Ann Surg Treat Res.  2015 Jul;89(1):30-36. 10.4174/astr.2015.89.1.30.

Outcomes of retrievable inferior vena cava filters in patients with deep vein thrombosis and transient contraindication for anticoagulation

Affiliations
  • 1Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea. shuh@knu.ac.kr
  • 2Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
  • 3Department of Radiology, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE
To determine the efficacy of a retrievable inferior vena cava filter (IVCF) for patients with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and transient contraindication for anticoagulant therapy, and to analyze the risk factors for filter thrombus in these patients.
METHODS
We retrospectively reviewed the records of 70 patients who received a retrievable IVCF from January 2007 to June 2014 because of documented DVT and transient contraindication for anticoagulant therapy. The protocol for follow-up care generally consisted of anticoagulant therapy after high-risk periods, follow-up CT around 2 weeks after IVCF placement, and retrieval if possible.
RESULTS
The 70 patients had a mean age of 61.8 years (range, 17-88 years), and 30 were male (43%). The indications for IVCF were recent trauma including surgery in 48 patients, recent hemorrhage in 14, and planned major surgery with DVT in 8 patients. Follow-up CT of 61 patients (87%) was performed. Aggravation or new development of pulmonary embolism (PE) was not found in any patient. Filter thrombus was detected in 23% of patients with follow-up CT (14/61). Filter thrombus was not detected in patients with isolated calf vein thrombosis (ICVT) (P = 0.079). The risk factor for filter thrombus was DVT progression on follow-up CT (P = 0.007) on multivariate analysis.
CONCLUSION
For patients with DVT and transient contraindication for anticoagulant therapy, a retrievable IVCF could prevent the aggravation or new development of PE. DVT progression on follow-up CT was associated with filter thrombus and ICVT was not related to filter thrombus in the present study.

Keyword

Deep vein thrombosis; Pulmonary embolism; Vena cava filters

MeSH Terms

Follow-Up Studies
Hemorrhage
Humans
Male
Multivariate Analysis
Pulmonary Embolism
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Thrombosis
Veins
Vena Cava Filters*
Venous Thrombosis*

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Examples of filter thrombus on follow-up CT. (A) Image from a 57-year-old man with a pelvic bone fracture and femoropopliteal deep vein thrombosis who had a Celect filter inserted preoperatively. After 14 days, follow-up CT scan showed filter thrombus within inferior vena cava filter (arrow). (B) Image from a 51-year-old woman with cerebral hemorrhage and popliteal vein thrombosis who received a Celect filter inserted for prevention of further pulmonary embolism. After 11 days, follow-up CT scan showed filter thrombus with total thrombotic occlusion of inferior vena cava filter distal to the filter (arrow).

  • Fig. 2 Flow chart of IVC filters in patients with DVT and transient contraindication for anticoagulation. IVC, inferior vena cava; DVT, deep vein thrombosis.


Reference

1. Anderson FA Jr, Wheeler HB, Goldberg RJ, Hosmer DW, Patwardhan NA, Jovanovic B, et al. A population-based perspective of the hospital incidence and case-fatality rates of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. The Worcester DVT Study. Arch Intern Med. 1991; 151:933–938.
2. Mobin-Uddin K, McLean R, Bolooki H, Jude JR. Caval interruption for prevention of pulmonary embolism. Long-term results of a new method. Arch Surg. 1969; 99:711–715.
3. PREPIC Study Group. Eight-year follow-up of patients with permanent vena cava filters in the prevention of pulmonary embolism: the PREPIC (Prevention du Risque d'Embolie Pulmonaire par Interruption Cave) randomized study. Circulation. 2005; 112:416–422.
4. Malgor RD, Labropoulos N. A systematic review of symptomatic duodenal perforation by inferior vena cava filters. J Vasc Surg. 2012; 55:856–861.e3.
5. Sella DM, Oldenburg WA. Complications of inferior vena cava filters. Semin Vasc Surg. 2013; 26:23–28.
6. Zhou D, Moon E, Bullen J, Sands M, Levitin A, Wang W. Penetration of Celect inferior vena cava filters: retrospective review of CT scans in 265 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014; 202:643–647.
7. Kearon C, Akl EA, Comerota AJ, Prandoni P, Bounameaux H, Goldhaber SZ, et al. Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest. 2012; 141:2 Suppl. e419S–e494S.
8. Kaufman JA, Kinney TB, Streiff MB, Sing RF, Proctor MC, Becker D, et al. Guidelines for the use of retrievable and convertible vena cava filters: report from the Society of Interventional Radiology multidisciplinary consensus conference. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2006; 17:449–459.
9. Rogers FB, Cipolle MD, Velmahos G, Rozycki G, Luchette FA. Practice management guidelines for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in trauma patients: the EAST practice management guidelines work group. J Trauma. 2002; 53:142–164.
10. Angel LF, Tapson V, Galgon RE, Restrepo MI, Kaufman J. Systematic review of the use of retrievable inferior vena cava filters. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2011; 22:1522–1530.e3.
11. Teo TK, Angle JF, Shipp JI, Bluett MK, Gilliland CA, Turba UC, et al. Incidence and management of inferior vena cava filter thrombus detected at time of filter retrieval. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2011; 22:1514–1520.
12. Loud PA, Katz DS, Bruce DA, Klippenstein DL, Grossman ZD. Deep venous thrombosis with suspected pulmonary embolism: detection with combined CT venography and pulmonary angiography. Radiology. 2001; 219:498–502.
13. Kakkar VV, Corrigan TP, Fossard DP, Sutherland I, Thirwell J. Prevention of fatal postoperative pulmonary embolism by low doses of heparin: reappraisal of results of international multicentre trial. Lancet. 1977; 1:567–569.
14. Smouse B, Johar A. Is market growth of vena cava filters justified? A review of indications, use, and market analysis. Endovasc Today. 2010; 2:74–77.
15. Decousus H, Leizorovicz A, Parent F, Page Y, Tardy B, Girard P, et al. A clinical trial of vena caval filters in the prevention of pulmonary embolism in patients with proximal deep-vein thrombosis. Prevention du Risque d'Embolie Pulmonaire par Interruption Cave Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1998; 338:409–415.
16. Wicky S, Doenz F, Meuwly JY, Portier F, Schnyder P, Denys A. Clinical experience with retrievable Gunther Tulip vena cava filters. J Endovasc Ther. 2003; 10:994–1000.
17. Millward SF, Oliva VL, Bell SD, Valenti DA, Rasuli P, Asch M, et al. Günther Tulip Retrievable Vena Cava Filter: results from the Registry of the Canadian Interventional Radiology Association. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2001; 12:1053–1058.
18. Lagerstedt CI, Olsson CG, Fagher BO, Oqvist BW, Albrechtsson U. Need for long-term anticoagulant treatment in symptomatic calf-vein thrombosis. Lancet. 1985; 2:515–518.
19. Kearon C, Julian JA, Newman TE, Ginsberg JS. Noninvasive diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis. McMaster Diagnostic Imaging Practice Guidelines Initiative. Ann Intern Med. 1998; 128:663–677.
20. Thomas SM, Goodacre SW, Sampson FC, van Beek EJ. Diagnostic value of CT for deep vein thrombosis: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Radiol. 2008; 63:299–304.
21. Yun WS, Lee KK, Cho J, Kim HK, Kyung HS, Huh S. Early treatment outcome of isolated calf vein thrombosis after total knee arthroplasty. J Korean Surg Soc. 2012; 82:374–379.
22. Caplin DM, Nikolic B, Kalva SP, Ganguli S, Saad WE, Zuckerman DA, et al. Quality improvement guidelines for the performance of inferior vena cava filter placement for the prevention of pulmonary embolism. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2011; 22:1499–1506.
23. Rogers NA, Nguyen L, Minniefield NE, Jessen ME, de Lemos JA. Fracture and embolization of an inferior vena cava filter strut leading to cardiac tamponade. Circulation. 2009; 119:2535–2536.
24. Tam MD, Spain J, Lieber M, Geisinger M, Sands MJ, Wang W. Fracture and distant migration of the Bard Recovery filter: a retrospective review of 363 implantations for potentially life-threatening complications. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2012; 23:199–205.e1.
Full Text Links
  • ASTR
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2025 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr