J Korean Surg Soc.  1998 Aug;55(2):274-281.

Treatment of Arteriovenous Fistula Failure: Surgical Revision Versus Interventional Radiologic Procedure A prospective randomized study on secondary angioaccess procedure

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Vascular Surgery, Ulsan University, College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
  • 2Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Ulsan University, College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
  • 3Department of Internal Medicine, Ulsan University, College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

There are over 10,000 individuals in Korea who require chronic hemodialysis treatment. Vascular access with an adequate blood flow and good long-term patency are important to have adequate dialysis. Thrombosis is the most common cause of angioaccess failure and is usually due to outflow stenosis. A thrombolysis using urokinase has been used frequently in recent years for treatment of a thrombosis, but its efficacy is not well documented in the literature. The authors report a prospective randomized study comparing a surgical revision versus a thrombolysis with and without luminal balloon angioplasty. The long-term patency and the total cost of treatment to the patient were compared.

Keyword

Angioaccess failure; Surgical revision; Thrombolysis with or without luminal balloon angioplasty

MeSH Terms

Angioplasty, Balloon
Arteriovenous Fistula*
Constriction, Pathologic
Dialysis
Humans
Korea
Phenobarbital
Prospective Studies*
Renal Dialysis
Reoperation*
Thrombosis
Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator
Phenobarbital
Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator
Full Text Links
  • JKSS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr