Yonsei Med J.  2014 May;55(3):584-591. 10.3349/ymj.2014.55.3.584.

Comparison of Full Lesion Coverage versus Spot Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation for Coronary Artery Stenoses

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Cardiology, Eulji General Hospital, Eulji University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 2Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Regional Cardiovascular Center, Wonkwang University Hospital, Iksan, Korea.
  • 3Department of Cardiology, Gil Hospital, Gachon University, Incheon, Korea. kangwch@gilhospital.com
  • 4Department of Cardiology, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. mkhong61@yuhs.ac
  • 5Severance Biomedical Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE
The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the long-term clinical outcomes of the spot drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation strategy, which is used to minimize implanted stent length and the number of stents, versus full lesion coverage for treatment of coronary artery stenoses.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We evaluated 1-year clinical outcomes of 1619 patients with stent implantation for a single coronary lesion. They were divided into two groups: those treated by full lesion coverage (n=1200) and those treated with the spot stenting strategy (n=419). The combined occurrence of 1-year target vessel failure (TVF), including cardiac death, target-vessel related myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization was evaluated.
RESULTS
The spot DES implantation group had a shorter stent length (23.14+/-9.70 mm vs. 25.44+/-13.24 mm, respectively; p<0.001) and a fewer number of stents (1.09+/-0.30 vs. 1.16+/-0.41, respectively; p<0.001), even though the average lesion length was similar to the full lesion coverage group (21.36+/-10.30 mm vs. 20.58+/-10.97 mm, respectively; p=0.206). Spot DES implantation was superior to full DES coverage with respect to 1-year TVF (1.4% vs. 3.3%, p=0.044). Cox proportional hazard model analysis showed that the risk for 1-year TVF was almost 60% lower among patients who received spot DESs compared to those who received full DES coverage after adjustment for other risk factors (HR=0.40, 95% confidence interval=0.17-0.98; p=0.046).
CONCLUSION
Minimizing stent length and the number of stents with overlapping by spot DES implantation may result in reduced rates of 1-year TVF, compared with full DES coverage.

Keyword

Drug-eluting stents; percutaneous coronary intervention; coronary artery disease

MeSH Terms

Aged
Coronary Stenosis/*surgery
*Drug-Eluting Stents
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/*methods

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Cumulative incidence of target vessel failure at 1 year. One year time-to-event curves are shown for target vessel failure in patients treated with full DES coverage versus spot DES implantation. Event rates represent Kaplan-Meier estimates. The p values are based on the log-rank test. CI, confidence interval; DES, drug-eluting stent.

  • Fig. 2 Subgroup analyses of the 1-year rates of target vessel failure. Subgroup analyses are shown for the target vessel failure at 1 year among subgroups of patients treated with full DES coverage versus spot DES implantation. The p value for interaction represents the likelihood of interaction between the variable and the relative treatment effect. CI, confidence interval; DES, drug-eluting stent; E-ZES, Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent; MI, myocardial infarction; MLD, minimal lumen diameter.


