Korean J Obstet Gynecol.  2004 Jul;47(7):1355-1362.

The Influence of Embryo Transfer Catheter on the Outcome of In Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
  • 2Institute of Reproductive Medicine and Population, Medical Research Center, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract


OBJECTIVE
To compare the efficacy of two different embryo transfer catheters, Norfolk and Wallace, in terms of the outcome of in vitro fertilization and embryo trabsfer (IVF-ET).
METHODS
One hundred and seventy-one IVF-ET cycles performed in 132 infertile couples were included in this retrospective study. The couples were subjected to two different embryo transfer catheter types: Norfolk catheter group (92 cycles) and Wallace catheter group (79 cycles). Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) was performed using step-down protocol with GnRH agonist or antagonist. Four or less embryos were transferred on day 2 or 3 after oocyte retrieval. The luteal phase was supported by intramuscular progesterone (Progest) or intravaginal 8% progesterone gel (Crinone).
RESULTS
The pregnancy rate per ET and the implantation rate were significantly higher in Wallace catheter group, respectively (20.7% vs. 34.2%, p=0.047; 9.7% vs. 15.1%, p=0.047). No statistically significant differences were observed in the other parameters between the two groups.
CONCLUSION
The Wallace catheter showed better IVF-ET outcomes when compared with the Norfolk catheter in our study. Further prospective randomized controlled studies in a larger scale will be necessary to confirm our findings.

Keyword

IVF-ET; Embryo transfer; Catheter; Pregnancy rate; Implantation rate

MeSH Terms

Catheters*
Embryo Transfer*
Embryonic Structures*
Family Characteristics
Female
Fertilization in Vitro*
Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone
Luteal Phase
Oocyte Retrieval
Pregnancy Rate
Progesterone
Retrospective Studies
Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone
Progesterone
Full Text Links
  • KJOG
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr