KoreaMed, a service of the Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors (KAMJE), provides access to articles published in Korean medical, dental, nursing, nutrition and veterinary journals. KoreaMed records include links to full-text content in Synapse and publisher web sites.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the results of vertebroplasty and conservative treatment in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients were divided randomly into 2 groups; Group I (conservative treatment) and Group II (vertebroplasty).
There are 14 cases in group I and 16 cases in group II. Radiologically, the progression of compression was observed.
Clinical evaluation was done using Denis pain scale. In both groups, prolonged pain with nonunion or avascular necrosis that
resulted in surgical intervention was evaluated as complication. In group II, the complication associated the procedures were
evaluated. RESULTS Group II was superior to conservative treatment in terms of maintaining vertebral height radiologically. The characteristics
of symptom improvement were the same in two groups. There were cement leakage among group II but they did not
influence to the results. In group I, 2 subjects needed surgery due to prolonged pain. In group II, 1 subject needed surgery
due to prolonged pain and there were 3 cement leakage cases which were insignificant. CONCLUSION In vertebroplasty group, complications associated the procedures were noted. In conservative treatment group,
more patients needed operation. Therefore, we should be very prudent when we choose the treatment of the osteoporotic
vertebral compression fracture.