J Korean Acad Prosthodont.  2006 Dec;44(6):683-689.

Influence of investment/ceramic interaction layer on interfacial toughness of body ceramic bonded to lithia-based ceramic

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Prosthodontics, School Of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University 664-14 Dukjin Dong, Dukjin-Gu, Jeonju, Korea. jmpark@chonbuk.ac.kr

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Interfacial toughness is important in the mechanical property of layered dental ceramics such as core-veneered all-ceramic dental materials. The interfaces between adjacent layers must be strongly bonded to prevent delamination, however the weak interface makes delamination by the growth of lateral cracks along the interface. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of the reaction layer on the interfacial fracture toughness of the core/veneer structure according to the five different divesting.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Thirty five heat-pressed Lithia-based ceramic core bars (IPS Empress 2), 20 mm x 3 mm x 2 mm were made following the five different surface divesting conditions. G1 was no dissolution or sandblasting of the interaction layer. G2 and G3 were dissolved layer with 0.2% HF in an ultrasonic unit for 15min and 30 min. G4 and G5 were dissolved layer for 15min and 30min and then same sandblasting for 60s each. We veneered bilayered ceramic bars, 20 mm x 2.8 mm x 3.8 mm (2 mm core and 1.8 mm veneer), according to the manufacturer's instruction. After polishing the specimens through 1 micro m alumina, we induced five cracks for each of five groups within the veneer close to interface under an applied indenter load of 19.6N with a Vickers microhardness indenter.
RESULTS
The results from Vickers hardness were the percentage of delamination G1: 55%, G2: 50%, G3: 35%, G4: 0% and G5: 0%. SEM examination showed that the mean thickness of the reaction layer were G1 93.5+/-20.6 micrometer, G2 69.9+/-14.3 micrometer, G3 59.2+/-20.2 micrometer, G4 0.61+/-1.44 micrometer G5 0+/-0 micrometer. The mean interfacial delamination crack lengths were G1 131+/-54.5 micrometer, G2 85.2+/-51.3 micrometer, and G3 94.9+/-81.8 micrometer. One-way ANOVA showed that there was no statistically significant difference in interfacial crack length among G1, G2 and G3(p>0.05).
CONCLUSION
The investment reaction layer played important role at the interfacial toughness of body ceramic bonded to Lithia-based ceramic.

Keyword

Interfacial fracture toughness; Delamination; Bilayered ceramic; Reaction layer; Investment

MeSH Terms

Aluminum Oxide
Ceramics*
Dental Materials
Hardness
Investments
Ultrasonics
Aluminum Oxide
Ceramics
Dental Materials
Full Text Links
  • JKAP
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr