J Korean Med Assoc.  2009 Sep;52(9):880-885. 10.5124/jkma.2009.52.9.880.

Hospice-Palliative Care and Social Strategies for Improvement of the Quality of End-of-Life

Affiliations
  • 1Cancer Management Branch, Research Institute of National Cancer Center, Korea. lawyun08@ncc.re.kr

Abstract

Despite of various efforts for high quality care at the end-of -life (EOL), there are still gaps between hope and reality of patients with terminal illness and their caregivers. Together with establishment of hospice-palliative care, we need to make strategies to reduce burden and suffering among the patients and their family members, such as social consensus on ideal dying, practice guideline for care of a dying patient, comprehensive governmental plan for EOL care, and the enactments of necessary laws. These efforts would make people accept the process of dying as a completion of life.

Keyword

End-of-life; Hospice-Palliative care; Qualify care

MeSH Terms

Caregivers
Consensus
Humans
Jurisprudence
Stress, Psychological

Figure

  • Figure 1 Change of attitude about end-of-life decision maker according to socioeconomic burden (adapted from reference 5)


Cited by  3 articles

Court decisions on withdrawal of life sustaining treatment and related problems associated with legalization
Jang Han Kim
J Korean Med Assoc. 2012;55(12):1178-1187.    doi: 10.5124/jkma.2012.55.12.1178.

Court decisions on withdrawal of life sustaining treatment and related problems associated with legalization
Jang Han Kim
J Korean Med Assoc. 2012;55(12):1178-1187.    doi: 10.5124/jkma.2012.55.12.1178.

Text Network Analysis of Newspaper Articles on Life-sustaining Treatments
Eun-Jun Park, Dae Woong Ahn, Chan Sook Park
J Korean Acad Community Health Nurs. 2018;29(2):244-256.    doi: 10.12799/jkachn.2018.29.2.244.


Reference

1. Korea National Statistical Office. Annual report on the cause of death statistics, 2007.
2. Facts On Dying: Policy relevant data on care at the end of life. Brown University. August 10th, 2009. http://www.chcr.brown.edu/dying/SLIDESHOW.HTM.
3. Yun YH, Rhee YS, Nam SY, Chae YM, Heo DS, Lee SW, Hong YS, Kim SY, Lee KS. Public attitudes toward dying with dignity and hospice palliative care. J Hospice & Palliat Med. 2004. 7:17–28.
4. Yun YH, Rhee YS, Nam SY, Park SM, Lee JS, Park MH, Choe WSK, Lee CG, Won JH. The socioeconomic impact of terminal cancer on patients' families and its associated factors. J Korean Acad Fam Med. 2005. 26:31–39.
5. Kwon YC, Shin DW, Lee JH, Heo DS, Hon YS, Kim S-Y, Yun YH. Impact of perception of socioeconomic burden on advocacy for patient autonomy in end-of-life decision making: a study of societal attitudes. Palliative Medicine. 2009. 23:87–94.
Article
6. Yun YH, Kwak M, Park SM, Kim S, Choi JS, Lim HY, Lee CG, Choi YS, Hong YS, Kim SY, Heo DS. Chemotherapy use and associated factors among cancer patients near the end of life. Oncology. 2007. 72:164–171.
Article
7. Yun YH, Lee CG, Kim SY, Lee SW, Heo DS, Kim JS, Lee KS, Hong YS, Lee JS, You CH. The attitudes of cancer patients and their families toward the disclosure of terminal illness. J Clin Oncol. 2004. 22:307–314.
Article
8. Choi KS, You CH, Lee KH, Kim CY, Heo DS, Yun YH. Comparison of medical care cost between hospice care and conventional care in the last year of life. Korean J Health Policy Adm. 2005. 15:1–15.
Article
9. Yun YH, Kim SH, Lee KM, Park SM, Lee CG, Choi YS, Lee WS, Kim SY, Heo DS. Patient-reported assessment of quality care at end of life: development and validation of Quality Care Questionnaire-End of Life (QCQ-EOL). Eur J Cancer. 2006. 42:2310–2317.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKMA
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr