Korean J Crit Care Med.  1997 Jun;12(1):43-48.

Differences of Incidence and Severity of Sore Throat and Hoarseness between the Methods of Airway Security

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Anesthesiology, Inchon Christian Hospital, Inchon, Korea.

Abstract

Introduction
The sore throat and hoarseness are common complications during the postoperative period. We investigated differences of incidence and severity of sore throat and hoarseness according to methods of airway security.
METHODS
One hundred twelve patients, in ASA physical status class 1~2, were included in this study (58 males and 54 females). They were divided into three groups: group 1 (n=42), intubated with endotracheal tube lubricated with normal saline; group 2 (n=40), intubated with endotracheal tube lubricated with 5% lidocaine ointment; group 3 (n=30), inserted with laryngeal mask airway (LMA) for airway security.
RESULTS
The incidence of sore throat and hoarseness were 78.6% and 54.8% in group 1, 35% and 30% in group 2, and 33.3% and 20.0% in group 3.
CONCLUSIONS
Both 5% lidocaine-lubricated endotracheal tube and laryngeal mask airway showed tendency of decreased incidence of postoperative sore throat and hoarseness but there are no statistical significance.

Keyword

Equipment: endotracheal tube; Equipment: laryngeal mask airway; Complication: sore throat; Complication: hoarseness

MeSH Terms

Hoarseness*
Humans
Incidence*
Laryngeal Masks
Lidocaine
Male
Pharyngitis*
Postoperative Period
Lidocaine
Full Text Links
  • KJCCM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr