Clinical Consideration of Choledocholithiasis Treatment: Analysis of Primary Closure versus T-tube Drainage after Choledochotomy

Chung, Gum Oh; Kwon, Jung Nam; Pack, Dong Eun; So, Byung Sun; Chae, Kwon Mook

Abstract

PURPOSE
The placement of a drainage tube in the common bile duct, following a choledochotomy, has become accepted as routine procedure since it was first reported, by Abbe, in 1892. However, many complications are associated with T-tube drainage, such as bile peritonitis after its removal, accidental dislodgement, bile leakage from the T-tube track and a high incidence of postoperative bacteremia, have been reported. This study was designed to evaluate the primary closure as a suitable surgical technique in placce of T-tube drainage following a choledochotomy METHODS: Between January and December 2002, primary closures were performed in 41 cases and T tube drainage in 112, following a choledochotomy. These cases were divided into 2 groups (group A: primary closure, and group B: T-tube drainage). The medical records of the patients were reviewed, and the following data analysed -age, sex, preoperative laboratory value, intraoperative finding, postoperative laboratory value, complication, and days of postoperative hospital stay. RESULTS: There were no significant differences observed in the data of the investigated parameters, with the exception of the mean post-operative hospital stay. The mean post- operative hospital stays were 11.82 and 18.08 days in groups A and B (P=0.0034), respectively. The complication rates of each group showed no statistical difference. However bile peritonitis or bile leakage after T-tube removal developed 5 cases from group B. There were 2 and 5 deaths due to MODS & ARDS, respectively. CONCLUSION: A primary closure, following a choledochotomy, may be a suitable alternative technique to T-tube drainage under reasonable conditions.