Reference

1. Tsagalou E, Chieffo A, Iakovou I, Ge L, Sangiorgi GM, Corvaja N, et al. Multiple overlapping drug-eluting stents to treat diffuse disease of the left anterior descending coronary artery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005; 45:1570–1573.
Article
2. Grube E, Dawkins KD, Guagliumi G, Banning AP, Zmudka K, Colombo A, et al. TAXUS VI 2-year follow-up: randomized comparison of polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting with bare metal stents for treatment of long, complex lesions. Eur Heart J. 2007; 28:2578–2582.
Article
3. Sakurai R, Ako J, Morino Y, Sonoda S, Kaneda H, Terashima M, et al. Predictors of edge stenosis following sirolimus-eluting stent deployment (a quantitative intravascular ultrasound analysis from the SIRIUS trial). Am J Cardiol. 2005; 96:1251–1253.
Article
4. Katritsis DG, Korovesis S, Tzanalaridou E, Giazitzoglou E, Voridis E, Meier B. Comparison of long versus short ("spot") drug-eluting stenting for long coronary stenoses. Am J Cardiol. 2009; 104:786–790.
Article
5. de la Torre-Hernández JM, Alfonso F, Hernández F, Elizaga J, Sanmartin M, Pinar E, et al. Drug-eluting stent thrombosis: results from the multicenter Spanish registry ESTROFA (Estudio ESpañol sobre TROmbosis de stents FArmacoactivos). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008; 51:986–990.
6. Suh J, Park DW, Lee JY, Jung IH, Lee SW, Kim YH, et al. The relationship and threshold of stent length with regard to risk of stent thrombosis after drug-eluting stent implantation. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010; 3:383–389.
Article
7. Caputo RP, Goel A, Pencina M, Cohen DJ, Kleiman NS, Yen CH, et al. Impact of drug eluting stent length on outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (from the EVENT registry). Am J Cardiol. 2012; 110:350–355.
Article
8. Colombo A, De Gregorio J, Moussa I, Kobayashi Y, Karvouni E, Di Mario C, et al. Intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty with provisional spot stenting for treatment of long coronary lesions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001; 38:1427–1433.
Article
9. Kim BK, Hong MK, Shin DH, Nam CM, Kim JS, Ko YG, et al. A new strategy for discontinuation of dual antiplatelet therapy: the RESET Trial (REal Safety and Efficacy of 3-month dual antiplatelet Therapy following Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent implantation). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012; 60:1340–1348.
10. Cutlip DE, Windecker S, Mehran R, Boam A, Cohen DJ, van Es GA, et al. Clinical end points in coronary stent trials: a case for standardized definitions. Circulation. 2007; 115:2344–2351.
11. Kobayashi Y, De Gregorio J, Kobayashi N, Akiyama T, Reimers B, Finci L, et al. Stented segment length as an independent predictor of restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999; 34:651–659.
Article
12. Kastrati A, Elezi S, Dirschinger J, Hadamitzky M, Neumann FJ, Schömig A. Influence of lesion length on restenosis after coronary stent placement. Am J Cardiol. 1999; 83:1617–1622.
Article
13. Dietz U, Holz N, Dauer C, Lambertz H. Shortening the stent length reduces restenosis with bare metal stents: matched pair comparison of short stenting and conventional stenting. Heart. 2006; 92:80–84.
Article
14. Schampaert E, Cohen EA, Schlüter M, Reeves F, Traboulsi M, Title LM, et al. The Canadian study of the sirolimus-eluting stent in the treatment of patients with long de novo lesions in small native coronary arteries (C-SIRIUS). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004; 43:1110–1115.
Article
15. Schofer J, Schlüter M, Gershlick AH, Wijns W, Garcia E, Schampaert E, et al. Sirolimus-eluting stents for treatment of patients with long atherosclerotic lesions in small coronary arteries: double-blind, randomised controlled trial (E-SIRIUS). Lancet. 2003; 362:1093–1099.
Article
16. Abbott JD, Voss MR, Nakamura M, Cohen HA, Selzer F, Kip KE, et al. Unrestricted use of drug-eluting stents compared with bare-metal stents in routine clinical practice: findings from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Dynamic Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007; 50:2029–2036.
Article
17. Williams DO, Abbott JD, Kip KE. DEScover Investigators. Outcomes of 6906 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in the era of drug-eluting stents: report of the DEScover Registry. Circulation. 2006; 114:2154–2162.
Article
18. Liu J, Maehara A, Mintz GS, Weissman NJ, Yu A, Wang H, et al. An integrated TAXUS IV, V, and VI intravascular ultrasound analysis of the predictors of edge restenosis after bare metal or paclitaxel-eluting stents. Am J Cardiol. 2009; 103:501–506.
Article
19. Costa JR Jr, Sousa A, Moreira AC, Costa RA, Cano M, Maldonado G, et al. Incidence and predictors of very late (>or=4 years) major cardiac adverse events in the DESIRE (Drug-Eluting Stents in the Real World)-Late registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010; 3:12–18.
Article
20. Räber L, Jüni P, Löffel L, Wandel S, Cook S, Wenaweser P, et al. Impact of stent overlap on angiographic and long-term clinical outcome in patients undergoing drug-eluting stent implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010; 55:1178–1188.
Article
21. Boden WE, O'Rourke RA, Teo KK, Hartigan PM, Maron DJ, Kostuk WJ, et al. Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2007; 356:1503–1516.
Article
22. Bech GJ, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, de Muinck ED, Hoorntje JC, Escaned J, et al. Fractional flow reserve to determine the appropriateness of angioplasty in moderate coronary stenosis: a randomized trial. Circulation. 2001; 103:2928–2934.
Article
23. Park CB, Hong MK, Kim YH, Park DW, Han KH, Lee CW, et al. Comparison of angiographic patterns of in-stent restenosis between sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stent. Int J Cardiol. 2007; 120:387–390.
Article
Full Text Links
  • YMJ
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr