Korean J Pain.  2013 Oct;26(4):396-400. 10.3344/kjp.2013.26.4.396.

Computed Tomography (CT) Simulated Fluoroscopy-Guided Transdiscal Approach in Transcrural Celiac Plexus Block

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. paindrsuh@gmail.com

Abstract

Conventional transcrural CPB via the "walking off" the vertebra technique may injure vital organs while attempting to proximally spread injectate around the celiac plexus. Therefore, we attempted the CT-simulated fluoroscopy-guided transdiscal approach to carry out transcrural CPB in a safer manner, spreading the injectate more completely and closely within the celiac plexus area. A 54-year-old male patient with pancreatic cancer suffered from severe epigastric pain. The conventional transcrural approach was simulated, but the needle pathway was impeded by the kidney on the right side and by the aorta on the left side. After simulating the transdiscal pathway through the T11-12 intervertebral disc, we predetermined the optimal insertion point (3.6 cm from the midline), insertion angle (18 degrees), and advancement plane, as well as the proper depth. With the transdiscal approach, we successfully performed transcrural CPB within a narrow angle, and the bilateral approach was not necessary as we were able to achieve the bilateral spread of the injectate with the single approach.

Keyword

celiac plexus block; CT simulated fluoroscopy-guided; transcrural approach; transdiscal approach

MeSH Terms

Aorta
Celiac Plexus
Humans
Intervertebral Disc
Kidney
Male
Middle Aged
Needles
Pancreatic Neoplasms
Spine

Figure

  • Fig. 1 The axial image of abdominal CT at the level T12 showing the celiac trunk. (A) The lines drawn according to the conventional transcrural approach was impeded by kidney in right side and aorta in left side. (B) Right needle pathway via transdiscal in transcrural approach was drawn on the image at the level T12-L1 intervertebra disc. I: the right needle insertion point, S: midline of spinous process, IS: 3.6 cm, *The angle for needle insertion on the right.

  • Fig. 2 Fluoroscopic views of needle location and contrast flow. (A) On an anteroposterior view, the contrast spread across the midline. (b) On the lateral view, the needle penetrated disc, and its tip is located approximately 2/3 of AP diameter anterior to vertebra body.


Cited by  2 articles

Factors associated with successful response to neurolytic celiac plexus block in patients with upper abdominal cancer-related pain: a retrospective study
Hyun-Jung Kwon, Kyunghwan Jang, Jeong-Gil Leem, Jin-Woo Shin, Doo-Hwan Kim, Seong-Soo Choi
Korean J Pain. 2021;34(4):479-486.    doi: 10.3344/kjp.2021.34.4.479.

Splanchnic nerve neurolysis via the transdiscal approach under fluoroscopic guidance: a retrospective study
Zhenhua Cai, Xiaolin Zhou, Mengli Wang, Jiyu Kang, Mingshuo Zhang, Huacheng Zhou
Korean J Pain. 2022;35(2):202-208.    doi: 10.3344/kjp.2022.35.2.202.


Reference

1. Bahn BM, Erdek MA. Celiac plexus block and neurolysis for pancreatic cancer. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2013; 17:310. PMID: 23299904.
Article
2. Kim WH, Lee CJ, Sim WS, Shin BS, Ahn HJ, Lim HY. Anatomical analysis of computed tomography images for determining the optimal oblique fluoroscope angle for percutaneous coeliac plexus block. J Int Med Res. 2011; 39:1798–1807. PMID: 22117980.
Article
3. Moore DC, Bush WH, Burnett LL. Celiac plexus block: a roentgenographic, anatomic study of technique and spread of solution in patients and corpses. Anesth Analg. 1981; 60:369–379. PMID: 7195158.
4. Ischia S, Luzzani A, Ischia A, Faggion S. A new approach to the neurolytic block of the coeliac plexus: the transaortic technique. Pain. 1983; 16:333–341. PMID: 6194498.
Article
5. Ischia S, Ischia A, Polati E, Finco G. Three posterior percutaneous celiac plexus block techniques. A prospective, randomized study in 61 patients with pancreatic cancer pain. Anesthesiology. 1992; 76:534–540. PMID: 1550278.
Article
6. Garcia-Eroles X, Mayoral V, Montero A, Serra J, Porta J. Celiac plexus block: a new technique using the left lateral approach. Clin J Pain. 2007; 23:635–637. PMID: 17710015.
Article
7. De Cicco M, Matovic M, Bortolussi R, Coran F, Fantin D, Fabiani F, et al. Celiac plexus block: injectate spread and pain relief in patients with regional anatomic distortions. Anesthesiology. 2001; 94:561–565. PMID: 11379673.
8. Loukas M, Klaassen Z, Merbs W, Tubbs RS, Gielecki J, Zurada A. A review of the thoracic splanchnic nerves and celiac ganglia. Clin Anat. 2010; 23:512–522. PMID: 20235178.
Article
9. Hilgier M, Rykowski JJ. One needle transcrural celiac plexus block. Single shot or continuous technique, or both. Reg Anesth. 1994; 19:277–283. PMID: 7947429.
10. Noble M, Gress FG. Techniques and results of neurolysis for chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer pain. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2006; 8:99–103. PMID: 16533471.
Article
11. Yang IY, Oraee S, Viejo C, Stern H. Computed tomography celiac trunk topography relating to celiac plexus block. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2011; 36:21–25. PMID: 21455084.
Article
12. Yang IY, Oraee S. A modified approach to transcrural celiac plexus block. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2005; 30:303–307. PMID: 15898036.
Article
13. Flanagan MN, Chung BU. Roentgenographic changes in 188 patients 10-20 years after discography and chemonucleolysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1986; 11:444–448. PMID: 3750081.
Article
Full Text Links
  • KJP
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr