Korean J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg.  2014 Feb;18(1):14-20. 10.14701/kjhbps.2014.18.1.14.

Impact of critical pathway implementation on hospital stay and costs in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy

• Kim HE
• Kim YH
• Song KB
• Chung YS
• Hwang S
• Lee YJ
• Park KM
• Kim SC

• KMID: 1890075
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.14701/kjhbps.2014.18.1.14

Abstract

BACKGROUNDS/AIMS
Recent studies have shown that pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) can be performed quite safely. Critical pathway (CP) has been one of the key tools used to achieve excellent outcomes in high-quality, high-volume centers. This study was designed to evaluate the impact of CP implementation for PD patients.
METHODS
The important components of CP for PD patients include the early start of an oral diet and removal of the abdomen drain following follow-up computed tomography, with the intention of shortening the postoperative hospital stay. The study group (CP group) comprised of 88 patients who underwent pylorus-preserving or classical PD from January 2009 to December 2010. The control group (pre-CP group) was 185 patients who underwent PD between January 2005 and December 2008.
RESULTS
The two groups did not show significant differences in demographic profiles and the primary diagnosis. The incidences of overall postoperative complications such as delayed gastric emptying, fistula, and hemorrhage were similar or decreased in the CP group (54% vs. 40.9%). The incidence of clinically significant complications also showed a similar rate (5.4% vs. 4.5%) between the two groups. The nutritional status at discharge and re-admission rates were not different. The CP group showed a significantly shorter postoperative hospital stay (20.2+/-9.2 days vs. 14.9+/-5.1 days, p<0.001) and the total medical costs were also significantly reduced, by 15% (p<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
The results of this study indicated that the implementation of CP for PD patients can decrease the length of hospital stay and reduce medial costs, with maintenance or improvement of patient outcomes. Further investigation is necessary to validate the actual impact of CP for PD through multi-center high-volume studies.

Keyword

Critical pathway; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Hospital stay; Complication; Medical cost

MeSH Terms

Abdomen
Critical Pathways*
Diagnosis
Diet
Fistula
Follow-Up Studies
Gastric Emptying
Hemorrhage
Humans
Incidence
Intention
Length of Stay*
Nutritional Status
Pancreaticoduodenectomy*
Postoperative Complications

Reference

1. Büchler MW, Wagner M, Schmied BM, et al. Changes in morbidity after pancreatic resection: toward the end of completion pancreatectomy. Arch Surg. 2003; 138:1310–1314. PMID: 14662530.

2. Trede M, Schwall G, Saeger HD. Survival after pancreatoduodenectomy. 118 consecutive resections without an operative mortality. Ann Surg. 1990; 211:447–458. PMID: 2322039.

3. Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Sohn TA, et al. Six hundred fifty consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies in the 1990s: pathology, complications, and outcomes. Ann Surg. 1997; 226:248–257. PMID: 9339931.

4. Bassi C, Falconi M, Salvia R, et al. Management of complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy in a high volume centre: results on 150 consecutive patients. Dig Surg. 2001; 18:453–457. PMID: 11799295.

5. Gouma DJ, van Geenen RC, van Gulik TM, et al. Rates of complications and death after pancreaticoduodenectomy: risk factors and the impact of hospital volume. Ann Surg. 2000; 232:786–795. PMID: 11088073.

6. Richter A, Niedergethmann M, Sturm JW, et al. Long-term results of partial pancreaticoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head: 25-year experience. World J Surg. 2003; 27:324–329. PMID: 12607060.

7. Birkmeyer JD, Finlayson SR, Tosteson AN, et al. Effect of hospital volume on in-hospital mortality with pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surgery. 1999; 125:250–256. PMID: 10076608.

8. Campbell H, Hotchkiss R, Bradshaw N, et al. Integrated care pathways. BMJ. 1998; 316:133–137. PMID: 9462322.

9. Porter GA, Pisters PW, Mansyur C, et al. Cost and utilization impact of a clinical pathway for patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2000; 7:484–489. PMID: 10947015.

10. Pitt HA, Murray KP, Bowman HM, et al. Clinical pathway implementation improves outcomes for complex biliary surgery. Surgery. 1999; 126:751–756. PMID: 10520925.

11. Stephen AE, Berger DL. Shortened length of stay and hospital cost reduction with implementation of an accelerated clinical care pathway after elective colon resection. Surgery. 2003; 133:277–282. PMID: 12660639.

12. Cerfolio RJ, Bryant AS, Bass CS, et al. Fast tracking after Ivor Lewis esophagogastrectomy. Chest. 2004; 126:1187–1194. PMID: 15486381.

13. Kennedy EP, Rosato EL, Sauter PK, et al. Initiation of a critical pathway for pancreaticoduodenectomy at an academic institution--the first step in multidisciplinary team building. J Am Coll Surg. 2007; 204:917–923. PMID: 17481510.

14. Kennedy EP, Grenda TR, Sauter PK, et al. Implementation of a critical pathway for distal pancreatectomy at an academic institution. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009; 13:938–944. PMID: 19190968.

15. Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C, et al. Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery. 2007; 142:761–768. PMID: 17981197.

16. Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C, et al. Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery. 2007; 142:20–25. PMID: 17629996.

17. Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, et al. International study group on pancreatic fistula definition. postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery. 2005; 138:8–13. PMID: 16003309.

18. Guigoz Y, Vellas B, Garry PJ. Mini nutritional assessment: a practical assessment tool for grading the nutritional state of elderly patients. Nutrition in the elderly 1997. 1997. p. 15–60.

19. Guigoz Y. The mini nutritional assessment (MNA) review of the literature--what does it tell us? J Nutr Health Aging. 2006; 10:466–485. PMID: 17183419.

20. Vellas B, Guigoz Y, Garry PJ, et al. The mini nutritional assessment (MNA) and its use in grading the nutritional state of elderly patients. Nutrition. 1999; 15:116–122. PMID: 9990575.

21. McCarney R, Warner J, Iliffe S, et al. The hawthorne effect: a randomised, controlled trial. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007; 7:30. PMID: 17608932.