J Korean Acad Conserv Dent.  2002 Mar;27(2):196-206. 10.5395/JKACD.2002.27.2.196.

Shaping ability of Ni-Ti rotary files in combination with GT rotary Ni-Ti file

• Shin DR
• Park SJ
• Choi GW

• KMID: 1987278
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2002.27.2.196

Abstract

No abstract available.

MeSH Terms

Nickel
Titanium
Nickel
Titanium

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1 Composite image of the simulated root canal with apical zip and elbow in the ProFile .04 taper instrument.

• 

  Fig. 2 Composite image of the simulated root canal with ledge in the HERO 642 instrument.

• 

  Fig. 3 Composite image of the simulated root canal in the ProFile .04, Lightspeed, HERO 642 instruments.

Reference

1. Shilder H. Cleaning and shaping of the root canal. Dent Clin North Am. 1974. 18:269–296.

2. Eldeeb ME, Boraas JC. The effect of different files on the preparation shape of severely curved canal. Int Endod J. 1995. 18:1–7.

3. Al-Omari MAO, Dummer PMH. Comparison of six files to prepare simulated root canals Part 1. Int Endod J. 1992. 25:57–66.

4. Al-Omari MAO, Dummer PMH. Comparison of six files to prepare simulated root canals. Part 2. Int Endod J. 1992. 25:67–81.

5. Schafer E, Tepel J, Hoppe W. Properties of endodontic hand instruments used in rotary motion. Part 2. Instrumentation of curved canals. J Endod. 1995. 21:493–497.

6. Walia H, Brantley WA, Gerstein H. An initial investigation of the bending and torsional properties of Nitinol root canal files. J Endod. 1988. 14:346–351.

7. Himel VT, Ahmed KM, Wood DM, Alhadainy HA. An evaluation Nitinol and stainless steel files used by dental students during a laboratory proficiency exam. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1995. 79:232–237.

8. Espisito PT, Cunningham CJ. A comparison of canal preparation with nickel-titanium and stainless steel instruments. J Endod. 1995. 21:173–176.

9. Glosson CR, Haller RH, Dove SB, del Rio CE. A comparison of root canal preparation using Ni-Ti hand, Ni-Ti engine-driven and K-Flex endodontic instruments. J Endod. 1995. 21:146–151.

10. Clifford J. Cleaning and shaping the root canal system, Pathways of the pulp. 2000. 7th edn. St Louis. MO. USA: The CV Mosby Company;253.

11. Blum JY, Cohen AG, Machtou P, Micallef JP. Location of contact areas of ProFile NiTi rotary instruments in relation to the forces developed during mechanical preparation of extracted teeth. Int Endod J. 1999. 32(2):108–114.

12. Miserendino LJ, Moser JB, Heuer MA, Osetek EM. Cutting efficiency of endodontic instruments. II. Analysis of tip design. J Endod. 1986. 12(1):8–12.

13. Wildey WL, Senia ES. A new root canal instrument and instrumentation technique: a preliminary report. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1989. 67:198–207.

14. Wildey WL, Senia ES, Montgomery S. Another look at root canal instrumentation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1992. 74:499–507.

15. Knowles KI, Ibarrola JL, Christiansen RK. Assessing apical deformation and transportation following the use of Lightspeed root canal instruments. Int Endod J. 1996. 29:113–117.

16. Vulcain JM, Calas P. The three wave concept of HERO 642. Endod Prac. 1999. 2(2):20–24. 2628–31.

17. Abou-Rass M, Jastrab RJ. The use of rotary instruments as auxiliary aids to root canal preparation of molars. J Endod. 1982. 8:78–82.

18. Kum KY, Spangberg L, Cha BY, et al. Shaping ability of three ProFile rotary instrumentation techniques in the simulated resin root canals. J Endod. 2000. 12:719–723.

19. Kanavagh D, Lumley PJ. An in vitro evaluation of canal preparation using ProFile 0.4 and 0.6 taper series instruments. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1998. 14:16–24.

20. Lim SS, Webber J. The validity of simulated root canals for the investigation of the prepared root canal shape. Int Endod J. 1985. 18:240–246.

21. Thompson SA, Dummer PMH. Shaping ability of ProFile .04 taper series 29 rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals. Part 1. Int Endod J. 1997. 30:1–7.

22. Thompson SA, Dummer PMH. Shaping ability of ProFile .04 taper series 29 rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals. Part 2. Int Endod J. 1997. 30:8–15.

23. Thompson SA, Dummer PMH. Shaping ability of Lightspeed rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals Part 1. J Endod. 1997. 23:698–702.

24. Thompson SA, Dummer PMH. Shaping ability of Lightspeed rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals. Part 2. J Endod. 1997. 23:742–747.

25. Thompson SA, Dummer PMH. Shaping ability of HERO 642 rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals. Part 1. Int Endod J. 2000. 33:248–254.

26. Thompson SA, Dummer PMH. Shaping ability of HERO 642 rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals. Part 2. Int Endod J. 2000. 33:255–261.