J Korean Assoc Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg.  2013 Mar;35(2):82-87.

Three Dimensional Study on the Postoperative Stability after Advancement of Maxilla Using Le Fort I Osteotomy

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University, Korea. omskook@jnu.ac.kr

Abstract

PURPOSE
This study evaluated postoperative maxillary stabilities in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion who were taken both maxillary advancement surgery and mandibular retrusive surgery, using Le Fort I osteotomy, through three-dimensional computed tomography.
METHODS
We selected 14 patients who were taken postoperative three-dimensional computerized tomography at the time before surgery, immediately after surgery, six months after surgery among the patients undergone both maxillary advancement surgery using Le Fort I osteotomy and mandibular retrusive surgery using bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy. We measured and compared the vertical distance of A-point and posterior nasal spine (PNS), the horizontal distance of A-point and PNS in transverse plane and coronal plane of the three-dimensional reconstructed images, respectively.
RESULTS
In transverse plane, the distance difference between immediately after surgery (S1) and immediately before surgery (S0) of A-point was -0.04+/-1.80 mm, S2 and S0 was -0.15+/-1.69 mm, and between S1 and S2 was 0.11+/-0.58 mm. There were no significant differences between these data (P>0.05). In transverse plane, the distance between S1-S0 of PNS was -3.87+/-2.37 mm, S2-S0 of PNS was -3.79+/-2.39 mm, and S1-S2 of PNS was -0.08+/-0.18 mm. There were significant differences between these data (P<0.05). In coronal plane, the distance between S1-S0 of A-point was 3.99+/-0.86 mm, S2-S0 was 3.57+/-1.09 mm, and S1-S2 was 0.42+/-0.42 mm. There were significant differences between these data (P<0.05). In coronal plane, the distance between S1-S0 of PNS was 3.82+/-0.96 mm, S2-S0 was 3.43+/-0.91 mm, and S1-S2 was 0.39+/-0.49 mm. There were significant differences between these data (P<0.05). In transverse plane, it was estimated that PNS has no statistical postoperative stability in the same direction. In coronal plane, it was estimated that both A-point and PNS had no statistical postoperative stability (P<0.05).
CONCLUSION
Clinically, the operation plan needs to take into account of the maxillary relapse.

Keyword

Le Fort I osteotomy; Three dimensional computed tomography; Maxillary relapse; Postoperative stability

MeSH Terms

Humans
Malocclusion
Maxilla
Osteotomy
Osteotomy, Sagittal Split Ramus
Recurrence
Spine
Full Text Links
  • JKAMPRS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr