Korean J Urol.  2012 Dec;53(12):853-859. 10.4111/kju.2012.53.12.853.

Usefulness of Early Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Colic Patients with Ureteral Stones

• Choi HJ
• Jung JH
• Bae J
• Cho MC
• Lee HW
• Lee KS

• KMID: 1988731
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4111/kju.2012.53.12.853

Abstract

PURPOSE
To compare efficacy and safety between early extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (eESWL) and deferred ESWL (dESWL) in colic patients with ureteral stones and to investigate whether eESWL can play a critical role in improving treatment outcomes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A total of 279 patients who underwent ESWL for single radio-opaque ureteral stones of 5 to 20 mm in size were included in this retrospective study. The patients were categorized into two groups according to the time between the onset of colic and ESWL: eESWL (<48 hours, n=153) and dESWL (> or =48 hours, n=126). Success was defined as stone-free status as shown on a plain radiograph within 1 month of the first session.
RESULTS
For all patients, the success rate in the eESWL group was significantly higher than that in the dESWL group. The eESWL group required significantly fewer ESWL sessions and less time to achieve stone-free status than did the dESWL group. For 241 patients with stones <10 mm, all treatment outcomes in the former group were superior to those in the latter group, but not for 38 patients with stones sized 10 to 20 mm. The superiority of eESWL over dESWL in the treatment outcomes was more pronounced for proximal ureteral stones than for mid-to-distal ureteral stones. Post-ESWL complication rates were comparable between the two groups. In the multivariate analysis, smaller stone size and a time to ESWL of <48 hours were independent predictors of success.
CONCLUSIONS
Our data suggest that eESWL in colic patients with ureteral stones is an effective and safe treatment with accelerated stone clearance.

Keyword

Colic; Lithotripsy; Ureteral calculi

MeSH Terms

Colic
Humans
Lithotripsy
Multivariate Analysis
Retrospective Studies
Shock
Ureter
Ureteral Calculi

Reference

1. Preminger GM, Tiselius HG, Assimos DG, Alken P, Buck C, Gallucci M, et al. 2007 guideline for the management of ureteral calculi. J Urol. 2007. 178:2418–2434.

2. Seitz C, Fajkovic H, Remzi M, Waldert M, Ozsoy M, Kramer G, et al. Rapid extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy treatment after a first colic episode correlates with accelerated ureteral stone clearance. Eur Urol. 2006. 49:1099–1105.

3. Ghalayini IF, Al-Ghazo MA, Khader YS. Evaluation of emergency extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for obstructing ureteral stones. Int Braz J Urol. 2008. 34:433–440.

4. Dasgupta R, Hegarty N, Thomas K. Emergency shock wave lithotripsy for ureteric stones. Curr Opin Urol. 2009. 19:196–199.

5. Kumar A, Mohanty NK, Jain M, Prakash S, Arora RP. A prospective randomized comparison between early (<48 hours of onset of colicky pain) versus delayed shockwave lithotripsy for symptomatic upper ureteral calculi: a single center experience. J Endourol. 2010. 24:2059–2066.

6. Seitz C, Tanovic E, Kikic Z, Memarsadeghi M, Fajkovic H. Rapid extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for proximal ureteral calculi in colic versus noncolic patients. Eur Urol. 2007. 52:1223–1227.

7. Tombal B, Mawlawi H, Feyaerts A, Wese FX, Opsomer R, Van Cangh PJ. Prospective randomized evaluation of emergency extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) on the short-time outcome of symptomatic ureteral stones. Eur Urol. 2005. 47:855–859.

8. Tligui M, El Khadime MR, Tchala K, Haab F, Traxer O, Gattegno B, et al. Emergency extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for obstructing ureteral stones. Eur Urol. 2003. 43:552–555.

9. Picozzi SC, Ricci C, Gaeta M, Casellato S, Stubinski R, Ratti D, et al. Urgent shock wave lithotripsy as first-line treatment for ureteral stones: a meta-analysis of 570 patients. Urol Res. 2012. 40:725–731.

10. Al-Nakshabandi NA. The soft-tissue rim sign. Radiology. 2003. 229:239–240.

11. Pareek G, Hedican SP, Lee FT Jr, Nakada SY. Shock wave lithotripsy success determined by skin-to-stone distance on computed tomography. Urology. 2005. 66:941–944.

12. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004. 240:205–213.

13. Mueller SC, Wilbert D, Thueroff JW, Alken P. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of ureteral stones: clinical experience and experimental findings. J Urol. 1986. 135:831–834.

14. Kim HL, Labay PC, Boyarsky S, Glenn JF. An experimental model of ureteral colic. J Urol. 1970. 104:390–394.

15. Cummings JM, Boullier JA, Izenberg SD, Kitchens DM, Kothandapani RV. Prediction of spontaneous ureteral calculous passage by an artificial neural network. J Urol. 2000. 164:326–328.

16. Kravchick S, Bunkin I, Stepnov E, Peled R, Agulansky L, Cytron S. Emergency extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for acute renal colic caused by upper urinary-tract stones. J Endourol. 2005. 19:1–4.