patients from study group because of postoperative death or incomplete follow- up. Patients were divided into two study groups: group A with intrahepatic biliary stricture (n=28) and group B without stricture (n=16). Residual or recurrent stones, recurrence of intrahepatic biliary stricture, late cholangitis, and final outcomes were analyzed and compared statistically between group A and B. Patients were followed up for a median duration of 65 months after hepatectomy.
RESULTS
The overall incidence of residual or recurrent stones were 36% and 11%, respectively. The initial treatment failure rate was 50% in group A and 31% in group B. Intrahepatic biliary stricture was recurred in 46% of group A, but in none of group B (P=0.001). More than two thirds of restrictures were identified on the primary site. The incidence of late cholangitis was higher in group A (54%) than in group B (6%)(p=0.002). The late cholangitis was severe, recurrent and related to stones and strictures in 11 of the 15patients in group A. Twelve patients (ten in group A and two in group B) needed additional secondary multiple procedures at a median of 12 months after hepatectomy. These consisted of percutaneous fluoroscopic stone retrieval (n=6), postoperative cholangioscopy (POC) or percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopy (PTCS) with electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL)(n=3), balloon dilatation (n=7)choledochotomy (n=3), S4 segmentectomy (n=1), Sphincteroplasty (n=1), drainage of the delayed subphrenic or liver abscess (n=2), and repair of prolonged biliary fistula (n=1). The final outcomes after hepatectomy with or without secondary management were good in 80%, fair in 16%, and poor in 4% of the cases.
CONCLUSION
The majority of the recurrent cholangitis after hepatectomy in IHS were related to recurrent intrahepatic ductal strictures. Therefore, hepatic resection should be included the strictured duct. However, with hepatectomy alone, it is difficult to clean the IHS and relieve the ductal strictures completely, particularly in cases of bilateral IHS, so a perioperative team approaches, including both radiologic and cholangioscopic interventions, should be used for effective management of IHS.