J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg.  2014 Oct;40(5):205-205. 10.5125/jkaoms.2014.40.5.205.

Surgical treatment planning for the two subtypes of mandibular asymmetry

• Jeon JH

• KMID: 2005448
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2014.40.5.205

Abstract

No abstract available.

Reference

1. Wolford LM, Hilliard FW, Dugan DJ. Surgical treatment objective. St. Louis, Toronto, Princeton: The CV Mosby;1985.

2. Ellis E 3rd. A method to passively align the sagittal ramus osteotomy segments. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007; 65:2125–2130. PMID: 17884553.

3. Yoshida K, Rivera RS, Kaneko M, Kurita K. Minimizing displacement of the proximal segment after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy in asymmetric cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001; 59:15–18. PMID: 11152184.

4. Schwartz HC. Efficient surgical management of mandibular asymmetry. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011; 69:645–654. PMID: 20934795.

5. Sekiya T, Nakamura Y, Oikawa T, Ishii H, Hirashita A, Seto K. Elimination of transverse dental compensation is critical for treatment of patients with severe facial asymmetry. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010; 137:552–562. PMID: 20362918.

6. Jeon JH, Ha BG. Presurgical transverse dental decompensation in facial asymmetry patients. Recent Adv Orthod Orthognath Surg. 2012; 1:27–34.